I cannot find a single person outside of Nostr who wants to actually use AI vibeslop vomit. Maybe because they care that their software works, and is not blasting them with AI overexplanation syndrome?

If you are concerned about the BIP-110 fork and your LN node: don’t As long as you do not care about the fork-coins (in either side), nothing changes for you. You need to take 0 action.

There are two types of AI users: - Those who use Pi - Those who don’t use Pi yet, but won’t switch back once they do

It seems that we are now in the part of the bubble where AI companies try to profit. In a year, the price of models has gone up 3x for OpenAI models, for example. This has especially impacted nano and mini models. Same with Gemini, 2.5 => 3.1 going up in price 5x for output tokens.

gm nostriches 🤔

AI has worsened the problem of armchair experts. The only people that benefit from you publishing your unverified and crappy slop of any form, whether it be text, code, images or video, are the AI companies squeezing you for $$$ Please stop polluting the internet with garbage that is not even worth the fraction of a cent worth of disk space it occupies. View quoted note →

It appears now on Twitter, a random idiot with an AI tool has gained traction by writing an article longer than STM32 reference manuals about a BIP-110 vulnerability. However, the vulnerability was completely hallucinated (this post is not in favor of/against BIP-110)

Instead of more clients/features/infra/whatever, there needs to be more things developed long-term and focused on stability. The state of Nostr usability has barely improved pre and post AI slop, if anything it got worse.

Good morning