It's touching to see so many “experts” discovering #Monero just now that #privacy is the latest trend. How incredible it is that some people fail to understand that this is not a fad but a paradigm shift. Keep staring at the price of XMR with that look of amazement on your faces; it's fun to watch speculators play at being visionaries. Wait until 2029, when the utility finally slaps those who today believe that privacy is just an Instagram filter in the face.

The dilemma of efficiency and freedom for the average individual. -Technocracy takes away freedom to give them efficiency they didn't ask for. -Anarchism takes away efficiency to give them freedom they don't know how to use.

FROM INVISIBILITY TO DAMAGE MANAGEMENT: WHY YOUR HARDWARE WON'T SAVE YOU I see many posts and articles talking about the wonders of anti-surveillance hardware, or great software that respects privacy, and okay, that's part of it, but believing that it's the salvation is the biggest mistake because it puts you at a disadvantage. It makes you let your guard down, thinking that you have no responsibility of your own. We live in a state of permanent connection, where digital surveillance methods are multiplying every day. Faced with this siege, absolute invisibility is a fantasy. Real privacy isn’t an impregnable bunker; it is the intelligent management of exposure. The first step is reducing correlation. You must fragment your activity. Use different browsers for different tasks and isolated apps for specific services. If everything happens in the same place, you become an easy puzzle to solve. True privacy is about predictable exposure. It is not about giving zero data, but about knowing exactly what you are handing over. Privacy is the end of surprises; if you don't know what you are giving away, you are the product. This requires controlled failure through compartmentalization. If one of your accounts is compromised, the damage will be limited to that account. A fire in the kitchen shouldn't burn down the entire house. Adopt a philosophy of deliberate use. Technology should be a scalpel, not a vital organ. Use it when needed, disable it when not. The "default" mode is the tracker's best friend. Always remember the hierarchy of defense: behavior comes first, identity comes second, and hardware comes last. If your habits are poor, the most secure hardware in the world is just an expensive paperweight. No tool will save you from yourself. Privacy is a daily practice, and it starts with how you browse, not with the box a product comes in.

#TechnocracySeries –Episode 10 ᴬⁿᵃˡʸᶻᵉ ʰⁱˢᵗᵒʳʸ ᵗᵒ ᵘⁿᵈᵉʳˢᵗᵃⁿᵈ ᵗʰᵉ ᵖʳᵉˢᵉⁿᵗ ᵃⁿᵈ ᵃⁿᵗⁱᶜⁱᵖᵃᵗᵉ ᵗʰᵉ ᶠᵘᵗᵘʳᵉ PRAXIS: THE WORLD’S FIRST DIGITAL NATION IN GREENLAND The next nation-state might not be born from a revolution, but from a venture capital round. Welcome to Praxis, Peter Thiel’s blueprint for turning Greenland into the first technocratic enclave of the 21st century. Silicon Valley is tired of asking for permission. Figures like Thiel and Andreessen view modern democracy as an obsolete system that stifles innovation. Praxis is their prototype for a "City-State" engineered specifically for the tech elite. Why Greenland? It’s more than just open space. The massive heat generated by AI superclusters requires the Arctic cold for efficiency. Praxis seeks to merge territorial sovereignty with data center optimization—a nation that runs like an operating system. The approach is purely technocratic: replacing politics, which relies on consensus and debate, with engineering, which focuses on results and optimization. In Praxis, laws aren't argued; they are programmed via smart contracts and code. The power connection is absolute. With Ken Howery—a Thiel partner—on the diplomatic board, the Trump administration’s interest in Greenland isn't real estate; it’s strategy. They are eyeing a "Special Economic Zone" outside Danish control. Praxis champions the "Network State" concept: a community that organizes online before purchasing land to materialize. It represents the ultimate privatization of sovereignty, where the citizen functions primarily as a user or shareholder. The risk is clear: the creation of a utopia for the few that ignores Greenland’s local reality. A glass technocracy in the middle of the ice, extracting critical minerals and processing data while the rest of the world grapples with traditional bureaucracy. Tech oligarchs will begin to draw their own borders. Praxis in Greenland is the ultimate experiment. If code is law, who holds the power to press "Reset"?

Praxis

Praxis is building new cities to support those solving the world's hardest problems

The Red Shield Family -January 1988: "Get Ready For a World Currency" (see 2018 on the coin, 30 years earlier) -2008: Satoshi Nakamoto publishes the Bitcoin white paper (20 years after that publication) and a month after Lehman Brothers went bankrupt; the "ashes" of the financial system (the burning banknotes on the magazine cover) were a tangible reality. -2017 (December): Bitcoin futures are launched on the CME (Chicago Mercantile Exchange), days before 2018. -2018: Christine Lagarde (then head of the IMF, now president of the European Central Bank) gave a historic speech in Singapore entitled "Winds of Change: The Case for New Digital Currency" (exactly 30 years since the publication of The Economist) -2018: Fidelity Investments (one of the world's largest asset managers, with trillions under management), started with custody so that institutional investors could trade Bitcoin. -2024: BlackRock legitimizes the asset in January (giving it the financial seal of approval) and Trump legitimizes the asset in July (giving it the political and national security seal of approval). -2028: ? (40 years after the magazine's publication) Which family is linked to The Economist? Which banking family is believed to be pulling the strings behind the scenes at most central banks? Coincidences? Connect the dots. ᴿᵒᵗʰˢᶜʰⁱˡᵈ

Zcash Development Team Resigns En Masse as Governance Dispute Rattles ZEC Price

Bitcoin News

Zcash Development Team Resigns En Masse as Governance Dispute Rattles ZEC Price

Uncover the details behind the Electric Coin Company's resignation and its impact on the future of Zcash and ZEC prices.

My L3 Analysis 👇 Layer 1: The Surface What is visible: On January 7, 2026, the entire team at Electric Coin Company (ECC)—the primary developer behind Zcash—resigned en masse. CEO Josh Swihart publicly stated they were victims of "constructive discharge" by the board of Bootstrap (the non-profit organization that controls ECC). Immediate Impact: The market reacted with panic, triggering a 17-19% drop in the ZEC price (trading around $404). Swihart announced the formation of a new company with the same team to continue the mission, assuring that the technical protocol remains unaffected. Layer 2: The Depth Data and Mechanics of the Conflict: The conflict is not about code, but about corporate structure and control. The Structure: Zcash operates under an unusual model where a non-profit (Bootstrap) owns the commercial entity (ECC). This creates an inherent tension between "non-profit mission" and "business operation." The Actors (ZCAM): Swihart specifically pointed to board members Zaki Manian, Christina Garman, Alan Fairless, and Michelle Lai (referred to as "ZCAM") as responsible for imposing impossible working conditions and being "misaligned" with the mission. Historical Metadata: ECC has historically been the custodian of the Zcash brand and the primary recipient of the Development Fund. The rupture suggests a dispute over the flow of funds or control of the brand assets. Layer 3: The Hidden Structure Vulnerabilities and Intelligence Synthesis. Legitimacy Schism: There is a high risk of community confusion. Who is "Zcash" now? The board holding the legal structure (Bootstrap) or the team that built the technology (ex-ECC)? This pattern often predicts social or technical hard forks. Development Paralysis? Governance Fragility? MORE CENTRALIZATION

Money is the greatest fiction created in modern human history because it has managed to hack into the human biological incentive system. The direct pursuit of resources has been replaced by the pursuit of the symbols that represent those resources. The tokenization of money is the most advanced evolution of this fiction. Therefore, whoever has the ability to create or destroy these symbols at will not only controls the economy; they control the life force of humanity, deciding who prospers and who is enslaved by debt.

Hey, put aside your fanaticism and think critically. #Bitcoin has become part of the visible and accepted structure of the financial system. #Monero operates outside the rules of control and oversight. If Monero is a glitch in the Matrix, then what? In terms of the movie: Bitcoin is Zion as designed by the Architect: a controlled way to release pressure, but still within the system's equation. Monero is the code that allows for true disconnection.

#TechnocracySeries –Episode 8 ᴬⁿᵃˡʸᶻᵉ ʰⁱˢᵗᵒʳʸ ᵗᵒ ᵘⁿᵈᵉʳˢᵗᵃⁿᵈ ᵗʰᵉ ᵖʳᵉˢᵉⁿᵗ ᵃⁿᵈ ᵃⁿᵗⁱᶜⁱᵖᵃᵗᵉ ᵗʰᵉ ᶠᵘᵗᵘʳᵉ THE FABIAN SOCIETY Orwell and Huxley weren't prophets; they were scribes. Aldous Huxley was George Orwell's French teacher. Huxley knew too much. He came from the British intellectual aristocracy. His grandfather was T.H. Huxley ("Darwin's bulldog"), and his brother, Julian Huxley, was a prominent evolutionary biologist, eugenicist, and the first director-general of UNESCO. Julian did share many goals with the Fabian Society's vision of a scientifically guided society. A British socialist organization founded in London in 1884, which functions as a think tank. The Fabians are a key piece of the Technocracy puzzle. They weren't seeking a violent, Marxist-style revolution, but rather a gradual, slow, and administrative transformation of society. Aldous didn't need to imagine what a scientific dictatorship would be like; he listened to his brother and colleagues discuss biology, population control, and human standardization as casually as if they were talking about the weather. Orwell (Eric Blair) defined himself as a democratic socialist. Shortly before his death, Orwell sent a copy of 1984 to his former teacher. Huxley replied with a famous letter (dated October 21, 1949) that is a gem of political prophecy. Essentially, Huxley told him: "Your book is brilliant, but you're wrong about the method." His argument was: "The boot on the face (your method) is inefficient. In the future, rulers will discover that it's easier to control people through conditioning and pleasure (my method in Brave New World) than through pain." Huxley's Brave New World (1932) and Orwell's 1984 (1949) share a common theme: technocracy. We are monitored, as in 1984, but we are willingly distracted, as in Brave New World.

Cunningham's Law (Information Gathering) The best way to get the right answer on the internet is not to ask a question, it's to post the wrong answer. The Hack: Instead of asking on a Linux forum, “How do I configure my firewall?”, I wrote, “Linux is garbage, it's impossible to configure a decent firewall, Windows is better.” Why it works: People are lazy when it comes to helping others, but they have a compulsive need to correct others and demonstrate intellectual superiority. Experts will come out of the woodwork to give you the exact step-by-step configuration just to prove you wrong.

Eighty percent of the text is usually useless filler that editors ask authors to include. When you're reading to learn—whether it's technical books, essays, or heavy articles—stop reading cover to cover. Leave the linear stuff for novels. Don't waste your time; the goal is to extract the concentrated knowledge, because you’re going to forget the fluff anyway. That’s how you really absorb ideas. Lean on AI for smart summaries. Use duck.ai This “saving” of time allows you to think. Focus on reflecting on the content. Here, take this prompt as a starting point: "Review this text and remove all words that do not contribute to the central mechanism of the story. Use short, declarative sentences. If a word can be removed, remove it. No frills, no filler. Keep only the essentials. Submit it to me for review, and then: 1. Identify the three most valuable ideas and briefly explain why. 2. Reveal any unspoken assumptions or blind spots, and what you would change if they were wrong. 3. Find three ideas that challenge intelligently, that are credible but unexpected."

What do democracy, communism, and fascism have in common? They are all variants of the same state social engineering. #Technocracy is no different; it is simply an update of the same control, but scaled up with algorithmic precision software.

What do you notice in Satoshi Nakamoto's first public email introducing Bitcoin?

Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper

Do you value #privacy and digital sovereignty? Windows is one of the worst enemies. Use Linux. Not a programmer? Nowadays, that's no problem at all. Use Duck.ai and Venice.ai to learn and configure Linux. In fact, it's much lighter for any hardware, requiring fewer resources. It's one thing to use AI as an assistant, but it's another for AI to control your every move and be the telemetry management model for Microsoft... WITH YOUR INFORMATION! Watch this video.

Odysee

How (and Why) to Switch to Linux - #SolutionsWatch

SHOW NOTES AND COMMENTS: https://corbettreport.com/how-to-switch-to-linux/

I recommend Koodo Reader for digital reading. It is open-source, with versions available for various OS, including desktop, mobile, and web, as well as different options for cloud synchronization for reading from any of these versions. Very versatile in its configuration.

Koodo Reader

Your modern ebook reading experience

After winning the FIFA Peace Award, DJ bombed Syria, Nigeria, and Venezuela in one week.

Surprised? I'm not. I have published several articles on LN ⚡ A Trojan horse. This is just the beginning.

RESONANCE AND CONTROL: THE HIDDEN ARCHITECTURE OF A GLOBAL WIRELESS FUTURE ᴬⁿᵃˡʸᶻᵉ ʰⁱˢᵗᵒʳʸ ᵗᵒ ᵘⁿᵈᵉʳˢᵗᵃⁿᵈ ᵗʰᵉ ᵖʳᵉˢᵉⁿᵗ ᵃⁿᵈ ᶠᵒʳᵉˢᵉᵉ ᵗʰᵉ ᶠᵘᵗᵘʳᵉ Although Starlink is currently used for data, its satellite infrastructure is the perfect basis for an orbital power transmission system. Musk has already mentioned that "all energy will be solar," and space is the best place to collect it. Layer 1: The Surface (The Visible) What we see today are fascinating technological breakthroughs: companies like Emrod or WiTricity successfully making electricity "jump" without wires. The official narrative focuses on convenience and sustainability: eliminating copper (extractive mining), bringing power to remote areas, and streamlining the transition to electric vehicles. It is presented as the natural evolution of Wi-Fi: if data is free to move, energy should be too. Layer 2: The Depth (The Hidden Context) Beneath the innovation lies a war of patents and standards. Wireless technology is not "free" in its current implementation; it is tied to closed protocols and proprietary hardware. Furthermore, there is a context of security and sovereignty: a global power transmission system via microwaves or lasers from space is, intrinsically, a potential directed-energy weapon. The same infrastructure capable of powering a city from orbit also has the technical capacity to incinerate a target if the beam is redirected. Controlling these "transmission frequencies" is the new geopolitical battlefield. Layer 3: The Hidden Structure (Incentives and System Logic) Why is the surface (green innovation) highlighted while the depth (control and weaponry) is concealed? The system's logic is the centralization of the node. Tesla's original dream was decentralization (energy harvested from the environment), which is incompatible with the current economic model based on scarcity and billing. The "surface" is promoted because it keeps the end-user dependent on a subscription model ("Energy-as-a-Service"). The "depth" is hidden because public acceptance of a global wireless power grid would collapse if it were perceived as a satellite network with strike capabilities. The incentive is to monetize vibration, transforming a natural physical phenomenon into a service controlled by a few actors, under the guise of technological progress.

YOU WILL BE DIGITIZED. SCIENCE FICTION? The singularity is the hypothetical point where an #AI exponentially improves itself, surpassing human intelligence and transforming civilization irreversibly and unpredictably. AI would reproduce to evolve. Different AI entities could likely be created independently. Ray Kurzweil and other "singularity theorists" believe that the singularity will allow the human mind to be transferred to a digital medium or connected online to the digital cloud. If this is possible, the line between human and machine disappears. You will coexist in a kind of augmented reality with several autonomous AIs. The great scientific question is: Would you be you in the computer, or just a perfect digital copy that believes it is you while your original consciousness fades away?

BROWSERS: INTEGRATED AI VS. AGENTIC AI The web landscape in 2026 is defined by two distinct approaches to artificial intelligence: browsers with integrated AI, or Agentic AI browsers. Browsers with integrated AI, such as Brave with its Leo assistant, Edge with Copilot, or Chrome with Gemini, act as sophisticated co-pilots. Their role is primarily analytical and passive: they summarize long articles, explain complex code, or suggest replies based on the page you are currently viewing. They enhance your reading and comprehension without taking control of the interface. In contrast, Agentic AI browsers (like Perplexity Comet or OpenAI’s Atlas) represent a paradigm shift toward execution. These tools don't just "talk" about the web; they operate it. They can autonomously navigate multiple tabs, fill out complex forms, and execute multi-step tasks—such as booking a complete travel itinerary—by interacting directly with the website's underlying code. Best Practices for the AI Era: -Do not use browsers with agentic AI regularly; only use them for specific purposes. They are riskier, both because they are prone to errors in their agency and because they are more vulnerable to privacy issues. They are also unsafe due to prompt injection attacks. -Manual Confirmation: Always require a final human "click" before an agent processes a payment or submits sensitive data. -Context Awareness: Disable AI agents when handling banking, healthcare, or confidential corporate credentials. -Data Minimization: Use privacy-focused tools like Brave's Leo for daily tasks, as they often process data with higher anonymity than full agentic models.