we need many implementations with different tyrants. so we have decentralized options. not democracy. View quoted note →
nomadshiba⚡
nomadshiba@npub.name
npub1gkp4...ppqk
- knotzi ₿
- bip110
- 300KB blocks
- #ArchiveCore
i make stuff (rabbit hole for other links)
https://github.com/DeepDoge
get your npub name
https://npub.name
bip352 / silent payments: sp1qqwdknqgz7v2ph8hxjc9t2nz3frqazjkhu7c5ar5w03tn0amw3ugrsq5zmaznxjuce70l6p47t5vm25qngxnwqgk025csgr735uds0y9wsgjkuhfc
the weird part about the core repo is, you get more say in changes to bitcoin when you make more changes.
so if you are conservative and careful, you dont have any say, because you are fine with bitcoin as is.
it's a parliament, not decentralized.
run knots.
make more implementations.
you grow up when you realize devs working at many big projects are shit.
yt, x, google, twitch, reddit, bitcoin
not all tho, that would be unfair.
the difference between Kiki and coretards is, coretards think they are geniuses:

when i first came to nostr i was only posting about bitcoin vs crypto.
what makes bitcoin bitcoin. why its limitations are intentional features.
how bitcoin maximizes decentralization, and sacrifices everything else for it. how perfect its.
i had loong loong posts about it.
then core did the shit, and ruined it. now all i post about is core and knots...
anyone who supports calle coretard, is not worth anything.
X "For You" tab is filled with low iq coretard circle jerk


GN knotstr

go read this to see the dumbest core dev arguments ever against a fix:
these people are the core devs in 2024-2025. its not a parody or a joke. its the reality.
this people will sacrifice everything bitcoin for more "features".
GitHub
Policy: Enforce witness script size limit for tapscript by luke-jr · Pull Request #29769 · bitcoin/bitcoin
Tapscript is missing the policy size limit check. The limit is inconsistent between witness and scriptSig, so for now this uses the (higher) witnes...
i was holding myself to not mute odel.
but now he has gone full coretard (retard core supporter).
trying to hit at Luke with one liners.
but never ever hit at a shady shit core did.
there are a lot of things to call "fucked up".
he decides to call a fact "fucked up".
you know what is fucked up?
the fact that we are actually here rn,
because core couldn't stop removing policies from their client. because of their ego and superiority complex they formed in their little minds. you can't change a retard's mind with a thousand facts
their addiction to add "features" to bitcoin that has nothing to do with bitcoin.
coretard devs don't have principles for protecting bitcoin and keeping it decentralized money. they dont have a hard limit that stops them from adding "features". if the "feature" is cool enough they have to bend everything and add it. such a childish retarded behavior.
bitcoin is for bitcoin only. nothing else.
bitcoin is bitcoin. View quoted note →
another great @Joe Nakamoto video:
i question why coretards wants to push us to a softfork.
they remove policy and cause inscriptions.
then they remove even more policy and allow bigger OP_RETURNs.
then say that we need a soft fork now, because policy dont work when its removed.
yes our options are getting less and less because of the mess core created. and we might need soft fork.
but why force us to this path in the first place?
GM

make a better bitcoin full client, that's easy tko run and use. View quoted note →
there are millions of bitcoiners but almost all don't run their own knots.
save bitcoin.
