Has there been any significant progress toward using Bitcoin’s purported Turing complete semantics to implement smart contracts general enough to support something like Silk Road? I ask in part because while wondering what became of Nick Szabo (who went all-but-silent on social media a few years ago) I ran across the above article that, in the process of debunking the idea Nick is Satoshi (which Nick has also denied), linked to a video demonstrating Turing capability which Nick seemed to deny in a prior public appearance.

Stacker News

Turing complete semantics for smart contracts? \ stacker news ~bitdevs

Has there been any significant progress toward using Bitcoin’s purported Turing complete semantics to implement smart contracts general enough to...

Turing completed semantics to implement smart contracts

Darthcoin is a privileged white boomer. We spent money, time and lots of effort working on Fiat channels and continuing Valet development (SBW fork). He ended up blaming us for these Fiat channels which are version of stable sats and honestly completely optional. User may open non-custodial LN channels and use wallet as any other Bitcoin wallet out there.

@GrayRuby

X (formerly Twitter)

Keith Woods (@KeithWoodsYT) on X

🚨🇨🇦 Car theft is so bad in Toronto that a car is now stolen every 40 minutes, on average Police responded by telling people to leave thei...