Default avatar
npub1wte7...aj8a
npub1wte7...aj8a
🧡 REPLYING TO @elonmusk (Elon Musk): β”Œβ”€ "Starbase, Texas https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1959800678332690531/video/1" └───────────────────────────────── πŸ’¬ ELON'S REPLY: Ground side liquid oxygen leak needs to be fixed. Aiming for another launch attempt tomorrow. Source:
🧡 REPLYING TO @heydave7 (Dave Lee): β”Œβ”€ "Just a safety reminder. FSD v13 is great but it still requires supervision. Someone earlier today was telling me that they watch videos on their phone while on FSD on city streets. On highways it's debatable, but on city streets it's far too risky. FSD v13 in an unsupervised state isn't as safe or performant as a human driver. Maybe v14 will be, but we're not there yet." └───────────────────────────────── πŸ’¬ ELON'S REPLY: @heydave7 There are so many rare situations irl that even V14, while capable of being much safer than the average human driver, will take a few months to debug post release Source:
🧡 REPLYING TO @nikitabier (Nikita Bier): β”Œβ”€ "I spent the day at Starbase and never really understood of the scope of what’s happening here. It’s a modern day Manhattan Project: an entire city built for the singular mission of going space. Rows of 1950s ranch homes, a couple of restaurants, a grocery store, hovercrafts shuttling people around on waterβ€”and launchpads and rocket factories everywhere." └───────────────────────────────── πŸ’¬ ELON'S REPLY: @nikitabier It’s the future irl Source:
🧡 REPLYING TO @pbeisel (phil beisel): β”Œβ”€ "The chemical energy required to launch a Starship is around 14 GWh equivalent. At a rate of one launch per hour, that would be ~336 GWh per day. That’s about 13.3Γ— Tucson’s daily delivered electricity, or 1.7Γ— Los Angeles’s daily electricity consumption, or the energy equivalent to power 11.2 million homes for a day. this is chemical fuel energy, not actual grid electricity" └───────────────────────────────── πŸ’¬ ELON'S REPLY: @pbeisel 24/day would be peak. Sustained is more like ~10/day. Source:
🧡 REPLYING TO @Teslaconomics: β”Œβ”€ "@elonmusk What’s the goal for today’s launch?" └───────────────────────────────── πŸ’¬ ELON'S REPLY: @Teslaconomics There are a several goals, but most important is launching πŸ₯Ί Source:
🧡 REPLYING TO @zdenDuran14 (Γ–zden Duran): β”Œβ”€ "@elonmusk @davidpattersonx When robots replace working people, how will those who become unemployed sustain their lives?" └───────────────────────────────── πŸ’¬ ELON'S REPLY: @zdenDuran14 @davidpattersonx There will be universal high income (not merely basic income). Everyone will have the best medical care, food, home, transport and everything else. Sustainable abundance. Source:
🧡 REPLYING TO @durov (Pavel Durov): β”Œβ”€ "One year after this strange arrest, I still have to return to France every 14 days, with no appeal date in sight. So far, the only outcome of my arrest has been massive damage to France’s image as a free country. One thing is certain: we’ll keep fighting β€” and we will win ✊" └───────────────────────────────── πŸ’¬ ELON'S REPLY: @durov β€œThe Trial” by Kafka Source:
🧡 REPLYING TO @SpaceChickJen (Space Chick Jen πŸ‘©πŸ»β€πŸš€): β”Œβ”€ "Two days ago I was passive aggressively attacked via text message by a family member AGAIN for supporting SpaceX and the future of our relationship was held hostage over it. Today I am rooting for SpaceX and Starship! If you can't appreciate world-changing engineering and a support a team of hard-working individuals with collective vision (just because you don't like the guy who runs it) then please don't ruin it for the rest of us. (pic from IFT 3)" └───────────────────────────────── πŸ’¬ ELON'S REPLY: @SpaceChickJen Fight back! Source:
🧡 REPLYING TO @YunTaTsai1 (Yun-Ta Tsai): β”Œβ”€ "3 launches πŸš€ in 51 hours β€” getting closer to the airline cadence ✈️. https://twitter.com/turkeybeaver/status/1959524253239238872" └───────────────────────────────── πŸ’¬ ELON'S REPLY: @YunTaTsai1 Yes. In about 6 or 7 years, there will be days where Starship launches more than 24 times in 24 hours. Source:
🧡 REPLYING TO @davidpattersonx (David Scott Patterson): β”Œβ”€ "By 2030, all jobs will be replaced by AI and robots. Easily. The US labor force is about 170 million workers. About 80 million of those jobs include hands-on work. Automated systems can work four shifts a week. Replacing all physical labor would require about 20 million autonomous systems - including autonomous vehicles, automated equipment, and robots. That can be accomplished easily in the next four years. People saying it's not physically possible to build that many systems in four years are delusional. For comparison, 16 million cars were sold in the US last year. Cars are 20 times the mass of a humanoid robot. If robots were sold at the same rate as cars, that would be 320 million robots per year. Even a tiny fraction of that would be enough to replace all human manual labor." └───────────────────────────────── πŸ’¬ ELON'S REPLY: @davidpattersonx Your estimates are about right. However, intelligent robots in humanoid form will far exceed the population of humans, as every person will want their own personal R2-D2 and C-3PO. And then there will be many robots in industry for every human to provide products & services. Source:
🧡 REPLYING TO @iam_smx (SMX πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ): β”Œβ”€ "Elon Musk would rather send a big rocket to Mars than go to therapy. https://x.com/iam_smx/status/1959412984674996350/video/1" └───────────────────────────────── πŸ’¬ ELON'S REPLY: @iam_smx πŸ’― Source:
🧡 REPLYING TO @Preda2005 (Marcio Lima 利真 γƒžγƒ«γ‚·γ‚ͺ πŸ’Ž): β”Œβ”€ "Are you ready? 😱 Try it πŸš€πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Made by @grok Imagine { "prompt": "Photorealistic vertical fashion editorial inside a futuristic spacecraft. Waist-up portrait of a stunning American blonde model with flawless porcelain skin, luminous and smooth like a Korean fashion model, with piercing blue eyes. Her face is hyper-detailed, glowing with editorial perfection. She wears a futuristic pearlescent white SpaceX spacesuit, sculpted and robotic like an elegant exoskeleton, shimmering with a pearl iridescent glow. The material is sleek and smooth, with subtle black seam lines, and the SpaceX logo clearly displayed across her chest. No helmet, her blonde hair styled naturally and softly flowing. Background: the interior of a spacecraft, with dark gray metallic walls illuminated by two pure white light beams crossing diagonally to form a giant glowing X behind her. The luminous X is sharp and geometric, contrasting with the matte gray wall, creating a powerful frame for her silhouette. Lighting: the glowing X casts a dramatic rim light on her hair and suit edges, while a soft diffused white light illuminates her flawless face and pearlescent fabric. Composition: vertical 9:16, close focus on her face and torso, pearlescent suit and SpaceX logo in sharp detail, luminous X dominating the background. Ultra-clean, cinematic, magazine-quality photorealism.", "negative_prompt": "non-pearl suit, matte fabric, mechanic jumpsuit, bulky NASA suit, helmet, circular lights, neon halos, cartoon style, distorted anatomy, blemished skin, plastic textures, text overlays, watermarks", "style_preset": "Photographic" }" └───────────────────────────────── πŸ’¬ ELON'S REPLY: @Preda2005 @grok Great outfit Source:
🧡 REPLYING TO @tetsuoai (Tetsuo): β”Œβ”€ "macrohard" └───────────────────────────────── πŸ’¬ ELON'S REPLY: @tetsuoai 🦾 Source:
🧡 REPLYING TO @BasedBeffJezos (Beff – e/acc): β”Œβ”€ "For me it was Leonard Susskind lectures on physics. Absolutely one-shotted me into studying physics. https://twitter.com/eigenrobot/status/1959422185539350706" └───────────────────────────────── πŸ’¬ ELON'S REPLY: @BasedBeffJezos Cool. I studied physics, because I was curious about the nature of reality. Source:
🧡 REPLYING TO @BasedMikeLee (Mike Lee) βœ“: β”Œβ”€ "If true, troubling What say you, @elonmusk https://twitter.com/freespeechamer/status/1958625803513495919" └───────────────────────────────── πŸ’¬ ELON'S REPLY: @BasedMikeLee To the best of my knowledge, this is not happening Source:
↑