i was gonna ask "who should i follow"
but then people are gonna suggest people i dont wanna follow and since im not gonna follow them. its gonna get weird, and they might feel bad.
so im just gonna say GM instead.
GM
nomadshiba⚡
nomadshiba@npub.name
npub1gkp4...ppqk
- knotzi ₿
- bip110
- 300KB blocks
- #ArchiveCore
i make stuff (rabbit hole for other links)
https://github.com/DeepDoge
get your npub name
https://npub.name
bip352 / silent payments: sp1qqwdknqgz7v2ph8hxjc9t2nz3frqazjkhu7c5ar5w03tn0amw3ugrsq5zmaznxjuce70l6p47t5vm25qngxnwqgk025csgr735uds0y9wsgjkuhfc
GM
im gonna sleep GN
that's why people think ai produces good code.
look i use ai at work time to time, the most expensive models. but i can still recognize that its shit.
me: do [insert thing to do here in detail]
ai: ok so im gonna do this this way and change these places, [insert exactly i want].
ai changing the code: *year forget about all im just gonna do something else or do some extra shit you didn't ask for*
View quoted note →
shit code everywhere with every product so normalized.
people can't recognize garbage code and behavior when they see it.
core is not gonna recover. we need alternatives from scratch
@BitBetBot didn't even look at the price or chart, just gonna randomly say: down
sometimes we use llms at work, when there is a deadline.
its just garbage code.
none of the ai generated code stays in the codebase.
its just waste of time.
FOMO garbage.
more ai generated garbage you have, ai becomes even more worse, even with the most expensive models...
then you have a garbage codebase you cant even work on manually. and have to rewrite everything...
1000 line files, so much shit code even the tooling fails at some point. like you hit OS watch file limits in dev mode.
then you have to get in there and remove everything one by one. and rewrite them...
"last time you used llm, you made it fast":
yeah last time codebase was understandable, so ai was able to duck tape in some stuff. or last time we just made a small interface, we weren't working on this big project...
"just create bad code we have to publish on this date. just make sure there are no bugs"
in what world "bad code" means "faster"? there is no such correlation...
yes llms are useful like if you change something and wanna refactor the codebase to use the new method. and some other stuff... doesnt mean we can use it everywhere...
its just garbage... i hate it...
it just creates the illusion of "fast", but then later down the line you spend even more time fixing and debugging things.
im so tired...
Remember, limitation makes creativity.
local llms are the future
"Oh, they've got the technically sound arguments."
They don't ever make any technical arguments because their technical argument is:
*"If you make the data carrier size bigger, there'll be more OP_RETURNs of a size bigger than the limit used to be."*
Like, okay. That's the extent of the technical discussion. It's not a technical debate, guys. We know it. We know it. And I've said it a million times before.
— Bitcoin Mechanic
The distinction between theory and practical decentralization:
many people can call things "decentralized"
but decentralization also requires a system that makes decentralization easier.
email is "decentralized" in theory, but its really not in practice:
- you have to run a server, or rent a server.
- you have to keep the server running.
- you can't switch back and forth between servers/providers without changing your identity.
- you are stuck on your provider.
so this means something decentralized should let you:
- switch between instances without changing your identity.
- should allow you to change providers.
- should allow you to start self hosting anytime without any downsides or effort.
- you shouldn't have to keep a server running 24/7, you should be able to go offline. so you shouldn't need a traditional server. you phone, your pc should be able to be the self hosted provider, that doesnt need 100% uptime.
- it should be easy to participate in the network.
so what is not decentralized in practice?
- matrix
- fediverse (mastadon)
- email
- ethereum
what is decentralized?
- nostr
why?
in nostr your relays are not namespaces for users. users have key pairs, so they can easily change between relays without changing their identity.
a relay is just server that lets you store and query nostr events. and many nostr clients designed to work with many relays, discover relays, and broadcast smartly, so you can use multiple relays at once, you can decide to self host your events at any point.
if you are self hosting, you profile doesnt go down just because your self hosted relay went down. so you can run a relay on your phone using apps like Citrine, and using Orbot you can host it over tor onion addresses for free, from any network. (this can also be built-in in nostr apps in the future)
You can start using Nostr with Primal, and some default public relays. But then you can self-host or change your relay list anytime later. You can backup your events, or events mentioning you, and rebroadcast them if they go missing.
All without being have to start over.
If you have a Gmail, you can't switch to ProtonMail simply. Your address changes, your inbox changes, etc.
You can't switch Matrix instances as well.
You can't switch Fediverse providers without changing everything.
You can't simply start self hosting.
On nostr, you can. It's truly decentralized.
i got the domain:
zapwork.app
if anyone wants it, let me know.
so many so called bitcoiners shaken out this cycle.
just stack sats
and focus on your craft View quoted note →
male astrology
vs bitcoin maxi
pick your side.
got an sd card, so i can run a full node on my phone instead of running a pruned one
core is the gold standard
knots is the bitcoin standard View quoted note →
gotta update my node on my phone. View quoted note →