@calle, irrational exuberance aside, what's your take on respectable opinions taking the stance against lifting OP return limits, such as below:

The Fight for Bitcoin's Soul: Adam Back Warns Against Rise of 'JPEG Spam'

The Blockstream CEO says image inscriptions undermine Bitcoin’s role as money and offer miners only negligible profit in return.

This is not a matter to be dismissed as demagoguery as @Adam Back is one of the key figures in Bitcoin space.

If one's expectation is cryptographic protection from provider compromise (the classical E2E promise), MLS does not deliver it in practice. For privacy and control, consider systems built around individual public key agreement with robust verification (SimpleX, #Nostr, Signal’s ratchet-based groups) or decentralized multi-server architectures. Use MLS only where its scalability and modular design are needed and where you fully understand and can mitigate the provider trust requirement. View article →

Decentralize justice: opt-in rules, private enforcement, Bitcoin time-stamps for charters, votes, and audits. Incentives + verification > monopoly + opacity.

Can I just run #bitcoin core 29.0.0 with my own settings and not be called a retard by both camps?

Truth be told, I am running Core 29.0.0, and, I reckon, I'll be running it for the next few years unless some serious vulnerabilities are found within it.