"I believe I will be successful!"
Sure...
Roman Simon
re4mat0r@nostrz.org
npub1vqfw...awwd
Thinker. Explorer. Speaker. ₿usinessman. Sharing deepest insights from my personal experience.
No one is interested in how to build success. Everyone is interested in how to magically win success.
Did you know that when you grow up and become a man you're supposed to stop wearing underwear. Unless you are gheeyyy.
The only thing more abundant than gold and silver is fiat currencies.
Women are more submissive and easier to control than men. This is why men are being transformed into women slowly.
Everyone on the farm has their roles. And every role has its requirements. Therefore only those who can fulfill the role and act as necessary can occupy it.
If you are not satisfied with your position in the world and your life, perhaps you don't have the qualities necessary to occupy the role you want.
It's not about the fairness of the world. It's about who you are.
THE MARKET IS READING YOU
In the past — long before the internet, AI, and extreme global centralization — financial markets were far more decentralized. There was no single dominant intelligence observing everyone at once. Markets were shaped by many independent participants: traders, institutions, countries, and local economies. Price was the result of their collective actions, not of a single coordinating force.
During that time, traders developed ways to interpret price movement. By studying charts, volume, macroeconomic conditions, and geopolitical events, they noticed recurring patterns in how markets behaved. Over time, this evolved into a shared “language” — technical analysis, market structure, and behavioral signals. Traders who understood this language could coordinate implicitly, without ever communicating directly.
When a recognizable buy signal appeared, traders who could read it bought — and because enough of them acted in the same direction, the price rose. When a sell signal appeared, they sold — and the price fell. This worked precisely because the language was not universally understood. Only a relatively small group which was sufficient to move the market could read it correctly. Outsiders — ordinary people and most inexperienced traders — could not participate effectively and often lost money as a result.
That environment no longer exists.
Today, markets are highly centralized, monitored in real time, and deeply integrated with AI systems. Massive entities — institutions, funds, exchanges, and state-aligned actors — have full visibility into market positioning, order flow, leverage, sentiment, and crowd behavior. They do not need to guess what traders are thinking. They know exactly.
The objective has changed. The goal is no longer to follow patterns, but to exploit them. Modern systems analyze where the majority of participants are positioned and then move the market in the direction that extracts the most money from them.
If most traders are long, price is pushed down. If most are short, price is pushed up. Classical patterns still appear — but they exist largely to lure participants into predictable positions.
Because of this, no pattern is sacred anymore. Any setup can fail. Any “textbook” signal can be invalidated instantly if breaking it is more profitable than respecting it. Markets can move in ways that appear irrational, chaotic, or disconnected from fundamentals — yet they remain perfectly rational from the perspective of profit extraction.
The only true constraint is efficiency. The system always seeks the path that generates the maximum gain with the minimum expenditure of energy, capital, and risk.
This is why markets now move in what seem like arbitrary cycles — psychological waves of fear and greed, narrative-driven hype, sudden geopolitical “events”, and rapid sentiment reversals.
But even these cycles are not purely organic. Narratives shape perception. Perception shapes behavior. Behavior shapes positioning. And positioning determines where the market will move next. The masses believe they are reacting to reality, while in truth, reality is being constructed around their reactions.
This is why trading today is no longer about “reading the market” in the old sense. The market is reading you. 

Forces that control the world have similar interests and their incentives align, therefore they collaborate.
Common people don't have any interests and just follow their instincts, therefore they fight each other.
Gold is only safe heaven asset if you don't understand money. It's abundant even on Earth, but in cosmos, it's unlimited. Governments buy it because they spend money created from nothing. Any individual who spends his time to create value and then buys gold is absolutely dumb and was deceived. Anything infinite can't be a good store of value.
It may seem like a good idea to follow people you find entertaining, but that is a trap that will prevent you from growing and becoming smarter. You can only enjoy what you are already capable of perceiving. It is like going to the gym and lifting only the weights you find comfortable and enjoyable.
Imagine believing that water should behave nicely and not spill all over the floor when you turn a glass — then you try it, it spills, and you become enraged, calling the world unfair.
Karma is real, you just misunderstood it. Whenever you believe and submit you get exploited. That's karma.
I'm currently doing 60-hour dry fast. Interesting experience. And very beneficial, as many say. I'll see soon.
Most mental and physiological health problems will dissappear if you eat real food, are active physically and have sufficient sleep, and communicate with new people.
The system benefits when you simply trust — anything and everything. The system does not care if you get burned. An obedient society will continue to exist and can be exploited. This is why trust is promoted and rational thinking is ridiculed.
But an individual — you — is harmed by trust most of the time, even when it is used only with the closest people.
Every time you rely on trust, there is a chance of harmful consequences. Use trust repeatedly, and exploitation becomes inevitable.
Your mind can think and develop effective strategies for interaction. You just need to understand that you need it.
The battle is not between political parties or countries. The battle is in our minds between malicious parasitic indoctrination and our purpose and survival instincts.
Listen — how much do you value your life? There is no amount of money that could justify giving it up. Right?
Your life is infinitely precious, and negotiating its value is meaningless and foolish.
The most valuable thing in the universe is already yours. You can choose to use it consciously and take control of it — or you can surrender it and let it be exploited by others.
The choice is yours.
A computer is a very interesting and unique device. The way it operates depends entirely on the software installed on it. The computer has no understanding of reality and can interact with it only in the ways you allow — by connecting it to networks, sensors, or other mechanisms. By itself, it has no clue about anything.
You can install very strange kinds of software on a computer. You can create virtual worlds inside its “mind”, and the computer will treat these virtual realities as real, because it cannot distinguish between actual reality and simulated ones. Whoever programs the computer determines its behavior and its fate.
The same is true for the human mind. 

FREEDOM REQUIRES RESTRICTION
The more free you want to become, the more you need to restrict yourself. How can this be true?
There are different kinds of freedom: philosophical, theoretical, physical, moral, biological, and others. Each of these describes a specific type of freedom, and each works differently.
If you are stuck on a basic, animalistic, biological level — like a dog, for example — and operate from that perspective, the only freedom you will seek is biological freedom. Dogs are free in that sense. They do whatever they want. They run around, eat whatever they find, and relieve themselves wherever they decide. But are dogs truly free?
From a biological perspective, yes — they are free, because they do what they want. But from all other perspectives, they are extremely limited. Because they do not restrict themselves, nature limits them.
If you live your life on autopilot — routinely doing whatever you want, eating whatever you want, sleeping whenever you want, chasing pleasure and avoiding discomfort — you will be like the dog. You may feel free, and you may be biologically free, but reality will severely limit you. You will only be able to do basic things and interact with the world only on the level it allows you.
If you are more aware and understand this concept, you go deeper. You start thinking about freedom differently — philosophically. If you want to interact with people, influence them, and affect outcomes, you need power.
Take money as an example. To gain it, you must limit your biological freedoms and desires. You must focus, delay gratification, and create value. When you do this, you actually become more free, because you gain leverage and power to affect reality and other people. So by restricting yourself, you become more free.
When you think about this deeply, you realize that freedom and limitation are tightly connected and inversely proportional. The more you restrict yourself for pursuit of freedom, the more freedom you gain.
The only real question is: how much freedom do you want, and what kind? Because there is also theoretical freedom, which has no limits — and pursuing limitless abstractions can disconnect you from limited, real-world reality.
— Warrior's Path 

Everyone knows that mathematics allows you to calculate things — but does it really?
It only allows you to calculate things if you actually use it yourself and understand how the calculation is done. When mathematics is treated merely as a word or an abstract concept, something strange happens.
For example, if someone tells you that they calculated something and gives you the result, you tend to accept it as true. You know that mathematics can produce correct results, and you assume that since they used mathematics, the outcome must be correct. But in this situation, you are not using mathematics — you are using belief.
If you write down the numbers, apply the formulas yourself, and understand how the process works, you are actually calculating reality. You can verify the result. But if you simply enter numbers into a calculator or ask an AI chatbot and accept the output, you are not doing mathematics — you are believing.
You may believe the result is correct, but without understanding and performing the calculation yourself, you can never be certain that it is true.
This is exactly how delusional and fake realities are created: when belief replaces understanding.