If the next MK7 is organized by the bad actor (AJS), I won't attend the event, and I'll also warn all my friends and speakers (whom I know) that AJS is nothing but a bad actor.
Tweet by @BawdyAnarchist_
----
MoneroKon "Emergency Meeting"
---
There's broad consensus that
@OrangeFren
did great with MK6, and he's the clear favorite to organize MK7.
@ajs_xmr
unanimously lost a vote that *he* called for MK7 organizer, but then 2 days later, literally went rouge. With no warning, started kicking various people from groups he controls (many of which have nothing to do with MK), killed the MoneroKon room <--> IRC bridge, and today shut off the MK servers.
He called an "emergency meeting," falsely framing this as "profit vs non-profit." However, he abandoned his obligation to organize MK6 and had minimal involvement with MK5. When
@OrangeFren
proposed to pick up the torch, organizing MK6 on a compressed timeline and assuming the full entrepreneurial risk,
@ajs_xmr
consented.
@ajs_xmr
also proposed a personal compensation of ~$40k for himself for MK7 (now it's an hourly-rate proposal), and has plans for *his own* LLC to conduct MK7.
---
Importantly: There's consensus that a pure-volunteer model has become untenable due to growing size. Spearheading Kon is huge time investment. So it's not even a contentious proposition that *someone* will make profit/income for their efforts. This is reasonable.
However,
@ajs_xmr
framing this as "profit vs non" is a red herring and hypocritical. Another crucial false framing, is that a narrow group voted to "convert MK into a privately controlled commercial enterprise." We absolutely did not. We ONLY voted that
@OrangeFren
organize MK7 (a vote ajs organized).
---
Setting aside his unprofessional and legally-questionable behavior, a diverse group of participants have converged on the core of the issue. MoneroKon is creative-commons. Anyone may use the name. However, there are socials, domains, and infrastructure which are under ajs exclusive control. The main proposition is this:
**Stewardship/control of these resources should be separated from entities organizing MoneroKon.** The steward should be skilled with infra, and grant access to future MK organizer(s) based on community sentiment.
I'm writing this post, because on Saturday, at 1600 UTC, the "emergency meeting" ajs demanded, will commence in:

---
My hope is that we can remain focused on the primary issues at hand, and not be distracted by red herrings.
1. Should control of the infra/socials be separated from entities organizing future MoneroKons?
- Which physical person and backup will be the primary custodians for the MK resources?
- Should the secondary custodians that
@ajs_xmr
kicked, be fully restored on all infra he controls?
- Discussion regarding incentives/structure, to motivate good faith by the primary custodians.
2. Does the community wish to restore
@OrangeFren
's access to the MK socials/website, for the purposes of organizing MK7?
----