Don't ever forget: NO politician has your interests at heart. They thrive of the corrupt fiat system. They WILL betray you no matter what they say now to get your vote - not opportunistic Kennedy, not convicted felon Trump and not senile Biden. Don't waste your vote and don't waste your bitcoin on this lying sacks of shit.

BREAKING NEWS ! CSW received a bloody nose and is humiliated by written judgment confirming he's Faketoshi:

Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

COPA -v- Wright - Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Neutral Citation Number: [2024] EWHC 1198 (Ch)Claim Nos. Il-2021-000019; Il-2022-000069 In the High Court of JusticeBusiness and Property Courts of...

CSW written judgment dripping with sarcasm: "SUMMARY 1. Dr Craig Steven Wright (‘Dr Wright’) claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto i.e. he claims to be the person who adopted that pseudonym, who wrote and published the first version of the Bitcoin White Paper on 31 October 2008, who wrote and released the first version of the Bitcoin Source Code and who created the Bitcoin system. Dr Wright also claims to be a person with a unique intellect, with numerous degrees and PhDs in a wide range ofsubjects, the unique combination of which led him (so it is said) to devise the Bitcoin system. 2. Thus, Dr Wright presents himself as an extremely clever person. However, in my judgment, he is not nearly as clever as he thinks he is. In both his written evidence andin days of oral evidence under cross-examination, I am entirely satisfied that Dr Wright lied to the Court extensively and repeatedly. Most of his lies related to the documents he had forged which purported to support his claim. All his lies and forged documents werein support of his biggest lie: his claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto. 3. Many of Dr Wright’s lies contained a grain of truth (which is sometimes said to be the mark of an accomplished liar), but there were many which did not and were outright lies. As soon as one lie was exposed, Dr Wright resorted to further lies and evasions. The final destination frequently turned out to be either Dr Wright blaming some other (often unidentified) person for his predicament or what can only be described as technobabble delivered by him in the witness box. Although as a person with expertise in IT security, Dr Wright must have thought his forgeries would provide convincing evidence to support his claim to be Satoshi or some other point of detail and would go undetected, the evidence shows, as I explain below and in the Appendix, that most of his forgeries turned out to be clumsy. Indeed, certain of Dr Wright’s responses in cross-examination effectively acknowledged that point: from my recollection at least twice he indicated if he had wanted to forge a document, he would have done a much better job. 4. If Dr Wright’s evidence was true, he would be a uniquely unfortunate individual, the victim of a very large number of unfortunate coincidences, all of which went against him,and/or the victim of a number of conspiracies against him. 5. The true position is far simpler. It is, however, far from simple because Dr Wright has lied so much over so many years that, on certain points, it can be difficult to pinpoint what actually happened. Those difficulties do not detract from the fact that there is a very considerable body of evidence against Dr Wright being Satoshi. To the extent that it is said there is evidence supporting his claim, it is at best questionable or of very dubious relevance or entirely circumstantial and at worst, it is fabricated and/or based on documents I am satisfied have been forged on a grand scale by Dr Wright. These fabrications and forgeries were exposed in the evidence which I received during the Trial. For that reason, this Judgment contains considerable technical and other detail which is required to expose the true scale of his mendacious campaign to prove he was/is Satoshi Nakamoto. This detail was set out in the extensive Written Closing Submissions prepared by COPA and the Developers and further points drawn out in their oral closing arguments."

Judgement is out for Craig Steven Wright and it's a humiliation in front of the world and a punch to his feisty face : "Dr Wright presents himself as an extremely clever person. However, in my judgment, he is not nearly as clever as he thinks he is." https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/COPA-v-Wright-Judgment.pdf

Reddit banned me today (!) for reporting a shitcoin scam 2 month ago (!). I apparently "abused" their reporting tool. The thing is - my supposed rule 8 violation has nothing to do with reporting, it's about tampering with their code (https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/360043512931-Don-t-break-the-site). An appeal was rejected with the same shitty response. Fuck centralized social media, fuck X and fuck Reddit! Nostr is the only way to go!

Heh, European plebs - use your 100€/month fee-less opportunity to stack sats with relai.app - your bitcoin-only Swiss exchange (like Swan but a bit smaller and w/o KYC). Use code "XBT" for a 0.5% reduction in fees when stacking above this fee-less limit.

https://blog.wasabiwallet.io/zksnacks-is-discontinuing-its-coinjoin-coordination-service-1st-of-june/ Fuck the IRS, fuck the DoJ, fuck the SEC and fuck the whole US gov in particular - and I'm not even a Yank!

Cancelled my lawn mower order w/ Amazon and bought a scythe instead. The money I saved (€230) goes into bitcoin.

Somebody care to explain? Is the user count on Primal's Explore tab the user count for Primal only and is the pubkey count the worldwide count of all users having "registered" with Nostr because there's such a huge discrepancy between 1.6m and 36m.