the following is a really bad argument for whole-heartedly recommending Strategy preferred stocks to retirees, don't do this: boomers are already invested in US treasury products the US has already invaded countries with bitcoin reserves Bitcoin is a US strategic interest If Strategy had a security risk with bitcoin, etc, it would be a US priority. It's basically backstopped by the US gov at this point. Boomers retirements and savings are already in the hands of the US, why not take the rocket-powered version?

"[College] That is a six-figure subscription to information that is free nowadays delivered at a snail's pace." "The junior job was never really about the work. You see, nobody actually hires a first year analyst because the spreadsheets were any good. They hired you as an apprenticeship in disguise. The ground work was your tuition, and that's where you learn the stuff that no other course teaches. Reading a room, managing a boss, figuring out what *done* actually means when there's money and egos on the line. Every law firm, consultancy, and tech giant ran the same scheme. Throw cheap, smart people at boring problems until judgment emerges." "Companies adopting AI cut the junior hiring by 13%. They're not firing the experienced people. They're just never replacing that pipeline, which means in about 10 years there may be a senior talent famine."

Would Starlink and self-driving Tesla have happened anyway? After listening to Ryan Hogue and his specific Bitcoin and Strategy stock chart analysis, it sounds like we are just stuck on an exponential growth chart. Like, it doesn't actually matter who is CEO of Tesla or Strategy, or who is president and how many subsidies are given out. So if the world doesn't end, we are all just stuck on an exponential chart of progress. if AI doesn't come this year, it will come next year. If we didn't solve self-driving cars in the last 20, it will be solved by AI in the next 2 years. View quoted note →