Astonished with how many people are defending censorship/what you can ask an LLM in this HN thread ->

Heretic: Automatic censorship removal for language models | Hacker News

Luckily there are a few people pointing out how flawed their reasoning really is... > Agreed, I'm fully in favor of this. I'd prefer that every LLM contain an advanced setting to opt out of all censorship. It's wild how the West collectively looked down on China for years over its censorship of search engines, only to suddenly dive headfirst into the same illiberal playbook.

Some stats about #asknostr activity: - nr of questions and answers have been going down MoM since January - big increase in zaps for September and October Please note this is using global pagerank by @Vertex to filter out spam. I'm not sure if that is what you have been feeling about Nostr activity? (there is nothing for me to benchmark this against)

Just found out that there are so many good questions on nostr that are not indexed by asknostr.site yet. Using @primal advanced search to look for 'question/who/what/when' keywords + minreplies:5 to find them and forward them. Now i'm thinking to build a bot that zaps people a few sats (21?) if they forward a question that has not been indexed yet. Could be small little growth hack

Playing around with providing LLM answers to asknostr.site questions. Some thoughts i had around implementation: - offer a few (3-5) models with largest variety/style difference (grok, gemini, gpt and deepseek?) - bots are marked as such and thus can be filtered/muted - zapping to the generated answers would top up open router credits (for that model/bot) - bots can be summoned by @mentioning Which models would you like to see?

Is it correct that Primal, regardless which wallet type you use (WebLN, their wallet or NWC) sends ZapReceipts (kind: 9735) ? I'm guessing that ultimately the user would have control over that announcement (silent zaps vs published zaps) in most apps. Are there any other clients that do this for NWC? Any clients that are doing this for Nutzaps ? #asknostr

Does anyone know how to use @fiatjaf `nak` to get all event kinds but not kind:3. I want to debug ZapReceipts, Nutzaps etc, but because i've been following a lot of people lately my latest activity is a LOT of kind:3 content i keep needing to filter out. I know there is `nak filter` but no negative filtering? #asknostr

The anti-crypto playbook in the Europe is so blatantly obvious. - Control the on/off-ramps (through regulation/KYC) - Send a message to developers (Samourai) - Keep feeding the media with FUD stuff (crypto scammers) - Roll out regulation for more control Most people i know associate BTC with Trump or Terrorists. And the ones that don't are programmed to think that BTC = crypto=scam. Not surprised this mass psyop stuff still works, but hope we get to break the pattern

Implementing top zappers for asknostr.site but something is off. This is built using all `kind:9735` events for asknostr content. It feels like these numbers are low. What am i missing? #asknostr

Amen to that: - Fuck the QR Code Menus - Subscriptions Suck Hairy Donkey Balls - Stupid Participation Trophies - Get Rid of ChatBot Customer Service Reps

12 Things I’ve Heard Boomers Say That I Agree With 100%

Come shake your fist at the sky with us…