halalmoney's avatar
halalmoney
halalmoney@stacker.news
npub1vdaz...7rjz
Freedom. Justice. #Bitcoin https://stacker.news/r/halalmoney
halalmoney's avatar
halalmoney 2 months ago
*the reason you will eventually grow out of forums is that they are search queries written by other people. LessWrong was summoned into existence by Eliezer Yudkowsky and Robin Hanson writing a sequence of exceptionally powerful search queries (on Overcoming bias), blog posts so strong that the networks they created survived the exodus of the original nodes. This is what online writing is at its limit—the summoning of a new culture. If we squint a little, we could even say that this is how the internet itself came into existence. In 1963, J. C. R. Licklider wrote a memo about an “intergalactic computer network”, and that search query was so powerful it summoned the aliens. We’re all living inside his search query now.*
halalmoney's avatar
halalmoney 2 months ago
*The way the machine seemed to work was: The more precise and niche the words I input, the better the internet would match me with people I could forge meaningful relationships with. This precision was hard for me, partly because my sense for how communication is supposed to work is shaped by reading mass media. Writing for a general public, you need to be broad and a bit bland. I didn’t want a general public. I wanted a specific set of people, the people who could help me along as a human being obsessed with certain intellectual problems. I didn’t know who these people were. I only knew that they existed. Hence my writing was a search query. It needed to be phrased in such a way that it found these people and, if necessary, filtered others. The pleasant parts of the internet seemed to be curated by human beings, not algorithms. For my writing to find its way in this netherworld, I needed to have a rough sense of how information flowed down there. The pattern was this: words flowed from the periphery to the centers. This was a surprisingly rapid stream. Then the words cascaded from the center down in a broader but slower stream to the periphery again.*
halalmoney's avatar
halalmoney 2 months ago
*who's going to invest the substantial sums required to manufacturing opensource chips at economical scale? National security states won't make it easy even if there were groups with enough resources to do it... a lot of people will fall out of windows or at least find themselves indicted over a parking ticket if they try undermining the ability to track everyone everywhere all the time* image
halalmoney's avatar
halalmoney 2 months ago
*The adversary doesn’t need to defeat you. They just need to price you. Find the number where you’ll compromise. The threat where you’ll go quiet. The pressure point where principle becomes negotiable.* View quoted note →
halalmoney's avatar
halalmoney 2 months ago
*…the fiat operator doesn’t see the system itself as the problem. They see individual data points. Individual market movements. They’re orienting toward symptoms while ignoring the disease.* View quoted note →
halalmoney's avatar
halalmoney 2 months ago
*the bigger question is, would you be willing to sacrifice your own wealth for the greater good? Because I can only assume bitcoin would lose a tremendous amount of its value if governments became fiscally responsible* View quoted note →
halalmoney's avatar
halalmoney 2 months ago
*On Nostr, Bitcoin exhibits its most fundamental property: programmable liquidity in motion. It doesn’t merely exist on a balance sheet. It transmits information, signals preference, and facilitates exchange without intermediation* View quoted note →
halalmoney's avatar
halalmoney 2 months ago
On nostr, *You’re not discussing freedom. You’re forging it. Every note. Every relay. Every zap. Every follow. Every repost.* View quoted note →
halalmoney's avatar
halalmoney 2 months ago
*Vince Lanci delivered a sobering assessment of Bitcoin's current trajectory in our latest conversation. Drawing from his decades of experience watching similar dynamics play out in precious metals markets, Vince argued that the US government is attempting to co-opt Bitcoin through the ETF structure. He explained that by creating spot Bitcoin ETFs, approximately 70% of Bitcoin's liquidity shifted from international markets into US-controlled venues. This wasn't accidental—it's the same playbook used with gold futures in 1974. The government doesn't need to own Bitcoin to control it; controlling the liquidity pool is sufficient. Through margin requirements, settlement rules, and regulatory mechanisms, the US now dominates Bitcoin's price discovery. Vince emphasized that this control doesn't mean Bitcoin will fail, but rather that its path forward has fundamentally changed. The US liquidity network is so powerful that even without malicious intent, it naturally becomes the dominant force in any market it touches. For Bitcoin, this means the derivative price now matters more than spot, enabling the same rehypothecation schemes that suppressed gold for thirty years.* TFTC
halalmoney's avatar
halalmoney 2 months ago
*It is a move that does sort of play in our favor with helping prevent China from moving into the space that would be open if we did nothing. Argentina does have a wide variety of natural resources that would make investments into it not the worlds worst idea*