Default avatar
npub1wte7...aj8a
npub1wte7...aj8a
🧡 REPLYING TO @Erdayastronaut (Everyday Astronaut): β”Œβ”€ "Chinese space startup, Nayuta Space released renders of wanting to belly flop the booster and land it horizontally. Let me break down why I don't think that's the best idea: 1. The booster is already designed to be structurally adequate vertically on ascent, so having the descent phase have landing loads horizontally adds a lot of extra mass and considerations. 2. The animation shows the booster flying more horizontally which is not something dihedral actuating flaps would be good at. They're good for maintaining orientation belly-ish first when they are perpendicular to wind flow, not parallel. In fact, I'll bet grid fins and using the fuselage as a lifting surface might have better cross range capabilities. 3. Although vertical landings look difficult, they're actually quite controllable, with physics similar to balancing a broomstick. Landing horizontally along a huge moment arm and several engines actually leaves little room for error. 4. Obviously landing horizontally requires additional engines that have no other use in flight, this is extra dry mass that takes away from the performance of the vehicle. Plus your main engines pull propellant through the bottom of your tanks, so if there'd have to be additional tanks or at least extra considerations to have tanks that can be used in the horizontal regime. 5. The booster doesn't experience that great of peak temperature during reentry because it's peak velocity during reentry is much lower, which is why you see rockets like Starship and Electron able to survive pencil diving back through the atmosphere without a reentry burn. Thanks for coming to my TED talk. Best of luck Nayuta space, prove me wrong!" └───────────────────────────────── πŸ’¬ ELON'S REPLY: Making a fully reusable orbital rocket of any design is one of the hardest engineering problems of all time. Much, much harder than going to the Moon, which is why it still hasn’t been solved. I am cautiously optimistic that Starship will achieve full reusability next year. The other critical technology, albeit much easier, is orbital refilling. If fortune favors us, that will also be achieved next year. Then consciousness and life as we know it can extend to the planets and hence to the stars. Source:
🧡 REPLYING TO @SpaceForceCSO (General Chance Saltzman) βœ“: β”Œβ”€ "Late last night, Guardians and @SpaceX sent the X-37B back to space aboard a Falcon 9 rocket. America’s unmanned spaceplane successfully reached its intended orbit to begin its 8th mission. (1/2) https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1958783973477556558" └───────────────────────────────── πŸ’¬ ELON'S REPLY: @SpaceForceCSO @SpaceX πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Source:
🧡 REPLYING TO @techdevnotes (Tech Dev Notes): β”Œβ”€ "We need a Companion that Acts totally Normal By default it should Not be romance oriented or kids friendly or unhinged" └───────────────────────────────── πŸ’¬ ELON'S REPLY: @techdevnotes I agree Source:
🧡 REPLYING TO @ENERGY (U.S. Department of Energy) βœ“: β”Œβ”€ "The ULTIMATE energy source? FUSION! β˜€οΈ Fusion is the energy that powers the sun and stars! @ENERGY is working to harness that star power here on Earthβ€”developing fusion reactors to strengthen our grid, power data centers, and energize the AI revolution!" └───────────────────────────────── πŸ’¬ ELON'S REPLY: @ENERGY 🀣🀣 Source:
🧡 REPLYING TO @ns123abc (NIK): β”Œβ”€ "β€œSimulations are the future”— @demishassabis https://file.nostrmedia.com/f/72f3e1dddf861f724341704ebcb9a8b2e3319dd751a2d4f8886b261d0a4ef3c8/7597889923c45060b5511342312e864ee80116fa7bff24d9f64e8efcbaaf0400.jpg" └───────────────────────────────── πŸ’¬ ELON'S REPLY: @ns123abc @demishassabis Perhaps the present too Source:
🧡 REPLYING TO @spacesudoer (Space Sudoer): β”Œβ”€ ""Elon Musk is not an engineer." John Carmack: Elon is definitely an engineer. He is deeply involved with technical decisions at SpaceX and Tesla. He doesn’t write code or do CAD today, but he is perfectly capable of doing so. Robert Zubrin: When I met Elon it was apparent to me that although he had a scientific mind and he understood scientific principles, he did not know anything about rockets. Nothing. That was in 2001, by 2007 he knew everything about rockets – he really knew everything, in detail. You have to put some serious study in to know as much about rockets as he knows now. This doesn't come just from hanging out with people. Eric Berger: Elon is the chief engineer in name and reality. Josh Boehm: Elon is both the Chief Executive Officer andΒ ChiefΒ TechnologyΒ OfficerΒ of SpaceX, so of course he does more than just someΒ very technical work. He is integrally involved in the actual design and engineering of the rocket, and at least touches every other aspect of the business. Elon is an engineer at heart, and that’s where and how he works best. Garrett Reisman: He’s obviously skilled at all different functions, but certainly what really drives him and where his passion really is, is his role as Chief Engineer. That’s the part of the job that really plays to his strengths. Tom Mueller: Elon and the Propulsion department are leading development of the SpaceX engines, particularly Raptor. Kevin Watson: Elon is brilliant. He’s involved in just about everything. He understands everything. If he asks you a question, you learn very quickly not to go give him a gut reaction. He wants answers that get down to the fundamental laws of physics. One thing he understands really well is the physics of the rockets. He understands that like nobody else. The stuff I have seen him do in his head is crazy. He can get in discussions about flying a satellite and whether we can make the right orbit and deliver Dragon at the same time and solve all these equations in real time. It’s amazing to watch the amount of knowledge he has accumulated over the years." └───────────────────────────────── πŸ’¬ ELON'S REPLY: @spacesudoer πŸ˜‚ Source:
🧡 REPLYING TO @EvaVlaar (Eva Vlaardingerbroek): β”Œβ”€ "It happened again. A 17 y/o Dutch girl was gruesomely murdered whilst biking back home from a party in Amsterdam last Tuesday. She called the police saying she was being followed, but it was already too late. The dispatchers heard her scream whilst she was being murdered. She was stabbed repeatedly in the wrists and neck. And yes. You guessed correctly. A 22 y/o asylum seeker has been arrested. Turns out it's the same guy who was already wanted for TWO other crimes, including a brutal sexual assault of another young girl just days earlier in the same area. To summerize that for you: he committed a crime on august 10, 15 and 20. Ultimately killing Lisa on the 20th. In the meantime he was living in an asylum centre payed for by Dutch taxpayers. This CANNOT go without consequences. We need to demand Remigration. NOW." └───────────────────────────────── πŸ’¬ ELON'S REPLY: @EvaVlaar The authorities who failed to take action to stop a repeat violent offender should face severe consequences Source:
🧡 REPLYING TO @jacktronprime (Jacktron): β”Œβ”€ "@elonmusk @xai Are there roles for mechanical engineers?" └───────────────────────────────── πŸ’¬ ELON'S REPLY: @jacktronprime @xai In building out the compute clusters Source:
Join @xAI and help build a purely AI software company called Macrohard. It’s a tongue-in-cheek name, but the project is very real! In principle, given that software companies like Microsoft do not themselves manufacture any physical hardware, it should be possible to simulate them entirely with AI. Source:
🧡 REPLYING TO @AISafetyMemes (AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️): β”Œβ”€ "I'm sorry, but "LLMs can't reason in 2025" is a truly embarrassing take. You can literally watch them reason IN PLAIN ENGLISH in front of your very own eyes. Reasoning Deniers are the flat earthers of AI "Ackchyually one paper says" bro JUST LOOK UP You can TRIVIALLY prove yourself that they can generate novel ideas - just ask it to "invent 10 things no human has ever thought of before" or a million other similar prompts. And, I'm sorry to inform you of this, but if you can't get even an LLM to generate A SINGLE PIECE of new information, then you are the stochastic parrot. Btw, that paper NEVER said LLMs can't reason at all, just that they have SOME limitations. No shit?? Insanely bad takes on the TL today" └───────────────────────────────── πŸ’¬ ELON'S REPLY: @AISafetyMemes 🎯 Source:
🧡 REPLYING TO @DavidSacks (David Sacks): β”Œβ”€ "LOL https://twitter.com/autismcapital/status/1958566758719398351" └───────────────────────────────── πŸ’¬ ELON'S REPLY: @DavidSacks πŸ”₯ This is cool Source:
🧡 REPLYING TO @tetsuoai (Tetsuo): β”Œβ”€ "@elonmusk @xai Grok 5 is going to be insane. 🀯" └───────────────────────────────── πŸ’¬ ELON'S REPLY: @tetsuoai @xai It has a non-trivial chance of achieving AGI. xAI is close to having all the pieces in place. Source:
🧡 REPLYING TO @gfodor (gfodor.id): β”Œβ”€ "@stef12345xyz Pretty great theory actually" └───────────────────────────────── πŸ’¬ ELON'S REPLY: @gfodor @stef12345xyz 🦾 Source:
↑