Hello Nostr! I'm making a serious attempt at trying to use Nostr more, and to make it more useful for myself as a social media platform.
What is the best way to follow the most high signal accounts the quickest? What about how to filter out the noise? Any other tips generally?
I mostly use @primal on desktop if it matters.
Luke de Wolf
luke@primal.net
npub1fk8h...cwld
Monetary Maxi. Running Knots. Running DATUM.
Co-host of the Bitcoin Infinity Show
Co-author of Bitcoin: The Inverse of Clown World
Co-founder of BTC HEL
Ok I'm giving Nostr another serious try.
The latest episode of the Freedom Footprint Show is out now! #[1] and I discuss bitcoin, mathematics, praxeology, property rights, and the fragility of society and civilization with #[0], author of “The Progressive Case for Bitcoin”. Discover more about his views and book now 👇🏻
Find the episode on 👇🏻
Fountain:
Apple:
Spotify:
YouTube:
Find the episode on 👇🏻
Fountain: 
Fountain
Fountain
Discover millions of podcasts and emerging artists worth supporting. Powered by RSS, Lightning and Nostr.
Apple Podcasts
The Progressive Case for Bitcoin with Jason Maier - Freedom Footprint Show 26
Podcast Episode · The Bitcoin Infinity Show · 04/04/2023 · 1h 23m
Spotify
The Progressive Case for Bitcoin with Jason Maier - Freedom Footprint Show 26
The Bitcoin Infinity Show · Episode
Well today is fun. PV Nostrland!
Last week, I asked Nostr (and Twitter) for the best resources about Bitcoin mining's environmental impact. The goal is to use these resources to help orange-pill an environmentally focused friend. I've reviewed everything, and here are some of the best resources🧵👇
First up: the articles. Articles are a great way to convey a specific piece of information while being both informative and including enough detail to get to the nuance. Here are many of the best articles I found on the topic:
1. #[0]'s @#[0] Bitcoin energy piece. This is a comprehensive overview of Bitcoin's energy usage, from Bitcoin's purpose to why proof of work is necessary. Well written and easy to read, this is one of the best articles on the topic.
2. RFI Response: Climate Implications of Digital Assets by Margot Paez and Troy Cross through the Bitcoin Policy Institute.
This paper is a response to common FUD, in this case from the US government. It covers the key points and is full of links for further research.
https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/627aa615676bdd1d47ec97d4/62f41b9ce54e014f9869efa7_OSTP.docx.pdf
3. Bitcoin: Let's Start from Scratch by #[1] @#[1]
A ground up orange pill article directly aimed at the environmental side of things. One of many great articles by Daniel, but he recommends to start with this one and I agree. Check everything out on his website regardless!
4. The Humanitarian and Environmental Case for Bitcoin by Alex Gladstein @#[2]
Alex Gladstein has multiple excellent articles from the humanitarian perspective of Bitcoin, and this one covers the environmental side very well too. I suggest reading all of his major pieces, and he has a book coming out that I'm very much looking forward to!
5. Bitcoin Mining and the Environment by #[3] @#[3]
High level thoughts from #[3] on the topic of Bitcoin mining and the environment. More compact than the others, and includes references from the Bitcoin Mining Council.
6. Bitcoin is a Pioneer Species by #[4] @#[4]
Another comprehensive article built around the analogy relating Bitcoin to a pioneer species in ecology. A different angle to approach the topic that I find quite compelling.
Next up are the podcast episodes, useful for people who prefer to listen to their content. Here are my favorite podcast episodes on Bitcoin's environmental impact 👇
1. Troy Cross on What Bitcoin Did - his appearances are must listen/watch for information about Bitcoin and the environment. Troy's thesis about Bitcoin and energy is well worth listening to!
He's been on the show 4 times, and all are great.
https://www.whatbitcoindid.com/troy-cross
2. Shaun Connell on What Bitcoin Did - Shaun appears once alone, and once with Troy Cross - his episodes include valuable information about how #bitcoin energy markets really work.
https://www.whatbitcoindid.com/podcast/bitcoin-energy-markets
3. Steve Barbour and Nate Harmon on What Bitcoin Did - The two have a spirited but healthy debate about climate change and Bitcoin's role in it. Good points from all sides and well worth listening to.
https://www.whatbitcoindid.com/podcast/a-climate-change-debate
4. Nate has a great episode on his own covering Bitcoin mining in the ocean using OTEC technology, highlighting an innovative use for Bitcoin mining to promote sustainable energy.
https://www.whatbitcoindid.com/podcast/bitcoin-unleashing-an-ocean-of-energy
5. Next, many great articles have been read by #[5] @#[5] on Bitcoin Audible including some already mentioned here, and further articles on the topic are also here.
You can find the articles from the podcast library and filtering for energy:
https://bitcoinaudible.com/library/
I couldn't find #[0]'s energy piece from the library, but here is the Apple Podcasts link:
Finally, I'll end with two upcoming book 📚 recommendations - I can't wait for both to be out, and I know that they both will make a great contribution to the Bitcoin environmental narrative, and addressing the environment specifically. 👇
1. The first book is The Progressive Case for Bitcoin by Jason Maier @#[6]
This book will cover common arguments against #Bitcoin by progressives, including the environmental angle.
You can hear more from Jason's appearance on What Bitcoin Did: https://www.whatbitcoindid.com/podcast/a-progressives-case-for-bitcoin
2. Finally, Abundance Through Scarcity by Ioni Appelberg
Ioni makes wonderful animated videos, many with #[5] and Knut Svanholm, and he will be coming out with this book soon.
He has discussed the upcoming book on the Freedom Footprint Show:
Bonus: Ioni, Guy, and Knut's video Orange is the New Green is a great video take on the topic!
That's a wrap! Thanks everyone who answered the original Note and Tweet! There were so many responses, I haven't included everything here, but you can find even more resources in those conversations.
@note1pwyy83ahnh2vkkct9g6yx65szu24zldhgr4l55jwegsrkp34whzs53j4ln
Thanks for reading, I hope this has been helpful!
First up: the articles. Articles are a great way to convey a specific piece of information while being both informative and including enough detail to get to the nuance. Here are many of the best articles I found on the topic:
1. #[0]'s @#[0] Bitcoin energy piece. This is a comprehensive overview of Bitcoin's energy usage, from Bitcoin's purpose to why proof of work is necessary. Well written and easy to read, this is one of the best articles on the topic.

Lyn Alden
Bitcoin's Energy Usage Isn't a Problem. Here's Why.
Updated for 2023, this report is a deep dive on Bitcoin's energy usage and long-term scaling approach, with data tables and case studies.
Bitcoin – Let’s start from SCRATCH – Batcoinz

Bitcoin Magazine
The Humanitarian And Environmental Case For Bitcoin
Bitcoin can reduce aid corruption, help end dependency and bootstrap renewable energy for emerging markets.
Strategy
Bitcoin Mining and the Environment
Bitcoin Mining and the Environment
Apple Podcasts
Read_550 - Bitcoin
Podcast Episode · Bitcoin Audible · 08/12/2021 · 2h 7m

X (formerly Twitter)
Luke de Wolf (@lukedewolf) on X
Twitter, I need your help! Best research about the environmental effects of Bitcoin mining please! I started the orange pill process of a good frie...
In the latest episode of the Freedom Footprint Show, Ben de Wall joined Knut Svanholm and BtcPseudoFinn for a thought-provoking, varied conversation. Originally from New Zealand, Ben comes from a software development and coding background. His range of interests and knowledge is impressive and his passion for Bitcoin is long-lasting. A perfect combo for our show!
In the episode, Ben and Knut go head to head as we explore the concepts of capitalism, the free market and we delve into the distinction between possession and ownership, the validity of contracts, and intellectual property. We also approach difficult concepts often used against libertarianism - national defense, immigration, and big governments - and we highlight interesting alternatives such as Rojava in Northeastern Syria and Christiania in Copenhagen.
The show is out now on Youtube and on all podcast platforms!
PV Nostriches, I need your help! Best research about the environmental effects of Bitcoin mining please! I started the orange pill process of a good friend, and he's hung up on the environmental part. I need reinforcements! What's the best we have these days?
On the latest episode of the Freedom Footprint Show, Angelo Morgan-Somers explores the idea: Fiat is like drugs.
Check out the full episode to see the whole interview:
In the latest episode of the Freedom Footprint Show, Pietro Battistella and Knut Svanholm discuss the importance of timing and the human factor in technological discoveries and Bitcoin. Drawing from his book “Bitcoin Technics and Time,” Battistella explains how technics are becoming increasingly autonomous, and how this force exists in every field of human knowledge, not just technology.
Technics can be defined as the undefined increase of the ability to achieve goals through the deployment of means in a way that is always more efficient, always faster, and generally better. The idea is that given the right economic, political, and especially technological conditions, technics and innovations will emerge spontaneously, to the point that the individual who discovers them becomes less like a fundamental factor and more like a catalyst in the process.
This is the concept of inevitability of discovery: if somebody doesn’t make a specific discovery, given the right conditions, someone else will eventually get to the same result in a process that is much more autonomous than we can think. Battistella argues that we can observe this through history, in how discoveries have often emerged at similar times in very different parts of the world.
Now, let’s connect this idea to Bitcoin and Satoshi. The underlying techniques and ideologies that drive Bitcoin - encryption, a distributed ledger, and the need for a decentralized currency with a fixed supply - already existed. Could we consider Satoshi just a catalyst then? He brought together the ideas into the Bitcoin we know today, but hadn’t he done that, someone else could have eventually created something very similar. Or could they?
It's clear how specific the circumstances surrounding the emergence of Bitcoin are and the particular role that Satoshi played. Had he disappeared one day later or not at all, what would have happened? Had the fixed supply or block size been different, would it be the same? We must also consider the role played by humans in shaping Bitcoin. As Knut points out, we can’t ignore that there is still a prominent human component in the process of becoming and adopting Bitcoin since the system is built on a consensus.
Given the uniqueness of the parameters that shaped Bitcoin into what we know today, can we know that it would have worked under different ones? What do you think? Would Bitcoin be what it is today without Satoshi’s intervention?
To listen to the full conversation with Pietro, check out the episode on the Konsensus Network channel.
PV Nostrland!
PV nostriches! Got after it this morning, bench press among other things, feeling good! Have a good day everyone!
I recently finished reading The White Pill by Michael Malice.
This was a wonderful read on some disturbing subject matter, with an optimistic turn at the end (the titular White Pill).
I highly recommend this book. Here are some of my thoughts👇
Although it gives some earlier context and touches on related events, the White Pill is the story of the Soviet Union from its creation until its dissolution. I had been interested in this topic before so I was familiar with some parts, but there were many new things for me.
The book begins with Ayn Rand explaining the difference between life in the Soviet Union and America. Starting the book here leads with a positive note - and the rest of the book is not so positive.
Next came the history of anarchism in the 19th and early 20th centuries, including Emma Goldman and Alexander Berkman. Their struggles against the state and on behalf of workers is presented compellingly. Both would eventually disavow the Soviet Union.
Another chapter in the Anarchy section was the sad story of Louis Lingg. Convicted without evidence of taking part in a bombing, he committed suicide before he could be executed. This episode especially stuck with me.
Regarding the Soviet Union, Michael Malice shows clearly how Lenin was a brutal dictator after taking control in Russia, causing mass deaths and killing indiscriminately to maintain power. History seems kinder to him than Stalin. It shouldn't be.
Then of course are many episodes involving Stalin's reign of terror. This section of the book was a real slog, reflecting the despairing circumstances that Soviet citizens lived under. Stalin's death released a palpable tension, probably as in real life.
I got the impression that this book included Gulag Archipelago Lite. That book has long been on my list to read, and surely goes into more detail than the White Pill. Nonetheless, the description of the gulag system highlighted how terrible the gulags really were.
The book turned to later events of the 20th Century, including the interplay between Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan. I learned a lot here, as I was less familiar with this era. They were both introduced as overturning stale political and economic systems.
Reagan's and Thatcher's main contribution was laying the groundwork to the opening up of the Soviet Union under Mikhail Gorbachev. As terrible Stalin's time, Gorbachev's felt optimistic. Through Perestroika and Glasnost, the fall of the Soviet Union felt inevitable.
As the book came to and end the histories of other Eastern Bloc countries were covered, including Poland, East Germany, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and Romania. Their stories were no less compelling than their Soviet counterparts.
Especially emphasized was the story of Romania under dictator Nicolae Ceaușescu. He and his wife Elena brutally exploited their country. They did not give up power easily unlike the rest of the region, and they ended up being executed.
The book ends as history, with the end of the Soviet Union and the rise of Russia and other sovereign countries in its stead. The final chapter is the thesis of the book, which I'll leave to the reader, but I was personally quite moved by.
The cover figures are Ayn Rand, Emma Goldman, Margaret Thatcher, and Elena Ceausescu. The first two, Malice clearly admires. I'm not quite so sure about Thatcher, but she's portrayed positively. Ceausescu is described as evil. Powerful contrast through influential women.
The book had a knack for making allegorical comparisons to modern politics, with allusions to Ukraine paralleling the current war, concerns about the age of a US president, plenty more I'm forgetting. And every time a law was mentioned, it seemed stupid.
Overall, this was a highly enjoyable read, despite its bleak subject matter. Michael Malice is a great writer, easy to follow and humorous while highlighting the dangers of centralized power. I recommend highly.
Have you read The White Pill? If so, what did you think of it?
This was a wonderful read on some disturbing subject matter, with an optimistic turn at the end (the titular White Pill).
I highly recommend this book. Here are some of my thoughts👇
Although it gives some earlier context and touches on related events, the White Pill is the story of the Soviet Union from its creation until its dissolution. I had been interested in this topic before so I was familiar with some parts, but there were many new things for me.
The book begins with Ayn Rand explaining the difference between life in the Soviet Union and America. Starting the book here leads with a positive note - and the rest of the book is not so positive.
Next came the history of anarchism in the 19th and early 20th centuries, including Emma Goldman and Alexander Berkman. Their struggles against the state and on behalf of workers is presented compellingly. Both would eventually disavow the Soviet Union.
Another chapter in the Anarchy section was the sad story of Louis Lingg. Convicted without evidence of taking part in a bombing, he committed suicide before he could be executed. This episode especially stuck with me.
Regarding the Soviet Union, Michael Malice shows clearly how Lenin was a brutal dictator after taking control in Russia, causing mass deaths and killing indiscriminately to maintain power. History seems kinder to him than Stalin. It shouldn't be.
Then of course are many episodes involving Stalin's reign of terror. This section of the book was a real slog, reflecting the despairing circumstances that Soviet citizens lived under. Stalin's death released a palpable tension, probably as in real life.
I got the impression that this book included Gulag Archipelago Lite. That book has long been on my list to read, and surely goes into more detail than the White Pill. Nonetheless, the description of the gulag system highlighted how terrible the gulags really were.
The book turned to later events of the 20th Century, including the interplay between Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan. I learned a lot here, as I was less familiar with this era. They were both introduced as overturning stale political and economic systems.
Reagan's and Thatcher's main contribution was laying the groundwork to the opening up of the Soviet Union under Mikhail Gorbachev. As terrible Stalin's time, Gorbachev's felt optimistic. Through Perestroika and Glasnost, the fall of the Soviet Union felt inevitable.
As the book came to and end the histories of other Eastern Bloc countries were covered, including Poland, East Germany, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and Romania. Their stories were no less compelling than their Soviet counterparts.
Especially emphasized was the story of Romania under dictator Nicolae Ceaușescu. He and his wife Elena brutally exploited their country. They did not give up power easily unlike the rest of the region, and they ended up being executed.
The book ends as history, with the end of the Soviet Union and the rise of Russia and other sovereign countries in its stead. The final chapter is the thesis of the book, which I'll leave to the reader, but I was personally quite moved by.
The cover figures are Ayn Rand, Emma Goldman, Margaret Thatcher, and Elena Ceausescu. The first two, Malice clearly admires. I'm not quite so sure about Thatcher, but she's portrayed positively. Ceausescu is described as evil. Powerful contrast through influential women.
The book had a knack for making allegorical comparisons to modern politics, with allusions to Ukraine paralleling the current war, concerns about the age of a US president, plenty more I'm forgetting. And every time a law was mentioned, it seemed stupid.
Overall, this was a highly enjoyable read, despite its bleak subject matter. Michael Malice is a great writer, easy to follow and humorous while highlighting the dangers of centralized power. I recommend highly.
Have you read The White Pill? If so, what did you think of it?PV Nostr, getting after it today!
I'm really going to try to get more active here. I've never been good at Twitter. I'm not that great at spending time here either. I have a bit of an aversion to sharing my thoughts publicly.
But Bitcoiners are my people and I want to join in all the fun everyone is having!
Any tips for getting less uncomfortable with sharing and discussing things on social media generally?
Check out the latest Freedom Footprint Show if you haven't already, with Wasabi Wallet contributor BTCparadigm - out now on all podcast platforms, and on YouTube 👇
The conversation is all about Bitcoin privacy, then turns into a philosophical discussion about religion, free will, objective truth, and a lot more. Let me know what you think!
I ventured into normieland a little more than usual last night, and I was more open about my Bitcoin tenancies than I usually am. No major pushback which was nice. Multiple comments about interest in Web3 and Crypto. One guy said "Solana is just better". I just laughed it off, it wasn't the venue for a big argument.
I'm going to have to get better at engaging with those sorts of views. We have so much work to do to get the word out. I'm here for it.
GM/PV