Banned from dead bird. Fixing anything before fixing money is futile. Anaesthetist & ✝️ father. Building local with npub103a6vk43crw497dlaptwfmhctxqu22mwepshjcvvp29fzwrhtx4q675n6p and farmfoodmap-org.vercel.app
BITCOIN IS MANNA
Manna fed exiles during a transition from slavery to freedom. Both represent an unexpected solution arriving during a time of need from an invisible benefactor requiring discipline and faith to help people move toward greater freedom.
1. Both Arrived at a Moment of Crisis or Need
Manna:
The Israelites were in the wilderness with no stable food source. Manna arrived precisely when survival required something new.
Bitcoin:
Bitcoin emerged in 2009 after the global financial crisis, when trust in traditional banking and monetary policy was collapsing.
Parallel:
Both appeared at a time when existing systems had failed, offering an alternative form of sustenance — physical for one, economic for the other.
2. Both Were “Gifts” That Came From an Unseen Source
Manna:
Its origin wasn’t tied to human labor or agriculture; it “appeared” each morning.
Bitcoin:
Its creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, is anonymous and disappeared, leaving no desire for recognition or compensation.
Parallel:
Each is portrayed as arriving mysteriously — a provision without a visible provider.
3. Both Required Discipline and a New Kind of Behavior
Manna:
People were instructed not to hoard it (except before the Sabbath). They had to trust the daily provision.
Bitcoin:
To benefit, people must understand self-custody, scarcity, and long-term holding (“HODLing”). It requires resisting old habits like trusting central authorities.
Parallel:
Each introduced a new system that demanded new habits, discipline, and trust in unfamiliar rules.
4. Both Functioned as a Test of Faith or Conviction
Manna:
The Israelites had to trust that more would come each day.
Bitcoin:
Early adopters had to believe in digital scarcity before the world did. Believers today often see it as a test of conviction against volatility and skepticism.
Parallel:
Both challenged people to trust something unconventional, especially at the beginning.
5. Both Provided a Foundation for a New Society
Manna:
It sustained the Israelites while they formed a new identity and moved toward a promised future.
Bitcoin:
Bitcoin is seen by many as a foundational layer for a new financial paradigm — decentralized, censorship-resistant, and global.
Parallel:
Each supported the transitional phase of a community moving away from the old world into a new one.
6. Both Are Defined by Rules That No Human Can Change
Manna:
Its properties and schedule were fixed; humans couldn’t modify or force it to appear.
Bitcoin:
The 21 million supply cap, block rules, and emission schedule are immutable and non-negotiable.
Parallel:
In both cases, the “rules” were set by a higher or unseen authority, not by governments or leaders.
7. Both Invited Complaints, Doubt, and Resistance
Manna:
Many Israelites complained, doubted its quality, or wished for old food in Egypt.
Bitcoin:
Early on, many people dismissed it as speculative, worthless, or too strange — some still do.
Parallel:
Radical new forms of provision often generate initial rejection before acceptance.
8. Both Built Communities Around a Shared Belief
Manna:
The Israelites’ shared reliance on manna united them in their journey.
Bitcoin:
Bitcoin has become not just a technology but a culture and movement.
Parallel:
Each created a collective identity rooted in shared values and shared reliance.