deeznuts 's avatar
deeznuts
deeznuts@crypto.im
npub13tku...llwf
Enthusiasm enthusiast. “No Amount Of Violence Will Solve A Math Problem” Excel at research, analysis and meme-lording: https://memeticresearch.group/?page=contex.st
deeznuts 's avatar
deeznuts 4 months ago
Take Your Corn Off The Exchange!
deeznuts 's avatar
deeznuts 4 months ago
I like to call a retard a retard, but, am trying to use sound arguments to illustrate said retardation instead of using Ad Homintard non arguments. I’m trying, really. Thank you for your kind attention to this matter
deeznuts 's avatar
deeznuts 4 months ago
So who is fighting who and for what? # Comprehensive Analysis Title: Three-Dimensional Geopolitical Chess | ZeroHedge URL:
Three-Dimensional Geopolitical Chess | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
 Collected: 2025-10-06 03:02:49 +0000 Analyzed: 2025-10-06 14:40:00 +0000 ## Overall takeaway The Ukraine conflict reveals a complex geopolitical struggle, with Western strategies potentially undermining European autonomy and stability. ## Conceptual model - Conflict framed as Democracy vs. Autocracy is overly simplistic. - Western strategies may aim for regime change in Russia. - Europe risks becoming a vassal state through energy and military dependency. - Realist perspectives highlight NATO's expansion as a key tension point. - Long-term consequences of the conflict could reshape European security dynamics. ## Next steps (optional) - Explore alternative narratives around the Ukraine conflict. - Analyze the implications of European military strategies on regional stability. - Investigate the impact of energy policies on European autonomy. ## Short summary The article analyzes the complexities of the Ukraine conflict, suggesting the West is focused on destabilizing Russia while diminishing Europe’s autonomy. It further discusses the long-term consequences of Western military and economic strategies on the geopolitical landscape. ## Comprehensive summary - **Conflict Framing**: The Ukraine conflict began as a narrative of Democracy vs. Autocracy, yet this framing has diminished over time, revealing a more complex geopolitical landscape. - **Democracy's Decline**: Liberal democracy, heavily promoted in Europe, has shown significant decline, with real political dissent often appearing in countries considered authoritarian. - **Real Political Dynamics**: Realist interpretations of international relations, particularly John Mearsheimer’s views, highlight the tension between NATO's expansion and Russia's security concerns. - **Western Agenda**: The West's agenda appears to be focused on destabilizing Russia rather than merely containing it, aiming for regime change and potentially fragmenting the country. - **Impact on Europe**: The plan may involve reducing Europe to a vassal state, primarily through three strategies: - **Energy Dependency**: European elites have rejected affordable Russian oil, opting for costlier alternatives, leading to economic hardship while maintaining a façade of moral superiority. - **Weapon Depletion**: European armaments are being depleted in Ukraine, with the hope of maintaining U.S. support, despite the lack of clear evidence that Russia poses a direct threat to Europe. - **Perpetuating Conflict**: European leaders maintain the war's continuation, despite the possibility of dialogue with Russia, to entrap the U.S. in European affairs. - **Military Dynamics**: The Russian approach is characterized as a slow war of attrition, strategically avoiding direct confrontation to protect its forces while gradually advancing. - **U.S. Strategic Position**: The U.S. may emerge from this conflict with reduced involvement, shifting responsibility onto European nations, which are left to manage the aftermath of a hollowed-out Ukraine. ## Entities - keyword: ukraine, weapons, elites, european, russian, course, u.s., russia, nato, europe - location: Sweden, Russia, Ukrainian, Povrovsk, Ukraine, EU, Siversk, China, Hungary, United States - organization: European Parliament, United Nations, DJT, NATO - person: Orwell, Fredreich Merz, Simon Tisdall, King Charles III, Tony Blair, Kalla Kallas, Donald Trump, Anthony Blinken, Zelensky, Keith Kellogg ## Related content 1. Russia Is Not an Aggressor, and Ukraine Is Not a Victim | RealClearWire Why: similarity 0.94 Summary: • The Ukrainian military conflict began on February 24, 2022, but the author argues the seeds were planted 30 years earlier by Presidents Clinton and Bush through NATO's eastward expansion • Russian leaders (Gorbachev, Yeltsin, Putin) repeatedly warned they would not tolerate NATO expansion, particularly Ukraine joining and establishing military bases on Russia's border • The New York Times revealed in 2024 that the CIA operated 12 spy bases in Ukraine for a decade before the invasion, used to intercept Russian communications and launch attacks on Russian soil • American biological weapon facilities were also scattered across Ukraine, which Moscow perceived as a significant national security threat • The author compares this to Reagan's 1983 invasion of Grenada over Soviet concerns 1,500 miles away, arguing Putin's case was more compelling since Ukraine shares a border with Russia • Putin attempted to avoid conflict by sending NATO a draft treaty in autumn 2021 demanding no further NATO enlargement as a precondition for not invading Ukraine • NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg confirmed they refused to sign the treaty and did not pursue negotiations or explore alternatives to conflict • The author argues NATO needed to validate its existence after 30 years of failures and the Afghanistan withdrawal, requiring a credible enemy • Ukraine violated its 1997 neutrality treaty with Russia by announcing NATO membership intentions in 2004 • The author concludes that NATO, European states, and Ukraine all had interests in instigating invasion, while Russia was the sole party attempting to prevent conflict URL:
RealClearWire
Russia Is Not an Aggressor, and Ukraine Is Not a Victim
It is widely accepted that the Ukrainian crisis erupted into a military conflict on February 24, 2022, with the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Contra...
 2. Europe Goes Full Totalitarian And Puts The Entire Western World At Risk - Alt-Market.us Why: similarity 0.94 Summary: • Europe is implementing totalitarian measures including mass censorship, door-to-door enforcement against critics of immigration, and arrests for social media posts deemed "offensive" or "hate speech" • Conservative political movements face systematic suppression, with Romania blocking populist candidates from elections, and France/Germany attempting to ban right-leaning parties from participating in democratic processes • The UK leads in authoritarian crackdowns, arresting citizens for posting memes, flying national flags near migrants, and expressing opposition to mass immigration policies • European officials are escalating war rhetoric against Russia, threatening troop deployments to Ukraine and considering forced conscription of native populations while NATO increases border presence • Mass immigration from Islamic nations since 2014 serves as a deliberate strategy for cultural replacement, with 70% of global Muslims believing in eventual worldwide submission to Sharia Law • Third-world migrants function as government-backed enforcers to suppress native European dissent, following historical patterns of empires using foreign mercenaries against local populations • Predicted outcomes include forced military conscription, increased speech controls and arrests, implementation of CBDCs by end of 2025 for economic control, and inevitable Ukraine defeat despite Western intervention • The ultimate goal appears to be using WWIII as a catalyst for establishing a new world order through the deliberate destruction of Western civilization URL:
Alt-Market.us
Europe Goes Full Totalitarian And Puts The Entire Western World At Risk - Alt-Market.us
By Brandon Smith It’s happening again. Europe is once again going totalitarian and this time there’s a decidedly familiar communist...
 3. Did the Neocons Save the World from the Thucydides Trap?, by Ron Unz - The Unz Review Why: similarity 0.94 Summary: - • The concept of the "Thucydides Trap" suggests that rising powers often lead to conflict with established powers, drawing parallels from ancient Greek history. - • This idea gained prominence from Graham Allison's 2017 book "Destined for War," which highlights historical examples of such conflicts. - • In 12 out of 16 historical cases analyzed, a rising power confronted a dominant one, resulting in war, reinforcing fears of a potential conflict between the U.S. and China. - • Following the Cold War, the U.S. emerged as the sole superpower, but China's rapid economic and military growth poses a challenge to this status. - • Historical ties between nations do not preclude war; previous alliances, like that of Britain and Germany, did not prevent conflict due to underlying geopolitical tensions. - • The cultural and ideological differences between the U.S. and China, especially the latter's Communist governance, exacerbate the likelihood of conflict. - • Potential flashpoints, such as Taiwan and the South China Sea, could ignite military confrontations, similar to the alliances that led to World War I. - • Allison's analysis is supported by other scholars, including John Mearsheimer, who argues that great powers have historically acted to prevent rival hegemony through alliances and interventions. - • Mearsheimer's "offensive realism" suggests that established powers are inclined to block the rise of other potential hegemons to maintain global dominance. - • The potential for U.S.-China conflict remains a pressing concern, with historical patterns suggesting that military clashes may occur despite diplomatic intentions. URL:
The Unz Review
Did the Neocons Save the World from the Thucydides Trap?
 4. Europe To Spend $100BN It Doesn't Have, To Buy Weapons America Doesn't Have, To Arm Soldiers Ukraine Now Lacks | ZeroHedge Why: similarity 0.94 Summary: • Ukraine plans to purchase $100 billion in American weapons, financed by Europe, to secure US security guarantees amid ongoing conflict with Russia. • A proposed $50 billion deal aims to produce drones with Ukrainian companies, reflecting Ukraine's advancements in drone technology since the Russian invasion in 2022. • This strategy is perceived as an effort to ensure uninterrupted funding for Ukraine's war efforts while appeasing US political sentiments, particularly those of former President Trump. • Europe's insistence on maintaining pressure on Russia, including sanctions, aims to prevent any US deals that appear favorable to Moscow. • Geopolitical analyst Glenn Diesen critiques the situation, stating Europe is spending money it doesn't have to purchase arms from the US that are currently unavailable, to support a Ukrainian military that is lacking personnel. • The document suggests that prior to 2014, there was no significant threat to Ukraine, and Western actions to incorporate Ukraine into NATO have led to the current conflict. • The narrative framing Russia as a revanchist power has dominated discourse, stifling alternative viewpoints and labeling dissent as disinformation. • With the US distancing itself from the conflict, Europe’s response appears to be doubling down on military involvement, risking further destruction in Ukraine and potential global instability. • The overarching question remains whether the West can recognize its losses in this proxy war and pivot towards a peaceful resolution that prioritizes rebuilding Ukraine and regional security. • The presence of multiple European leaders complicates negotiations, potentially undermining cohesive strategy and response to the ongoing geopolitical crisis. URL:
Europe To Spend $100BN It Doesn't Have, To Buy Weapons America Doesn't Have, To Arm Soldiers Ukraine Now Lacks | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
 5. Assessing the Russian and Chinese Economies Geostrategically - American Affairs Journal Why: similarity 0.93 Summary: • The significance of assessing the Russian and Chinese economies has increased due to geopolitical tensions since the Ukraine war, necessitating a reevaluation of their global economic stature. • Initial comparisons of Russian GDP to smaller Western economies underestimated its importance, leading to a false sense of security regarding Western dominance. • The reliance on GDP as a primary economic indicator is flawed; it overlooks critical productive capacities and introduces vulnerabilities in the context of geopolitical competition. • Different methods of measuring economic size, such as exchange rates and purchasing power parity (PPP), yield significantly different assessments of the Russian and Chinese economies, with PPP showing them to be much stronger. • The productive sectors of economies should be emphasized, especially during wartime; Russia’s economic composition, with substantial industrial and agricultural sectors, positions it favorably compared to service-heavy Western economies. • Innovation, measured by patent filings, reveals that while China leads significantly, Russia ranks lower but still contributes to a considerable number of patents, indicating a competitive edge in certain technological areas. • Russia's role in global exports of critical products, including energy and agricultural commodities, highlights its economic power and strategic alliances, particularly with China, which could disrupt global markets if trade is interrupted. • A comprehensive understanding of economic power requires multiple indicators, particularly in today's geopolitically charged environment, shifting the narrative away from simplistic GDP comparisons. URL:
American Affairs Journal
Assessing the Russian and Chinese Economies Geostrategically - American Affairs Journal
Since the start of the war in Ukraine, the question of the size of the Russian and Chinese economies—relative to Western economies—has become h...
 6. More Ghastly Decisions by the Trump Administration?, by Philip Giraldi - The Unz Review Why: similarity 0.93 Summary: - • The article critiques the Trump administration's handling of foreign policy, particularly regarding Israel and Ukraine, suggesting negligence towards humanitarian issues in Gaza. - • It discusses Israel's aggressive actions in Gaza, including the killing and deportation of Palestinians as part of a broader agenda for a Greater Israel. - • The piece highlights statements from Israeli officials, including Bezalel Smotrich, advocating for the complete destruction of Gaza and its population. - • Trump is portrayed as supportive of Israel's actions, praising Netanyahu and downplaying the suffering of Palestinians while focusing on hostages. - • The author notes significant U.S. financial support to Jewish organizations for security, linking it to political contributions aimed at influencing U.S. policy. - • A controversial case involving Tom Alexandrovich, an Israeli government official charged with serious crimes in the U.S., is discussed, raising concerns about judicial favoritism for Israelis. - • The article emphasizes the plight of Gazan children injured in conflict, who were initially granted medical treatment in the U.S. but faced backlash from pro-Israel activists. - • Laura Loomer's influence is mentioned, including her role in pressuring the State Department to block visas for Gazan children, framing them as a national security threat. - • The author concludes by criticizing the moral implications of the Trump administration's policies and the influence of far-right activists on U.S. foreign policy. URL:
The Unz Review
More Ghastly Decisions by the Trump Administration?
 7. Trump Calls For "Peace Agreement" To End "Horrific War Between Russia & Ukraine" | ZeroHedge Why: similarity 0.93 Summary: - • President Trump has called for a "Peace Agreement" to end the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine, emphasizing the need for a resolution beyond a temporary ceasefire. - • Following a summit with President Putin in Alaska, Trump reported positive discussions aimed at addressing the conflict, which has resulted in significant loss of life and destruction. - • Trump stated that Ukrainian President Zelenskyy will visit Washington to further discuss the peace deal, with a potential meeting between Trump and Putin to follow. - • The European Council has expressed support for Trump's initiative, affirming the importance of security guarantees for Ukraine and the necessity for territorial integrity to be determined solely by Ukraine. - • EU leaders pledged continued military and economic support for Ukraine, committing to maintain sanctions on Russia until a lasting peace is achieved. - • Putin claimed that if Trump had been president in 2022, Russia would not have invaded Ukraine, attributing the conflict to the current Biden administration. - • During a joint press conference, both leaders shared an optimistic outlook on finding a resolution, although Putin reiterated Russia's demands regarding territorial concessions and NATO exclusion. - • The summit was marked by a long duration of talks, indicating a commitment to dialogue, with Trump mentioning that few points remain unresolved. - • Trump highlighted the potential for economic cooperation and investment between the U.S. and Russia, suggesting a path forward for both nations. URL:
Trump Calls For "Peace Agreement" To End "Horrific War Between Russia & Ukraine" | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
 8. President Donald Trump as Founding Father of the Newer World Order, by Ron Unz - The Unz Review Why: similarity 0.93 Summary: - **Historical Context**: The document reflects on George H.W. Bush’s 1990 speech promoting a “New World Order” following the Cold War, emphasizing the triumph of Western ideals and the role of the United Nations. - **End of the Cold War**: It highlights the collapse of the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact, marking a significant shift in global power dynamics, with America emerging as the unchallenged superpower. - **America’s Global Dominance**: The US enjoyed unprecedented political, economic, and cultural influence worldwide, with many aspiring leaders looking to American institutions for education and guidance. - **Bush's Missteps**: Bush’s use of the term “New World Order” inadvertently stoked fears among far-right groups, who associated it with conspiracy theories about globalist control, contributing to his electoral defeat in 1992. - **Clinton Administration**: Despite a change in presidency, Bill Clinton maintained a foreign policy similar to Bush’s, continuing America’s commitment to its established international dominance. - **Rise of Trump**: The document posits that Donald Trump is dismantling the existing “New World Order” and replacing it with a “Newer World Order,” significantly altering America’s global role. - **Comparison with the American Revolution**: Trump’s actions are likened to the detrimental impact of King George III's policies, suggesting that Trump’s presidency is facilitating a radical departure from traditional American hegemony. - **Long-Term Trends**: The decline of American dominance is attributed to broader historical trends, particularly the rapid rise of China since the late 1970s, which threatens to reshape international relations. - **The Thucydides Trap**: The document references Graham Allison’s concept of the URL:
The Unz Review
President Donald Trump as Founding Father of the Newer World Order
 ## Pointed questions for discussion - How can Europe balance its security needs with maintaining autonomy from U.S. influence? - What are the potential long-term consequences of the West's approach to Russia? - In what ways can dialogue be reintroduced into the Ukraine conflict? ## Sentiment Score: -0.50 ## Provider OpenRouter / openai/gpt-4o-mini Shared via
Memetic Research Laboratories LLC
Memetic Research Laboratories LLC - Privacy-focused technology for digital content management and decentralized communication
deeznuts 's avatar
deeznuts 4 months ago
Every once in a while you are confronted with how temporary literally everything really is in life It’s a motivator or a de-motivator; you decide
↑