Melvin C. McDowell's avatar
Melvin C. McDowell
melmc@iris.to
npub1gcz4...93hh
I am a Christian and a retired attorney (I am no longer licensed to practice law in any jurisdiction ), former IRS revenue officer, and former naval intelligence officer. I am also a Son of the American Revolution and a Gideon. I oppose racism and antisemitism (please keep such stuff off my timeline). You can follow me on Mastodon at melmc@freeatlantis.com. #DeSantis2028 Make America Florida - Quiero practicar español - SOLI DEO GLORIA
Melvin C. McDowell's avatar
melmc 2 years ago
image Make America Florida #DeSantis2024
Melvin C. McDowell's avatar
melmc 2 years ago
Don’t believe the lies Trump tells about DeSantis, trying to link him to Paul Ryan: Paul Ryan calls DeSantis-pushed 'anti-woke' issues 'polarizing': 'I'm not a culture war guy' Former U.S. House Speaker Paul Ryan pushed back on "culture war" issues described as being "anti-woke" during an appearance on CBS.
Melvin C. McDowell's avatar
melmc 2 years ago
Make America Florida #DeSantis2024 image
Melvin C. McDowell's avatar
melmc 2 years ago
Make America Florida #DeSantis2024 image
Melvin C. McDowell's avatar
melmc 2 years ago
Stephen Carter - How Trump's indictment compares to other espionage act cases “We should be clear, moreover, that the question of whether Trump is being treated differently is an argument only about the 31 counts of the indictment that charge the former president with willfully retaining sensitive documents in violation of Title 18, section 793(e), of the United States Code — a part of the Espionage Act. The six other counts involve obstruction of justice and false statements to investigators, for better or worse the common currency of white-collar prosecution. If he lied, he's stuck.”
Melvin C. McDowell's avatar
melmc 2 years ago
Make America Florida #DeSantis2024 image
Melvin C. McDowell's avatar
melmc 2 years ago
Your logic lesson for today: The genetic fallacy is the act of rejecting or accepting an argument on the basis of its origin rather than its content. Under the genetic fallacy, we judge a claim by paying too much attention to its source or history, even though this criticism is irrelevant to the truth of the claim. If you understand the genetic fallacy you should realize that calling the originator of the argument a name is insufficient to refute the argument.