GrumpyRabbit's avatar
GrumpyRabbit
GrumpyRabbit@social-teci-world.mostr.pub
npub10qy7...ewu8
Voluntaryist; financial trader; computer scientist; linguist. I'm not here just to "question authority," I'm here to deny the legitimacy of its very existence! The state is the price we pay for failing to build a civilized society. The bigger, more powerful, and more authoritarian the state, the greater the failure. A centrally planned totalitarian state represents a complete defeat for the civilized world, while a totally voluntary society represents its ultimate success.
GrumpyRabbit's avatar
GrumpyRabbit 6 months ago
Even economic sanctions are acts of war. Just ask Japan in 1941. No clause of the Constitution says anything that can fairly be interpreted as equivalent to "The United States shall not commit any acts of war without pre-approval by Congress." Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 grants Congress the sole power to “declare War,” but the Constitution does not define “war” or specify if all hostile, aggressive or violent military actions qualify as acts requiring pre-approval by Congress. Historical precedent shows that Presidents have authorized military strikes without congressional declaration, such as Jefferson’s 1801 Barbary War actions and Reagan’s 1986 Libya strike—among many others. Massie should put his money where his mouth is, and get Congress to vote against war with Iran, or at least sue the administration based on his interpretation of the Constitution (of course, he wouldn't have standing to sue, unless and until Congress votes no.) image
GrumpyRabbit's avatar
GrumpyRabbit 6 months ago
Race and/or ethnicity are not what matter. It's ethical principles, and political philosophy, that do. And those are what should form the basis for political alignment, not surface features.
GrumpyRabbit's avatar
GrumpyRabbit 1 year ago
_BlueSky Is A DISASTER, Leftist Cesspit Is OBSESSED With Death Threats & Adult Material_
GrumpyRabbit's avatar
GrumpyRabbit 1 year ago
_83 years ago today: Pearl Harbor was NOT a surprise_ FTA: “Franklin Roosevelt repeatedly deceived the American people during the period before Pearl Harbor… He was like the physician who must tell the patient lies for the patient’s own good.” The diplomatic record reveals some of what Dr. Roosevelt neglected to include in that now-mythical “Date of Infamy” speech: •Dec. 14, 1940: Joseph Grew, U.S. Ambassador to Japan, sends a letter to FDR, announcing, “It seems to me increasingly clear that we are bound to have a showdown [with Japan] someday.” •Dec. 30, 1940: Pearl Harbor is considered so likely a target of a Japanese attack that Rear Admiral Claude C. Bloch, commander of the Fourteenth Naval District, authors a memorandum entitled, “Situation Concerning the Security of the Fleet and the Present Ability of the Local Defense Forces to Meet Surprise Attacks.” •Jan. 27, 1941: Grew (in Tokyo) sends a dispatch to the State Department: “My Peruvian Colleague told a member of my staff that the Japanese military forces planned, in the event of trouble with the United States, to attempt a surprise mass attack on Pearl Harbor using all of their military facilities.” •Feb. 5, 1941: Bloch’s December 30, 1940 memorandum leads to much discussion and eventually a letter from Rear Admiral Richmond Kelly Turner to Secretary of War Henry Stimson in which Turner warns, “The security of the U.S. Pacific Fleet while in Pearl Harbor, and of the Pearl Harbor Naval Base itself, has been under renewed study by the Navy Department and forces afloat for the past several weeks… If war eventuates with Japan, it is believed easily possible that hostilities would be initiated by a surprise attack upon the Fleet or the Naval Base at Pearl Harbor… In my opinion, the inherent possibilities of a major disaster to the fleet or naval base warrant taking every step, as rapidly as can be done, that will increase the joint readiness of the Army and Navy to withstand a raid of the character mentioned above.” •Feb. 18, 1941: Commander in Chief, Admiral Husband E. Kimmel says, “I feel that a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor is a possibility.” •Sept. 11, 1941: Kimmel says, “A strong Pacific Fleet is unquestionably a deterrent to Japan—a weaker one may be an invitation.” •Nov. 25, 1941: Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson writes in his diary, “The President…brought up entirely the relations with the Japanese. He brought up the event that we’re likely to be attacked [as soon as] next Monday for the Japanese are notorious for making an attack without warning.” •Nov. 27, 1941: U.S. Army Chief of Staff George C. Marshall issues a memorandum cautioning that “Japanese future action unpredictable but hostile action possible at any moment. If hostilities cannot…be avoided, the United States desires that Japan commit the first overt action.” •Nov 29, 1941: Secretary of State Cordell Hull, responding to a speech by Japanese General Hideki Tojo one week before the attack, phones FDR at Warm Springs, GA to warn of “the imminent danger of a Japanese attack,” and urge him to return to Washington sooner than planned.
GrumpyRabbit's avatar
GrumpyRabbit 1 year ago
Americans are being treated like unwanted orphans by those they pay to care for them. It’s actually heart-breaking to watch. ⚡️ image
GrumpyRabbit's avatar
GrumpyRabbit 2 years ago
_Target Sales COLLAPSE Amid Pride BOYCOTT, Sound of Freedom BEATS Indiana Jones, WE ARE WINNING_ Merchants and vendors who aren't being as politically and socio-culturally neutral as possible aren't acting in the best interests of their businesses. PERIOD. So why do they do it?