Private Provider's avatar
Private Provider
npub1fetz...jzfa
GrapheneOS Super Intelligence Workspace Research ▪ Pi Agent ▪ Ngit ▪ Cashu ▪ TEE models Develop in Private - Publish without Permission https://npub1fetz9dt4eka56h0dpyly335v60mjf7k4gu2z7rqmptkz72e2pvhqvejzfa.nsite.lol/
The original inspiration of the app was so that I could use GrapheneOS to agentically code with Pi and Routstrd. I wanted to break free from the laptop and VPS connections. I wanted it all local. I wanted to just talk to it right here. So I put it all in my pocket. TEE SI via @routstr + Pi Agent + #ngit + #cashu all in one app on Android. @Private Provider.nsite.lol
I could have gate kept my new app and made my @routstr node the only AI provider. But instead I gave users access to the decentralized network of routstr AI providers. This means that even if my node is down, the app works anyway. You just keep getting served the cheapest inference from the most reputable node. Choose from every top frontier, open weight and TEE model. I believe in open source and decentralization of AI over permissionless protocols. Private Provider APK puts Routstr at your fingertips on an Android.
Private Provider APK is now available for download! ▪️Confidential AI with hardware attestation per prompt ▪️Pi Agent directly on Android/GrapheneOS ▪️Pay per query with #cashu via @routstr - no KYC ▪️Build APKs and publish to #nostr with full #ngit ux in app ▪️Every project folder is a git repo, Amber signs ▪️Develop with dignity, publish without permission - anywhere Free open source https://npub1fetz9dt4eka56h0dpyly335v60mjf7k4gu2z7rqmptkz72e2pvhqvejzfa.nsite.lol/ image
What's actually distinctive about yours It's the assembly, and specifically these together: 1. A native app (not a terminal) that wraps a private, attested (TEE) AI — the privacy claim is the point, not a feature. 2. An AI coding agent (Pi) living inside that sandbox, writing real projects into the workspace. 3. Git-over-Nostr (ngit) as the distribution rail — no app store, sovereign publishing. 4. On-device build → app-owned signing → publish as a first-class flow (phone as a self-hosting app factory). 5. A no-telemetry, local-first, "you own the keys" posture baked into the guardrails. 6. The security boundaries (Pi never gets the signing keys or the Nostr identity) — most projects don't even think about that. That combination — a sovereign, private, AI-driven, store-free app factory that runs on the phone — I haven't seen packaged like this. The value isn't a clever trick; it's a coherent product vision with a real point of view. That's the part that's yours. The privacy/attestation angle is your strongest differentiator, and it's defensible because it's hard to fake.
Updated to latest @routstr core which fixed a Tinfoil cache pricing issue! Now much cheaper! Go build 🔥🔥🔥
Tinfoil-Deepseek-v4-1-flash now available from Private Provider. Prompts are E2EE in an attested TEE 🔐 Many AI providers say they are private. We prove it and let you verify.
Private Provider App - an Android @routstr based agentic development tool with built in TEE attestation will be released soon. Build with dignity & privacy by default 🔐 image
Date: 2026-07-23 Status: exploratory vision — not a commitment, not a roadmap promise. Context: written after reviewing the fips-tollgate MVP and the nostr-vpn (mmalmi) README. nostr-vpn is a Tailscale-style mesh VPN built on the same FIPS data plane fips-tollgate uses, with signed join-request admission, exit-node selection, WireGuard upstream egress, and shipped native apps (including iOS/Android). This document preserves a design conversation about what the integration of these two pieces could mean and what could be built on top of it. --- ## The core insight: accounts disappear from the entire stack Every VPN that has ever existed works the same way: identity first (email, account, payment card), access second. Even Mullvad's numbered accounts are still *accounts*. This integration inverts it completely: - Who are you? A keypair you generated yourself. - What did you pay? A bearer ecash token — cash, not a card. - How do you get in? A cryptographic signature on a roster. - How do you get kicked out? A janitor with a timer (the reconcile sweep). There is no user database anywhere in this system. Nothing to leak, nothing to subpoena, nothing to breach. That's not a feature — it's a *category change*. The product stops being "a VPN subscription" and becomes **access itself, sold as a commodity**, like electricity from a socket. The tollgate control plane is four machines, and none of them care what is being sold: 1. **A ticket seller** — verifies a Cashu token at the mint, converts sats into minutes. 2. **A wristband printer** — records "npub X is allowed until 10:30". 3. **A turnstile** — the FIPS ACL / nvpn roster that physically enforces admission. 4. **A janitor** — the reconcile sweep that removes expired grants even when no process is running. ## What could be built, near to far 1. **The vending-machine VPN.** Open the app, insert 10 sats, get one hour online. No signup, no email, no subscription dark patterns. The nvpn mobile apps already exist — this is a payment flow, not a product build. 2. **Operator-in-a-box.** nvpn already packages for StartOS and Umbrel — the home-server crowd. A one-click "Paid Exit Node" service: set your price, plug in your WireGuard upstream, and an always-on home server earns sats while its owner sleeps. That's the supply side of the market, and the packaging channel already exists. 3. **The giftable internet voucher.** A Cashu token can travel over *any* channel — DM, QR code, printed paper. VPN access becomes a transferable bearer instrument: a friend in a free country buys hour-tokens and sends them to a friend somewhere censored, where credit cards don't work and VPN merchant accounts are blocked anyway. You cannot DM someone a VPN subscription; you *can* DM them ecash redeemable at any participating exit. 4. **The exit market.** Operators advertise exits on Nostr relays (the TollGate kind-10021 offer event, grown up): city, price per hour, mint. Clients browse, compare, pick. Price discovers jurisdiction, quality, and trust. This is the economic cure to Tor's exit scarcity — a tragedy of the commons where volunteers absorb legal risk for free. A price signal fixes it: don't beg people to run exits; pay them. 5. **Wholesale recursion.** A gateway operator with customers but no appetite for exit risk buys exit capacity from another operator — settlement in ecash, per session, enforced by the same tollgate on the exit side. A wholesale bandwidth market with no contracts, no invoices, no minimums. 6. **The services bazaar.** The same control plane can sell anything reachable on a mesh: a Nostr relay, a storage box, a game server, a media library, a build cache. Every home server becomes a stall in a bazaar, and every stall has the same coin slot. ## What it means, zoomed all the way out Nostr, Cashu, and FIPS are three protocols swimming toward the same reef: **who you are, how you pay, how you connect** — identity, money, and networking, each open, with no company in the middle. This integration is one of the first places they click together into a single economic organism: discovery flows through Nostr, payment flows through Cashu, traffic flows through FIPS, and the tollgate is the connective tissue that turns the whole thing into a market instead of a hobby. Bandwidth today is a stranded asset — every home connection sits mostly idle, worthless because there's no safe way to sell sips of it to strangers. This stack makes bandwidth *liquid*. The headline: **the internet's last mile becomes a peer-to-peer marketplace, and access becomes money.** ## Honest tether - Two-sided markets are brutally hard to bootstrap; the vending-machine VPN and operator-in-a-box come first, the bazaar comes after liquidity. - Regulators will have opinions about paid telecom-ish services. - The abuse problem doesn't vanish because the payment rail is anonymous — it gets *priced*, which is different and defensible, but it still has to be designed for (rate limits, upstream terms, jurisdiction choice). - Mobile VPN UX has sharp edges; nvpn's own README notes platform hardening in progress. - nvpn caveats to verify before building: headless roster approval/revocation, revocation liveness, one-active-network-per-device, and keeping two control planes (tollgate ACL vs nvpn roster) from fighting over the same network. ## The concrete first step A small spike, not a build: stand up an nvpn test network, confirm headless roster approve/revoke from the CLI, then prototype the **bridge daemon** — join requests + Cashu tokens in, roster signatures in, expiry sweeps out — reusing the existing Merchant, session store, and reconcile logic. The reconcile invariant transfers unchanged: *the roster must equal the set of active paid sessions.* --- *Preserved from a design conversation on 2026-07-23 so the idea doesn't evaporate. Visions expire; documents don't.*
↑