If you wanted to control bitcoin you would add regulations, surveillance, bad press, CBDCs, Saylors, ETFs, or try a hard fork.
But you would never think of infiltrating Core.
Interfacing with AI linearly through a chat is suboptimal for many tasks. At some point we will look back and ask ourselves how we worked like this.
Moreover, the default chat experience is bad in itself:
- Answers as walls of text, so you have to hunt for the useful or actionable bits
- Language that feels foreign and most (normal) work colleagues would ever use
When you aggregate hundreds of these interactions daily (not to mention context switching - another topic) it becomes exhausting.
I am no UX designer but experimenting with a non-linear, interactive mode for working on documents, as well as a "slop condom" skill that takes the best of: caveman, fuck slop, the ADHD one, and simplified technical English.
Both can work independent of each other but put together looks promising.
BIP-110 appears to potentially cause issues while not actually fixing the spam problem, but I don't know enough.
What I do know is there are many shady characters behind anti-BIP-110, and that raises suspicion.
I doubt bitcoin will survive long term. It's too dependent on humans.
Just like you couldn't fabricate a covid global hysteria in 1950, you can't change bitcoin consensus today.
If inflation ever becomes a thing of past generations, that culture can (and will) be brainwashed into changing consensus "for the greater good" or whatever.
Physical gold might still be a thing, though.
I hope I'm wrong.