and just like that, absolutely no one noticed

it is forking time

Regardless of your stance on spam, BIP-110 “UA”SF was a horrible idea. It will likely fail anyway. The only thing it achieved is confuse people and polarize them further. Congratulations. (My opinion is that we should not encourage it, by blocking it via *relay policy*. People don’t want to build on uncertain ground. But consensus should not be changed.)

is anyone selling popcorn for sats? View quoted note →

Rule 1 of security research: until it is fixed and properly disclosed, you NEVER: - share the details - post what you found a vuln in - actually, just keep your mouth shut and don’t say a word

1. Make new model 2. Release 3. Quantize and lobotomize it 4. goto 1

Am I even surprised View quoted note →

Note that EAL5/6 certification means absolutely nothing about the security of a hardware wallet,

It seems that many people on Nostr just want to pretend to be devs just for grant money and nothing else.

In cryptography the best way to check if you are sufficiently skilled yet, is if you feel like you know a lot but also nothing at the same time

gm Nostr If you are concerned about BIP-110: don’t be You cannot lose sats unless you try to play both sides of the fork. It is impossible.

About this entire AI security scanning thing: 1. Why are people using $ spent as a metric? 2. A huge chunk of these vulnerabilities are likely hallucinated and/or overstated 3. You can’t just point AI at a pile of files and expect good results

Warrant canaries are security theater

I find my feed is better if I immediately mute anyone who posts AI slop. GM.