I talked a lot about exactly this lately. Naive American bitcoiners getting shafted by their corrupt politicians and still cheer for them because it pumps their bags. Here's what Matt Kratter has to say...

WTF is this proposal to accomplish? Buy 1 mil bitcoin with fiat first and then sell it to serve ever increasing fiat debt? So they wanna hodl it, wait for an increase in in fiat price terms and then sell it to whom - other countries for dollar, other countrie's fiat or to their own citizen or to whom? How does this decrease debt, the amount of dollar worldwide stays the same, right? This is fucking nuts, they haven't even thought about that, they just wanted to quickly please the gullible crowd with the big words of a "bitcoin reserve". It's the same old old: keeping the dollar system "intact" and superior.

Feat. the Great Pumpkin sponsored by Metaplanet grifter David F. Bailey aka The Shitcoiner - head of Bitcoin Magazine !

Why does nobody expose this fake ai generated shell company Metaplanet Inc. and the shilling of their shares by Bitcoin Magazine and its founder David Bailey as well as fellow shitcoiners Yusko and LeClair with the involvement of UTXO Management?

Metaplanet

Metaplanet - Bitcoin Treasury Company

Japan's premier Bitcoin treasury strategy company and the nation's largest corporate holder of Bitcoin.

CSW written judgment dripping with sarcasm: "SUMMARY 1. Dr Craig Steven Wright (‘Dr Wright’) claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto i.e. he claims to be the person who adopted that pseudonym, who wrote and published the first version of the Bitcoin White Paper on 31 October 2008, who wrote and released the first version of the Bitcoin Source Code and who created the Bitcoin system. Dr Wright also claims to be a person with a unique intellect, with numerous degrees and PhDs in a wide range ofsubjects, the unique combination of which led him (so it is said) to devise the Bitcoin system. 2. Thus, Dr Wright presents himself as an extremely clever person. However, in my judgment, he is not nearly as clever as he thinks he is. In both his written evidence andin days of oral evidence under cross-examination, I am entirely satisfied that Dr Wright lied to the Court extensively and repeatedly. Most of his lies related to the documents he had forged which purported to support his claim. All his lies and forged documents werein support of his biggest lie: his claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto. 3. Many of Dr Wright’s lies contained a grain of truth (which is sometimes said to be the mark of an accomplished liar), but there were many which did not and were outright lies. As soon as one lie was exposed, Dr Wright resorted to further lies and evasions. The final destination frequently turned out to be either Dr Wright blaming some other (often unidentified) person for his predicament or what can only be described as technobabble delivered by him in the witness box. Although as a person with expertise in IT security, Dr Wright must have thought his forgeries would provide convincing evidence to support his claim to be Satoshi or some other point of detail and would go undetected, the evidence shows, as I explain below and in the Appendix, that most of his forgeries turned out to be clumsy. Indeed, certain of Dr Wright’s responses in cross-examination effectively acknowledged that point: from my recollection at least twice he indicated if he had wanted to forge a document, he would have done a much better job. 4. If Dr Wright’s evidence was true, he would be a uniquely unfortunate individual, the victim of a very large number of unfortunate coincidences, all of which went against him,and/or the victim of a number of conspiracies against him. 5. The true position is far simpler. It is, however, far from simple because Dr Wright has lied so much over so many years that, on certain points, it can be difficult to pinpoint what actually happened. Those difficulties do not detract from the fact that there is a very considerable body of evidence against Dr Wright being Satoshi. To the extent that it is said there is evidence supporting his claim, it is at best questionable or of very dubious relevance or entirely circumstantial and at worst, it is fabricated and/or based on documents I am satisfied have been forged on a grand scale by Dr Wright. These fabrications and forgeries were exposed in the evidence which I received during the Trial. For that reason, this Judgment contains considerable technical and other detail which is required to expose the true scale of his mendacious campaign to prove he was/is Satoshi Nakamoto. This detail was set out in the extensive Written Closing Submissions prepared by COPA and the Developers and further points drawn out in their oral closing arguments."