User's avatar
npub1f3jg...63xj
npub1f3jg...63xj
Also on fediverse: https://social.fbxl.net/@Hyolobrika Contact: xmpp:hyol@pisscord.whinge.town?omemo-sid-1992355796=a0fde853397e9cc2bd9ce76894fa3061d4d55e92cca6b060826639ce2e553d2c Matrix: @hyolobrika:chat.zxcvbn.space and :envs.net on SimpleX if you ask
I don't mind upvotes and downvotes when they don't changes visibility
Thinking about multisigs and social recovery wallets. Is it possible to have a more complex multisig where m of (n-1) can access the funds (I.e. in case the owner loses their key), but the nth key belongs to the owner (the master key) and can access the funds without anyone's permission? Is it possible to generalise that further and assign weights to keys? I.e. the master key would have full weight to reproduce the above behaviour and other keys would have lower weights depending on how much the owner trusts the keyholder.
This is such a cool channel. Primitive Technology: Iron Bacteria Cement (no fire/water insoluble)
You know what also bothers me about Nostr apart from NIP-05? The URLs. They're not structured like a normal URL should be apart from the 'nostr:' scheme. They just shove the 'note'/'npub'/whatever in front of the ID/key/whatever. Annoying. I would prefer they used, I.e, slashes.