This is more of an admission of total bankruptcy than anything else
# Comprehensive Analysis
Title: Gabbard Says Trump Has Ended America's Era Of 'Regime Change' | ZeroHedge
URL:
Gabbard Says Trump Has Ended America's Era Of 'Regime Change' | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
Collected: 2025-11-02 03:35:57 +0000
Analyzed: 2025-11-02 22:56:53 +0000
## Overall takeaway
Tulsi Gabbard emphasizes a shift in U.S. foreign policy from military interventions to economic cooperation under Trump.
## Conceptual model
- End of regime change policies under Trump.
- Focus on economic cooperation over military interventions.
- Critique of past foreign policy's effectiveness.
- Importance of respecting national traditions.
- Shift towards regional stability and partnerships.
## Next steps (optional)
- Explore implications of this policy shift on global relations.
- Analyze potential challenges in implementing economic cooperation.
- Discuss the impact on U.S. military presence abroad.
## Short summary
Tulsi Gabbard, the U.S. national intelligence director, stated that the era of U.S. 'regime change' under President Trump has ended, emphasizing a shift towards economic cooperation instead of military interventions. She criticized past foreign policy strategies, underscoring the importance of respecting national traditions and regional commerce.
## Comprehensive summary
- • Tulsi Gabbard, the U.S. national intelligence director, declared that the era of U.S. “regime change or nation building” has ended under President Trump, labeling previous strategies as ineffective and wasteful.
- • Gabbard criticized the long-standing foreign policy approach, stating it led to a cycle of conflict that resulted in significant financial costs and loss of life, creating more enemies than allies.
- • Echoing Trump’s earlier statements, Gabbard emphasized that efforts to impose American governance abroad have failed, with Trump citing the negative outcomes of U.S. interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq.
- • Trump highlighted the importance of respecting national traditions and focusing on regional commerce, contrasting successful Gulf state developments with U.S. military interventions.
- • Gabbard’s remarks indicate a shift in U.S. foreign policy towards economic cooperation and selective military action, moving away from previous administrations' interventionist strategies.
- • Former Ambassador James Jeffrey noted that Trump’s Middle East policy prioritizes regional stability and partnerships while rejecting American interference in foreign affairs.
- • Gabbard mentioned the fragile cease-fire in Gaza and ongoing concerns about Iran's nuclear activities, acknowledging the challenges ahead while affirming the president's commitment to this new approach.
## Entities
- keyword: regional, u.s., nation, national, trump, gabbard, regime, policy, building, said
- location: Saudi Arabia, Washington, Iran, Afghanistan, Bahrain, Gaza, Hawaii, America, U.S., Iraq
- organization: Associated Press, Abraham Accords of Trump, White House, Hamas, The Epoch Times, National Intelligence, International Atomic Energy Agency, U.S. Army National Guard, Hoover Institution
- person: Gabbard, Trump, Tom Ozimek, James Jeffrey, Tulsi Gabbard, Travis Gillmore, Jeffrey, Donald Trump
## Related content
1. Dances With Bears » IN ROPE-A-DOPE WARFIGHTING STRATEGY, NOTHING QUITE SUCCEEDS LIKE FAILURE
Why: similarity 0.92
Summary: • The document uses Muhammad Ali's rope-a-dope boxing strategy as a metaphor for Iran's military strategy against US attacks, where appearing to absorb punishment sets up a counterattack
• US officials claim a successful 25-minute bombing raid on Iran's nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan using 125+ aircraft, submarines, and precision weapons, with General Caine asserting "complete destruction" achieved through tactical surprise
• Iran reportedly received advance notice limiting targets to three sites, with no Iranian defensive response during the attack; Trump and VP Vance contradict each other on whether Iranian leadership was targeted
• Iran's IRGC criticizes Russia and China for insufficient support, warning of relationship reviews while posting an image of Putin and Xi together
• Former Russian President Medvedev suggests Iran's nuclear infrastructure remains intact and implies Russian support for Iran's nuclear weapons program, mocking Trump's claimed success
• Independent intelligence assessment indicates Iran retains 80-90% enriched uranium, has weapons casing ready, conducted cold tests with North Korea, and moved enriched material before the attack
• Trump's approval ratings show improvement since April, with foreign policy disapproval worse than overall ratings, suggesting the Iran attack serves domestic political purposes
• No significant internal dissent exists within Trump administration after purges; DNI Tulsi Gabbard supports the Iran war stance despite Trump's public criticism
• Putin acknowledges "special sensitivity" regarding Israel-Iran issues, citing Russia's two million Russian-speaking citizens in Israel while maintaining commitments to Iran
URL:
Dances With Bears
IN ROPE-A-DOPE WARFIGHTING STRATEGY, NOTHING QUITE SUCCEEDS LIKE FAILURE
By John Helmer, Moscow @bears_with
When Muhammad Ali famously demonstrated the rope-a-dope strategy in the Zaire title bout again
2. (3) Trump vs. the swamp: the first 126 days
Why: similarity 0.92
Summary: • Trump has been president for 126 days with mixed results; supporters may be judging him too harshly, similar to frustrated sports fans who think they could do better from the sidelines
• The presidency isn't all-powerful; Col. Douglas Macgregor's experience reveals how Trump's first-term attempts to withdraw from Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq, and Europe were blocked by disloyal staff, Senate committees, allies, and military-industrial complex interests
• Trump wanted to sign an executive order for Afghanistan withdrawal but was talked out of it by McConnell and others citing concerns about allies; he ultimately "buckled" and kept troops there to maintain contractor money flow
• The swamp's powerful interest groups continue to impede Trump's agenda, with some literally wanting him dead, forcing his administration to tread cautiously and appearing chaotic on issues like Russia/Ukraine, Israel, and Iran
• Despite challenges, Trump has achieved significant positive changes: withdrawing from Paris climate accords and WHO, defunding USAid, reestablishing Russia relations, renewing Ukraine-Russia peace talks, brokering India-Pakistan ceasefire, announcing China trade agreement, reducing prescription drug prices by 80%, securing Hamas hostage release, reducing illegal immigration, and providing veteran housing
• These changes mark a radical departure from decades of Clinton-Obama-Biden policies that created unsustainable crises and war risks
• The alternative was Kamala Harris, who promised government crackdowns on free speech and social media censorship, with Biden-Harris administration working with British government to implement UK-style censorship operations in America
URL:
Trump vs. the swamp: the first 126 days
It's a mixed bag, it includes some very encouraging developments
3. Getting Out Of Forever Wars | ZeroHedge
Why: similarity 0.91
Summary: • The U.S. has spent $8 trillion on post-9/11 "forever wars" with devastating human costs: 7,000 service members killed, 55,000 injured, 940,000 total deaths from violence, and 28,000 veteran suicides—four times combat losses
• Public sentiment has shifted against military overreach, with 54% of Americans favoring reduced overseas commitments and 83% prioritizing domestic needs over foreign interventions
• The U.S. maintains 750 military facilities across 80 countries at $80 billion annually, yet terrorism risk remains minimal (1 in 150 million chance of death) while overseas operations have destabilized regions rather than securing them
• A pragmatic strategy involves cutting outdated bases by 25% to save $15 billion annually while maintaining strategic positions in Japan and Germany to deter Russia and China
• Resources should shift to homeland defense priorities: missile defense systems (currently only 3.5% of defense budget), border security (3 million encounters in FY2024), and addressing the $130 billion immigration crisis
• NATO allies must increase defense spending to meet 2% GDP targets, as the U.S. spent twice their combined total from 2014-2022, creating unsustainable burden-sharing inequities
• Soft power through diplomacy and economic leverage offers cost-effective alternatives to military force, though multilateral trade agreements have created persistent deficits requiring bilateral renegotiation
• Economic security underpins national power, with the U.S. economy representing 25% of global wealth and achieving energy independence
URL:
Getting Out Of Forever Wars | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
4. 'We Are Done With This Sh*t': Hegseth, Trump Blast Wokeness In Military Before Unimpressed Generals | ZeroHedge
Why: similarity 0.91
Summary: - • Pete Hegseth addressed around 800 military leaders at Quantico, emphasizing a return to a warrior ethos and military discipline amid ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza.
- • He criticized the Biden administration's "woke culture" in the military, vowing to eliminate identity politics, climate change priorities, and gender issues.
- • Hegseth pledged a focus on war fighting and vowed to end nation-building efforts, echoing sentiments of military veterans against previous conflicts.
- • Trump supported Hegseth's views, discussing plans to increase military size and emphasizing merit-based personnel decisions.
- • He proposed using dangerous cities for military training, which may not sit well with enlisted ranks.
- • Trump made controversial remarks about handling demonstr
URL:
'We Are Done With This Sh*t': Hegseth, Trump Blast Wokeness In Military Before Unimpressed Generals | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
5. (3) The End of American Wars Abroad—and the New Battle at Home
Why: similarity 0.91
Summary: • **The era of large-scale U.S. military campaigns abroad has ended** due to hypersonic missiles, logistical challenges, and new warfare technologies that make traditional deployments obsolete
• **Seven key factors drive this shift:** hypersonic missiles enabling precision strikes from vast distances; overwhelming logistical burdens of overseas deployments; remote warfare capabilities through drones and AI; cyber warfare supremacy; prohibitive economic and political costs; public exhaustion from endless wars; and elite special operations replacing large invasions
• **Modern warfare now relies on precision strikes, cyber operations, and covert missions** rather than massive ground invasions, fundamentally altering U.S. military strategy
• **The "forever war" profiteers—defense contractors, politicians, and media outlets**—face declining revenues as foreign conflicts end, threatening their established power structures
• **These groups are redirecting their efforts inward**, targeting the United States and United Kingdom to maintain profits and influence through domestic instability
• **Their strategy involves funding extremist groups**, spreading misinformation, undermining institutions, and exploiting divisive issues like race, religion, and immigration to create internal conflict
• **The consequences include potential economic collapse** as instability drives away investment, destroys jobs and savings, and causes capital flight to safer overseas jurisdictions
• **This shift represents a new battlefield** where the same forces that profited from foreign wars now threaten national stability from within to preserve their wealth and power
URL:
The End of American Wars Abroad—and the New Battle at Home
The era of the United States launching massive military campaigns across the globe has drawn to a close.
6. (3) The End of American Wars Abroad—and the New Battle at Home
Why: similarity 0.91
Summary: • The era of massive U.S. military campaigns abroad has ended due to hypersonic missiles, logistical challenges, and new precision warfare technologies that achieve objectives without ground invasions
• Seven factors make large-scale foreign wars obsolete: hypersonic missiles (unstoppable Mach 5+ weapons), overwhelming logistical burdens, remote warfare capabilities (drones/AI), cyber warfare potential, high economic/political costs, public exhaustion from endless wars, and elite special forces conducting targeted missions
• Modern warfare now relies on precision strikes, cyber operations, and covert missions rather than traditional army deployments, though these cannot win sustained conflicts against major powers
• The U.S. faces technological competition as foreign powers rapidly advance their cyber and defensive capabilities while America struggles with declining domestic engineering talent
• Defense contractors, politicians, and media outlets that profited from "forever wars" are redirecting efforts inward to maintain revenue streams through domestic division
• These "Praetorians, Mob States and Devil's Legions" employ tactics including: funding extremist groups, spreading misinformation, undermining institutional credibility, and exploiting divisive social issues
• The strategy aims to create perpetual domestic crisis to justify defense budgets, surveillance programs, and authoritarian policies under the guise of "restoring order"
• Stakes include potential economic collapse from market instability, capital flight overseas, and the transformation of America into an internally divided battleground
URL:
The End of American Wars Abroad—and the New Battle at Home
The era of the United States launching massive military campaigns across the globe has drawn to a close.
7. Profiling Palantir, by Janko Vukic - The Unz Review
Why: similarity 0.91
Summary: • Palantir Technologies, named after Tolkien's "seeing-stones," is a $200 billion surveillance company founded in 2003 by Peter Thiel and Alex Karp, criticized as "the most evil company on the planet"
• CEO Alex Karp is described as a strident Zionist and self-proclaimed socialist who cites Israel, the Frankfurt School, and his Jewish heritage as foundational to his worldview
• The company specializes in AI and big data analytics through four main platforms: Gotham (military/intelligence), Foundry (corporate clients), Apollo, and AIP
• Palantir has extensive government contracts including with the CIA, US military, Department of Defense, and dozens of police departments, as well as corporate clients like JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, and Big Pharma companies
• Karp openly supports using AI and military technology to defend Israel and Ukraine, holding Palantir's first 2025 board meeting in Tel Aviv and forming a strategic partnership with Israel's Ministry of Defense
• During a CNBC interview, Karp expressed his desire to use military drones against political enemies and "enemies of Jewry," equating support for Israel with supporting "the West"
• The company was integral to COVID-19 vaccine allocation under Operation Warp Speed during Trump's administration
• Despite Karp's criticism of Trump and support for Democrats, Palantir maintains strong ties to both parties, with VP JD Vance being close to both Thiel and Karp
• The author views Palantir as an existential threat to personal
URL:
The Unz Review
Profiling Palantir
The tech firm beloved by the WEF and founded by Peter Thiel and Zionist zealot, Alex Karp — that is watching every last move you make.
## Pointed questions for discussion
- How might this shift in policy affect U.S. relationships with traditional allies?
- What are the potential risks of reducing military interventions?
- In what ways can economic cooperation be effectively implemented in conflict-prone regions?
## Sentiment
Score: 0.80
## Provider
OpenRouter / openai/gpt-4o-mini
Shared via
Memetic Research Laboratories LLC
Memetic Research Laboratories LLC - Privacy-focused technology for digital content management and decentralized communication
Analyzed: 2025-11-05 14:54:45 +0000
Overall takeaway:
Caitlin Johnstone critiques society's failure to hold Dick Cheney accountable for war crimes, reflecting on his legacy of militarism.
Short summary:
Caitlin Johnstone expresses strong disdain for Dick Cheney, accusing him of being a key architect of U.S. militarism and warmongering. The author reflects on society's failure to hold Cheney accountable for war crimes, suggesting he deserved a life of obscurity rather than recognition.
Comprehensive summary:
• The author expresses strong disdain for Dick Cheney, viewing him as a primary architect of U.S. militarism and warmongering in the 21st century.
• Condolences from prominent political figures, both Democrats and Republicans, highlight a troubling bipartisan legacy tied to war crimes and violence.
• Cheney's death is framed as a failure of society to hold accountable those responsible for immense human suffering, suggesting he should have faced severe consequences for his actions.
• In a more just society, Cheney would have lived a life of obscurity, punished for his role in the Iraq War and its aftermath.
• The author emphasizes that Cheney's harmful legacy continues, with new leaders adopting similar militaristic ideologies without fear of repercussions.
• The absence of Cheney is described as a relief, with the author finding a sense of peace in living in a world without him.
• While acknowledging that the empire's violent nature won't change, the author experiences a personal sense of liberation from Cheney's influence.
• The piece concludes on a note of personal reflection, encouraging readers to appreciate the current reality of a world without Cheney's presence.
Entities:
keyword: find, dick, comfort, cheney, something, life, society, sane, live, rest
location: US, The Hague, Washington, Iraq
person: Bill Clinton, Dick Cheney, Kamala Harris, Cheney, Richard Bruce Cheney, Joe Biden, Caitlin Johnstone, Nancy Pelosi
Conceptual model:
- Cheney as a symbol of U.S. militarism.
- Bipartisan complicity in war crimes.
- Society's failure to seek accountability.
- Legacy of militarism persists in new leaders.
- Personal liberation from Cheney's influence.
Suggested next steps:
- Reflect on the implications of Cheney's legacy.
- Discuss accountability for political leaders.
- Explore how militarism shapes current policies.
Related content:
• Grok thinks the probability of the many 911 anomalies being coincidence is 1 in 100 quintillion, by Hua Bin - The Unz Review — similarity 0.90
• Iran Fires Missiles On US Bases In Gulf, But Admits Advanced Notice Was Given | ZeroHedge — similarity 0.90
• Episode 308 - 9/11 Trillions: Follow The Money | The Corbett Report — similarity 0.89
• American Pravda: A Dozen Unknown Books and the World War II History They Reveal, by Ron Unz - The Unz Review — similarity 0.89
• The "Monkey Wrench" Sabotage Of America Begs For An Authoritarian Response - Alt-Market.us — similarity 0.89
• MoA - In Saudi Arabia Trump Rejects Interventionism, Regime-Change Schemes — similarity 0.89
Use this context to answer follow-up questions. Ask for clarifications if needed.
**You** (09:55):
How closely related is the rise of Fiat money and a credit banking system responsible for someone like Dick Cheney to start war in the Middle East and cause chaos worldwide?
**AI Assistant** (09:55):
The rise of fiat money and a credit banking system is intricately linked to the broader landscape of U.S. foreign policy, including the militarism associated with figures like Dick Cheney. While it may not be a direct cause-and-effect relationship, several connections can be drawn:
1. **Economic Motivations for War**: Fiat money allows governments to print currency, which can lead to increased spending, including military expenditures. This financial capability can embolden leaders to engage in military interventions, as evidenced by U.S. actions in the Middle East. Cheney, as the architect of the Iraq War, operated within a context where financial resources were relatively abundant, allowing for extensive military engagement.
2. **Global Dominance and Oil**: The U.S. dollar's status as the world's reserve currency, supported by its fiat nature and the global banking system, ties directly to the country's military and geopolitical interests in oil-rich regions like the Middle East. Control over oil resources has historically been a key motivator for conflicts, and Cheney's policies often aligned with defending these economic interests.
3. **Debt and Militarization**: The credit banking system contributes to a culture of debt, which can finance military operations without immediate public resistance. This system allows for spending on defense to occur without the constraints of immediate taxation, potentially leading to more aggressive foreign policies as financial liabilities can be postponed.
4. **Political and Corporate Interests**: The intertwining of finance, politics, and military-industrial interests further complicates the relationship. Cheney, who worked for Halliburton, a major defense contractor, illustrates this overlap. The availability of fiat currency and credit can facilitate lucrative contracts for military operations, incentivizing war efforts that benefit corporations and political careers.
5. **Historical Context**: The post-1971 transition to a fiat currency system (abandoning the gold standard) enabled a shift in economic power dynamics, with increased government spending possibilities. This change coincided with more interventionist U.S. foreign policies, including those during Cheney's tenure.
Overall, while fiat money and credit banking systems are not solely responsible for wars in the Middle East, they provide a financial framework that enables and potentially encourages militaristic policies and actions by leaders like Dick Cheney.
Shared via 
Never Go Full Retard
Shared via 
Mama Mia #eth #retardation
Shared via 
Shared via 
Zerohedge comments are on point vis a vis Dick Fucking Cheney death
Shared via 
Shared via