It’s all fun and games until your best friend fucks literally everyone up the asshole View quoted note →

The 16th of November may be considered as the Fourth of July in the economic life of the United States. Coming generations will commemorate it as marking the foundation of our financial emancipation. — Paul M. Warburg, architect of the Federal Reserve System, November 17, 1914 Under the operation of this law [Federal Reserve Act] such financial and commercial crises, or “panics,” as this country experienced in 1873, in 1893, and again in 1907, with their attendant misfortunes and prostrations, seem to be mathematically impossible. — John Skelton Williams, Comptroller of the Currency, December 7, 1914 I beg you all, walk out of here with me, never to come back. It’s the moral and ethical thing to do. Nothing good goes on in this place. Let’s lock the doors and leave the building to the spiders, moths, and four-legged rats. — Robert Wenzel, economist, in his concluding remarks while addressing members of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, April 25, 2012

Some people are just too fucking clever for their own good

Whatever. Multiple examples out there of BitKey saving people’s stack with non retarded UX and now heavily audited randomness generation that makes cold card look like a kindergarten project View quoted note →

Hey guise who is going to use their AI agent to find all the podcasts where a certain “crypto expert” acts as his own fluffer about his crypto skills and you know make a supercut??? Asking for a friend

Meanwhile in Deeznuts security lab: Bitkey vs Coldcard: Entropy Audit of mcu_rng.c Just finished auditing Bitkey's STM32U5 RNG driver after the Coldcard entropy disaster ($38M stolen, ~500 wallets swept in 25 min). The Coldcard bug in 2 sentences: A C macro #ifdef vs #if footgun caused the firmware to silently link against MicroPython's deterministic Yasmarang PRNG instead of the actual STM32 hardware RNG. Seeds were generated from device UID + timer state. Trivially brute-forceable. 5 years in production, nobody caught it. Bitkey's mcu_rng.c is structurally immune: • Single mcu_rng_get() implementation — reads RNG->DR directly from the hardware peripheral. No software PRNG exists anywhere in the codebase to accidentally link against. • NIST SP800-90B compliant configuration per ST application note AN-4230, with exact magic register values (CR=0x00F00D00, HTCR=0x0000A2B0, NSCR=0x00017CBB). • Runtime assertion verifies the control register is NISTC-compliant after write — catches bus errors, tamper, or glitches. • SECS status register checked on every read. On error: reconfigures, re-checks, ASSERTs (device halts via tamper). Fail-closed, not fail-open like Coldcard's exception handler. • DRBG layer reads 64 bytes from HW RNG (2× security strength to absorb bias), seeds NIST SP800-90A HMAC-DRBG, zeros the entropy buffer. • Seed generation path: crypto_random() → HMAC-DRBG → 32-byte seed → BIP-32 master key. Full pipeline traceable from register to private key. Minor notes (not vulnerabilities): • DRBG is seeded once at boot, never reseeded. Authors acknowledge this violates SP 800-90A but 2⁴⁸ calls is unreachable on a hardware wallet. Defensible. • No public reseed() API for user-supplied dice entropy at the DRBG layer. The lesson: Coldcard didn't fail because of weak cryptography. It failed because of a build-system linking bug that was invisible to code review. Bitkey's architecture has one entropy source, one path, and hardware-level assertions. The Coldcard attack is structurally impossible here. The best fix costs nothing: one build-time assertion that verifies which rng_get() symbol the linker actually resolved.

So maybe a unit test could have avoided this??? ‘Yes. And that's what makes this so frustrating — it wasn't a sophisticated exploit of some novel cryptographic weakness. It was a build configuration typo that silently broke security for 5 years, and it would have been caught by trivially simple tests. What would have caught it: 1. Entropy source smoke test: After device init, call the RNG twice, assert the outputs differ. Yasmarang seeded from (fixed_UID, tick) produces deterministic output on cold boot — two rapid calls would have returned identical bytes, failing immediately. 2. Symbol resolution check: Link libngu, then grep the final binary for rng_get and verify it resolves to the hardware-RNG object, not MicroPython's fallback. Coinkite's existing review verified the intended TRNG code was present in the firmware binary — but didn't verify which rng_get() the seed-generation path actually reached across submodules. A one-line linker-map assertion. 3. Reproducibility test: Generate a seed on a real device, then generate another seed after reboot. If they match (or collide more often than probability predicts), something is wrong. This is the absolute bare minimum — a five-minute test that any hardware wallet company should be running on every CI build. 4. Build-time assertion (the hotfix): Coinkite's actual fix was exactly this — exclude the fallback PRNG object and add a build-time symbol check that fails if the intended RNG symbol isn't the one that binds. They didn't even need new security infrastructure; they just needed to verify the linker did what they thought it did. Why it happened anyway: - The macro check (MICROPY_HW_ENABLE_RNG defined vs enabled) is the kind of C-preprocessor footgun that's easy to miss in code review - The fallback is a valid function that links successfully and returns bytes that look random — statistical tests pass, entropy looks fine to casual inspection - Reproducible build verification checked "is the code there?" but not "does the call graph reach it?" - No end-to-end integration test of "generate a seed on real hardware, verify it's not deterministic" Block's advisory explicitly names it: the existing review "confirmed that the intended TRNG implementation was present in the firmware binary, but did not verify which rng_get() implementation the wallet seed-generation path actually reached across the two submodules." The deeper lesson: Hardware wallet security depends on entropy being cryptographically strong at the exact moment a seed is generated. That's a runtime invariant, not a compile-time one. Unit tests and code reviews are necessary but not sufficient — you need hardware-in-the-loop tests that verify the entropy pipeline on real silicon, on every firmware release, ideally in CI. This wasn't a failure of cryptography. It was a failure of operational discipline around something that should be the highest-stakes part of a hardware wallet's firmware. A $38M lesson in why "it compiled and the code looks right" is not a security review.’

GM!

I used to work in privacy engineering. I once met the creator of PGP, Zimmerman… the only question he asked me about my project was “where does the entropy come from and how long after boot up is the RNG queried for randomness?” That is the majority of security. Entropy. A simple unit or integration test should have covered this issue.

Imagine getting hit by a bus and your family’s BTC is protected by only 40 bits of entropy and they have to move their BTC asap

COINKITE Blog

Coldcard Security Advisory

Funds from affected COLDCARD seeds are at risk if the seed lacks 50 independent, private dice rolls and the wallet lacks a strong, unique BIP-39 pa...

I’m pretty sure Coinkite is going out of business The lawsuits will be many and expensive

This poor entropy situation is the ultimate nightmare in cryptography. It’s literally Rule Number 1: use high randomization sources for entropy, like in the Linux kernel, etc, perhaps NOT EVEN shortly after boot up. I assume this python library has piss poor entropy and someone figured out how to generate your seed. I moved to multisig a long time ago and abandoned my MK3 and all Coinkite devices as they are too complex even for me to deal with. Imagine your heirs trying to figure out that fucking thing to extract your wealth after you get hit by a bus! View quoted note →

What Fucking Psyop Are You Retards Stuck Inside Of???

# Comprehensive Analysis Title: America Faces "Tank Bottom" on Oil and on Munitions, by Ron Unz - The Unz Review URL:

The Unz Review

America Faces

Collected: 2026-07-30 15:26:26 +0000 Analyzed: 2026-07-30 15:30:40 +0000 ## Overall takeaway Unz argues the Iran war has exposed a gap between U.S. rhetoric and real power: Iran’s retaliation, Hormuz pressure, and rapid missile depletion suggest America faces strategic and industrial limits, not easy victory. ## Conceptual model - Official success claims can hide material shortages and operational constraints. - A regional blockade can reveal whether naval power is truly decisive. - High-tech arsenals may be brittle if precision munitions are consumed faster than replenished. - War outcomes depend on industrial capacity, not just battlefield firepower. - Oil and military narratives may diverge from underlying physical realities. ## Next steps (optional) - Compare Unz’s claims with independent reporting on U.S. stockpiles and interception rates. - Track oil flows, shipping disruptions, and refinery margins for signs of a real supply squeeze. - Review how past air campaigns affected munitions inventories and escalation dynamics. ## Short summary Unz argues that the Iran war has exposed the limits of U.S. military power and the weakness of official triumphalist claims. He says Iran’s retaliation, pressure on the Strait of Hormuz, and the rapid drain on Tomahawk, Patriot, and other munitions reveal a strategic and industrial crisis for America. ## Comprehensive summary Ron Unz argues that the war against Iran has exposed the fragility of American power and the emptiness of official claims about military strength. He recounts the sequence of events since the surprise U.S.-Israeli attack: Iran survived the initial decapitation strike, responded with missiles and drones, and most importantly shut down the Strait of Hormuz, threatening a major share of world oil and LNG supplies. According to Unz, this immediately revealed that America’s expensive navy could not easily reopen the waterway and that a ground operation would be too costly and dangerous to attempt. He then describes how the war became a grinding air campaign that depleted U.S. stockpiles of advanced munitions far faster than expected. Citing reports from CSIS, the media, and military analysts such as John Mearsheimer and Daniel Davis, Unz says the United States has burned through a large fraction of its global inventories of Tomahawks, Patriot interceptors, and other precision weapons. He portrays Trump as alternating between bluster and retreat, first accepting an agreement with Iran under pressure from oil executives, then backing away under influence from hawks and the Israel lobby, and finally restarting the war despite having fewer weapons and weaker options than before. A major theme of the article is that oil markets are not reflecting reality. Unz repeats his earlier claim that the stable, low “paper” price of oil must be the result of manipulation, masking the much tighter physical market created by the blockade and the destruction of stockpiles. He warns that this illusion is likely temporary. With the Houthis cutting off Saudi rerouting routes, China resuming imports, and global reserves already low, he predicts an approaching “tank bottom” crisis in oil. The article ends with a broader conclusion: America may now be entering a period of strategic and industrial exhaustion. Unz sees the war as evidence that the U.S. has overextended itself militarily, economically, and politically, while Iran has shown surprising resilience and escalation dominance. In his view, Trump’s conduct reflects either delusion or catastrophic incompetence, and the result is a humiliating American retreat in the making, alongside the possibility of severe global shortages and a deeper crisis for the petrodollar system. ## Entities - keyword: u.s., munitions, iranian, missiles, military, trump, iran, american, attack, iranians - location: Jordan, Washington, Natanz, Persian Gulf, Yemen, Israel, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Kuwait, Iran - organization: Royal United Services Institute, Tomahawks, New York Times, The Telegraph, Trump Administration, Suez Canal, Marines, NASA, Senate, Times - person: Prof. Mearsheimer, Caine, Hegseth, Dan Caine, Sen, Video Link Furthermore, Natanz Strike, Philip Pilkington, Jon Ossoff, Benjamin Netanyahu ## Related content 1. Is America Winning or Losing the War with Iran?, by Ron Unz - The Unz Review Why: similarity 0.94 Summary: - • The document discusses America's evolving military strategies, particularly its approach to war with Iran, contrasting it with historical norms of warfare that adhered to international laws. - • The conflict with Iran escalated following supposed peace negotiations, during which the U.S. and Israel planned a surprise missile strike to eliminate Iranian leadership, effectively declaring war. - • The timing of the strike was strategically chosen to coincide with a high-level meeting of Iranian leaders, resulting in significant casualties among Iran’s military and political elite. - • Mainstream media portrayed the military actions as a success, while downplaying the illegal nature of using diplomatic negotiations as a ruse for an attack. - • Unz emphasizes the challenges of waging war against a country as large and populous as Iran, highlighting warnings from military experts about the potential for a protracted conflict. - • Political concerns arose from various political figures, including conservative media personalities, who criticized the war as contrary to American interests and public sentiment. - • Criticism also came from within Trump's support base, with figures like Tucker Carlson and Marjorie Taylor Greene expressing outrage over the war, contradicting the administration's previous "America First" stance. - • The document concludes with reflections on the broader implications of the war, suggesting a shift towards global lawlessness that could have dire consequences. URL:

The Unz Review

Is America Winning or Losing the War with Iran?

2. (1) Kagan Admits U.S. Defeat By Iran - Global GeoPolitics Why: similarity 0.94 Summary: Robert Kagan’s article in *The Atlantic* is presented here as an unexpected admission from one of the most influential hawks in Washington: the United States has suffered a strategic defeat by Iran that it cannot reverse. The document emphasizes Kagan’s long record of support for American interventionism, tying him to the architects of the Iraq War and the broader neoconservative project. Because of that history, his conclusion is framed as especially significant. According to the piece, the collapse of American power in this conflict is not just a tactical setback, but an unmistakable sign that the machinery of U.S. imperial dominance has broken down. The middle of the document argues that the military and intelligence realities leave Washington with no good options. Iran is said to have retained most of its missile forces, rebuilt key facilities, and demonstrated enough resilience to outlast an American blockade. At the same time, U.S. weapons stockpiles are described as depleted after only a few weeks of fighting, revealing serious limits in America’s ability to sustain a major war. The text portrays President Trump as facing a choice between declaring victory and retreating, or escalating into an even larger and politically unsellable ground war. In this account, Iran is not behaving like a defeated state but like a victor setting the terms of the regional order. The document then extends the consequences beyond Iran itself. It claims that Iranian control over the Strait of Hormuz has destroyed the American strategy of using energy security to pressure Asia and contain China. Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, and Taiwan are portrayed as seeing that the U.S. Navy cannot guarantee safe shipping through the world’s most important energy chokepoint. The same defeat is said to weaken U.S. support for Ukraine, alarm European allies, and expose the fragility of American weapons supply lines. Finally, the piece argues that China is watching all of this carefully and will conclude that U.S. military credibility in Asia has been gravely damaged. The overall tone is triumphalist from the perspective of Iran and sharply critical of American imperial overreach, presenting the war as a turning point that accelerates the decline of U.S. global power. URL:

Kagan Admits U.S. Defeat By Iran

The co-founder of the Project for the New American Century writes the Empire's Obituary - How the United States Lost a War it Started and Cannot Es...

3. MoA - Proliferation, Retaliation, And Other Consequences Of The War On Iran Why: similarity 0.93 Summary: • The U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities have undermined the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), as Iran was a compliant member with no nuclear weapons program, verified by IAEA inspections down to the milligram • Iran likely moved 400kg of 60% enriched uranium from Fordow before the U.S. strike and has undisclosed bunker facilities, making it probable Iran will leave the NPT and "go dark" on its nuclear program, becoming a latent nuclear weapon state • The attacks' true purpose is to provoke a violent Iranian response to justify all-out war aimed at regime change, referenced by Israel's operation name "Rising Lion" (showing the Shah's flag) and U.S. promotion of the Shah's son • Regime change in Iran is unlikely due to strong government legitimacy, societal support, and balanced military structure between regular forces and Revolutionary Guards • Iran will likely avoid direct U.S. confrontation but continue attritional warfare against Israel through daily drone/missile strikes to deplete air defenses, while potentially closing the Strait of Hormuz to energy shipments for countries supporting its enemies • Economic consequences include oil prices above $100/barrel triggering U.S. recession and Republican losses in midterm elections, making Trump a lame duck • The attacks violated the U.S. Constitution, UN Charter, and Geneva Convention protocols, signaling a complete breakdown of international law and a return to "might makes right" global disorder • This lawlessness abroad threatens domestic freedoms in Western countries as ruling classes abandon ethical and legal constraints URL:

Proliferation, Retaliation, And Other Consequences Of The War On Iran – Moon of Alabama

4. Timeline: U.S. Military Strikes Against Iran | TheBoard.world Why: similarity 0.92 Summary: - • The U.S. military has executed over 1,700 strikes against Iranian targets since February 28, 2026, marking a significant escalation in military operations. - • The campaign aims to degrade Iran’s military capabilities and deter further aggression, with some officials hinting at regime change as a possible objective. - • Over 50 advanced U.S. fighter jets were rapidly deployed to the region within the first 48 hours of the campaign. - • Initial reports indicate three U.S. service members have died and five have been seriously injured due to Iranian missile strikes. - • Historical precedents suggest intensive air campaigns can degrade military assets but may also spur nuclear proliferation among targeted and neighboring states. - • The operation began with a rapid strike count, exceeding 1,000 targets within the first 24 hours. - • Iranian forces retaliated with missile strikes on Al Udeid Air Base, underscoring the risks associated with such rapid military escalation. - • Concerns have arisen regarding the potential for Iran and its neighbors to accelerate nuclear weapons development as a means of deterrence. - • Predictions indicate Iran may announce resumed uranium enrichment by September 2026, and nearby countries may reevaluate their nuclear programs within a year. - • The operational tempo of U.S. and Israeli strikes is expected to maintain at least 100 strikes per week through June 2026 unless a ceasefire is achieved. URL:

The Board

Timeline: U.S. Military Strikes Against Iran

Breaking down the timeline of U.S. military strikes against Iran, confirmed facts, and the strategic implications of this escalation in the region.

5. The US War Machine Underwhelms – part 1, by Hua Bin - The Unz Review Why: similarity 0.92 Summary: 1. **Strategic Failure of the US Military**: The US has shifted its war goals from “regime change” in Iran to merely “keeping the Strait of Hormuz open,” which indicates a significant strategic defeat. The strait was previously open to all, highlighting the failure of the US military objectives. 2. **Cognitive Dissonance Among US Leadership**: The US ruling elite, including the Commander-in-Chief, promotes a narrative of unparalleled military success while battlefield realities tell a different story. This disconnect reveals a troubling level of denial regarding the war's actual outcomes. 3. **Civilian Casualties and Targeting Issues**: The US military operations have resulted in high civilian casualties, with significant strikes occurring in civilian areas, such as the tragic attack on a school that killed 175 individuals. This raises questions about the ethical implications and effectiveness of US military strategies. 4. **High-value Asset Losses**: The US has suffered significant losses of advanced military equipment—such as radar systems, fighter jets, and naval assets—due to Iranian counterattacks, which have utilized cheaper drones and missiles effectively against US technology. 5. **Underwhelming Military Performance**: Despite deploying its most advanced military assets and weaponry, the US has not achieved substantial degradation of Iranian military capabilities. Remarkably, Iran has maintained a resilient military posture and continues to conduct counterattacks, undermining the US narrative of military superiority. 6. **Misleading Claims by US Officials**: US military and political leaders have claimed that Iranian defenses were “obliterated,” yet evidence on the ground contradicts these assertions, showing continued effectiveness of Iranian missile and drone capabilities. 7. **Impact on US Military Doctrine**: The performance of the US military in this conflict highlights potential flaws in its operational doctrine. Observers note that lessons learned during this war could influence future conflicts, particularly regarding the over-reliance on high-tech solutions against less sophisticated foes. 8. **Concerns Regarding Future Conflicts**: The implications of the Iran conflict are being closely monitored by military analysts worldwide, especially in nations like China. The underperformance of the US military may embolden adversaries and reshape global military strategies. 9. **Call for Reevaluation of Military Strategy**: The stark contrast between the US military's advertised capabilities and its actual performance suggests a need for reevaluation of military strategy and investment in more effective, adaptable defense mechanisms. 10. **Broader Implications for US Foreign Policy**: This underwhelming military engagement may have long-term consequences for US foreign policy, weakening its credibility and deterrence posture on the global stage, while potentially inviting increased aggression from rivals. These insights collectively reflect a critical assessment of the US military's capabilities and operational strategies, suggesting a need for significant reform and adaptation in light of recent failures. URL:

The Unz Review

The US War Machine Underwhelms – part 1

6. US Military Forced To Let Some Iranian Projectiles Through Its Defenses: NBC | ZeroHedge Why: similarity 0.92 Summary: The article reports growing concern that U.S. forces in the Middle East are increasingly vulnerable to Iranian missile and drone attacks because American air defenses are being stretched thin. Citing NBC News, it says U.S. military commanders are now being forced to ration interceptor missiles, especially Patriots, due to declining stockpiles after sustained combat operations. This comes amid heightened criticism from some lawmakers, who argue that U.S. troops have become exposed and that the situation has grown especially dangerous following the deaths of four American service members earlier this month. The central claim is that commanders are not intercepting every incoming projectile. Instead, they are allegedly choosing which Iranian missiles and explosive drones to engage, and allowing some to pass through if they appear unlikely to hit U.S. personnel, critical facilities, or allied targets. According to the report, this approach has been in place since the early days of the war. The article portrays this as a striking and troubling admission, suggesting that American bases and host countries may be far less protected than previously assumed. At the same time, the piece notes that the strategy has led to some Iranian projectiles striking U.S. bases anyway, particularly when those bases are abandoned or when the attacks cause only limited damage. Officials reportedly said there have been cases where missiles and drones were allowed to hit installations as long as no Americans were present. The article presents this as a notable departure from previous practice, when threats to bases were typically intercepted. The story also emphasizes the strain on U.S. missile defenses across the region. It cites a CSIS assessment saying the Pentagon used nearly 50% of its Patriot missiles, more than half of its THAAD systems, and over 45% of its Precision Strike Missiles during the early phase of the Iran air and missile campaign. With air defenses working at high tempo for months, the article argues that the recent resurgence of attacks has renewed pressure on U.S. and regional security. Overall, the piece frames the situation as evidence that American forces are facing an increasingly difficult and dangerous air war, with limited interceptors forcing commanders to make hard choices about what to defend and what to let through. URL: https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/us-military-intentionally-letting-some-iranian-projectiles-through-its-defenses#google_vignette 7. U.S. Ramps Up Surveillance Amid Fears Of Iran-Backed Sleeper Cells  | ZeroHedge Why: similarity 0.92 Summary: • President Trump announced a potential U.S. strike on Iranian nuclear targets could occur within two weeks, with increased military activity across USNORTHCOM, USEUCOM, and USCENTCOM theaters suggesting pre-strike staging • U.S. intelligence and law enforcement have intensified surveillance of Iran-backed sleeper cells, particularly Hezbollah-linked operatives and IRGC proxy networks, amid concerns they could conduct retaliatory attacks if the U.S. strikes Iran • FBI Director Kash Patel has increased monitoring efforts of domestic sleeper cells since Israel's Operation Rising Lion offensive began, according to U.S. officials • The threat from Iranian operatives has been a concern since the U.S. assassination of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani in January 2020 • Federal prosecutors recently charged an IRGC operative and two U.S.-based individuals with plotting to surveil and assassinate critics of the Iranian regime, including an alleged plot against Trump • Former CIA officer Sarah Adams claims Al-Qaeda has trained and deployed over 1,000 fighters within U.S. borders for a homeland attack, comparing the number to the 1,400 involved in the Hamas attack • The document emphasizes that open southern borders during the Biden-Harris administration have increased uncertainty about the number of IRGC or Hezbollah-linked operatives inside the U.S. • Officials warn these terror networks could target high-visibility or soft targets in retaliation for any U.S. military action against Iran URL:

ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

8. Trump’s War with Iran Is Even More of a Disaster than People Realize | Mises Institute Why: similarity 0.92 Summary: - • The recent U.S. and Israeli attacks on Iran resulted in significant military action, targeting Iranian leaders and prompting retaliatory strikes from Iran, including missile attacks on Israel and U.S. bases in the Gulf. - • President Trump's stated goal was to liberate the Iranian people from their regime, but there was no organized opposition to support a regime change. - • The operation appears focused on regime collapse rather than genuine change, aimed at maintaining Israeli dominance in the region rather than alleviating Iranian suffering. - • The U.S. and Israel's priority is to eliminate Iran's ballistic missile capabilities, but they risk depleting their own missile defense systems quickly, leading to vulnerabilities. - • The air campaign's costs are substantial, and there are concerns about economic impacts, such as threats to oil infrastructure and maritime safety in the Strait of Hormuz. - • Domestic violence risks may increase in the U.S. due to anger among the Shia Muslim population following the deaths of Iranian leaders. - • The U.S. may not be able to simply withdraw after destabilizing Iran, potentially leading to another prolonged military engagement. - • The underlying issue is the unsustainable financial state of the U.S., with a $40 trillion debt and an inflation crisis exacerbated by excessive government spending. - • The U.S. has become a militarized empire, using military interventions to maintain power, which detracts from essential domestic institutions and resources. - • Historical patterns show that empires decline due to overextension and costly wars, a fate that may await the U.S. if it continues its imperial pursuits. - • Trump's campaign was based on recognizing the need for change, yet the Iranian operation represents a commitment to the unsustainable imperial trajectory that is driving URL: https://mises.org/mises-wire/trumps-war-iran-even-more-disaster-people-realize? ## Pointed questions for discussion - What evidence would most convincingly show whether U.S. military power is being overstated or merely constrained temporarily? - How should analysts weigh battlefield symbolism against industrial capacity when judging war outcomes? - If stockpiles are truly strained, what does that imply for U.S. strategy in other theaters? ## Sentiment Score: -0.76 ## Provider OpenRouter / ~openai/gpt-mini-latest

You win some you lose some View quoted note →

A masterclass in retarded groveling. Epic. View quoted note →

601 dollars Venmo’d out gets you into hot water but literally dropping thousands of tons of highly explosive munitions on women and children is the apex of morality Fuck Washington DC in the ass with a chainsaw Thank you for your attention to this matter View quoted note →

LOL So those evil Chinese can make literally every other thing for us to buy - but not robots View quoted note →

These fucking retards will do anything that is not effective or pragmatic to push the narrative. The real solution is abolishing public schools View quoted note →

The Department of War is this largest communist organization outside of China View quoted note →