It’s amazing watching those who called us racist for saying #Haiti is a shlthole country now tell us we can’t send Haitians back there because it’s a shlthole. Haitians can go back because Haiti is #great. #Celebrities said it years ago.

The longer you believe in “viruses”, the longer you give the government power to mandate vaccines on you and your children. You must learn now how “viruses” have never been proven to exist.

If you are in Bitcoin to get rich these dips are painful, if you are in Bitcoin for the revolution these dips are an opportunity.

#Liberals: “why are Republicans overreacting about Islam? They’re so out of touch.” Kick out #Islam they're trying to destroy the very fabric of the #USA 🇺🇸

Immigration is more dangerous to the West than a nuclear bomb. Think about it.

Are you sitting down? Percentage of births to foreign born mothers in Western Countries: 1980: 7% 1990: 11% 2000: 16% 2010: 21% 2020: 29% 2025: 32% This is all be design. Immigration from the 3rd world used as a weapon to destroy the Western Civilization. Sick.

Correlate this to what #Trump has been saying and everything comes into view... #JFK #USA 🇺🇸 fight communism

I wish kids today knew how hard this intro goes.... #Batman 🦇

‘GO BACK TO F**KING HAITI!’ Megyn Kelly Tells Haitians Losing Temporary Protective Status Following Supreme Court Ruling

From Goldman's Delta-1 Desk: Hyperscalers: This is poised to become one of the defining debates of the next few months. Markets have rarely rewarded companies allocating exceptionally large proportions of free cash flow toward capex during the build phase. This does not necessarily mean management is making poor long-term decisions; it simply means equity investors generally prefer immediate, tangible returns to distant, uncertain cash flows. Multiple expansion typically occurs during the harvesting phase, not the construction phase. The theory of reflexivity remains highly relevant in this environment. If hyperscalers continue to underperform while suppliers rally, boardrooms may increasingly question whether incremental AI investment is maximizing shareholder value. At some point, capital expenditure may slow and if one peer blinks, the market will immediately question whether others should follow.

Good morning fellow patriots! Rise and shine. Pour some coffee.☕️☕️☕️ Let’s go!🚀🔥

From Goldman's Delta-1 Desk: Open-Weight: I still don’t think markets appreciate what GLM-5.2 and the advent of near frontier quality open weight models actually change. One explanation for the recent weakness in hyperscalers is precisely that…open models reduce the need to centralize every incremental workload inside closed cloud/frontier ecosystems. If more inference gradually migrates on premise or to enterprise owned infrastructure, the required pace of hyperscale investment inevitably comes into question (arguably its been bullish for hardware). Curious if we see more anecdotes of enterprises routing simple inference to local or open models while escalating only the hardest reasoning tasks to frontier APIs. That efficiency layer has barely been monetized. Cost conscious enterprises are no longer willing to subsidize unlimited token consumption when capable alternatives exist. One question I’ve been asking myself is whether governments eventually regulate frontier open-weight models in the same way they regulate other dual-use technologies. Not necessarily an outright ban, but licensing, safety certification or restrictions on models above defined capability thresholds, particularly from foreign developers. Ironically, that would probably strengthen the major cloud providers, who become the trusted distribution channel for approved models. First order, that’s probably supportive for hyperscalers and perhaps slightly less so for decentralized hardware demand. The second order effects become much more complicated. Restricting open models risks slowing domestic innovation while encouraging the rest of the world to continue developing independently. Remove open source entirely and you also remove a major source of competition, effectively concentrating intelligence inside a small number of closed providers.

The No Kings crowd sure are quiet about the Communist Dictator in New York City. Weird?!

Saylor's only strategy is BTC going up, if it doesn't he's fucked, his entire strategy is Hope. And he's pinning us down with his uncertainty. So unless a exogenous force comes along pushing BTC up, we'll remain in purgatory.

71% of all approved H-1B visas go to workers born in a single country. Out of 399,395 approved petitions, 283,397 went to workers born in India. China is a distant second at 11.7%. The Philippines barely registers at 1.3%. Every other nation on Earth combined fills just 16% of the slots. This isn't what a "global talent pipeline" looks like. This is what a labor arbitrage scheme looks like when you dress it up in immigration policy language. Large consulting and outsourcing firms file thousands of petitions at a time, cycling through workers paid at or near the program's wage floors while American workers in the same roles are passed over or replaced entirely. The H-1B was sold to the public as a way to recruit the best and brightest from around the world. In practice, it operates as a bilateral labor export agreement disguised as a universal one. The structural flaw is obvious: unlike green cards, there are no meaningful per-country caps on H-1B approvals. So when one country's outsourcing industry builds an entire business model around gaming the system, nothing stops it from swallowing the program whole. If policymakers were serious about reform, they'd start with a simple question: how did a visa designed for global talent end up as a jobs pipeline for one country's IT services industry?

"Tonight, as we stand on the edge of our 250th year of independence, I am thrilled to declare that AMERICA IS BACK... This is our heritage, this is our history, & this is the destiny of America: to be the greatest, most incredible country to ever grace the Earth." - POTUS

The extraordinary charm of #Paris 100 years ago 🇫🇷✨ Paris in 1926 was at the height of the Années folles (“The Crazy Years”), a period of extraordinary cultural, artistic, and social vitality that followed the First World War It was a city defined by the Jazz Age, with nightclubs, cabarets, American orchestras, and an unrivaled nightlife Art Deco dominated architecture, interior design, fashion, and the decorative arts, while Paris established itself as the artistic capital of the world Painters, writers, and musicians from across the globe moved there, including Ernest Hemingway, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Pablo Picasso, and Josephine Baker Fashion was also undergoing a revolution Maisons such as Chanel redefined women’s style with clean, elegant lines Neighborhoods like Montparnasse and Montmartre became the heart of the city’s intellectual life, where literary cafés buzzed with artists, writers, and thinkers From a historical perspective, in 1926 France was under the Third French Republic, a democratic period that was nevertheless marked by growing economic and political tensions, which would intensify toward the end of the decade In short, Paris in 1926 is often regarded as one of the most fascinating periods in the city’s history: elegant, cosmopolitan, creative, and filled with optimism, just before the Great Depression of 1929, which would profoundly change the world

The Bilderberg group founding paper ‘Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars’ in 1954 states:- We will keep the State education system so poor that even the brightest amongst them will never understand our plans. ‘Modern’ education teaches pupils what to think, not how to think.

I'll start destroying the #USA 🇺🇸