🗣 Musk’s wealth tops half a trillion dollars Forbes reports Elon Musk is now worth more than $500 billion. If the current trajectory continues, he could become the first trillionaire in history within the next decade. Or he could just buy $100 billion worth of BTC and wait a 4-year cycle 🤔

Bitcoin …. Our saviour 🤗

Life as a shitcoiner 🤣🤣

Now thats one helluven idea 😉

Interesting gold - bitcoin discussion

We are entering the ZONE

Countries Contemplating a Bitcoin Strategic Reserve As of October 2, 2025, “contemplating” refers to countries actively discussing, proposing legislation, or exploring policies to establish a Bitcoin (BTC) strategic reserve—without yet implementing a formalized program. This excludes nations with established reserves (El Salvador, United States, Bhutan). Discussions often focus on BTC’s role in hedging inflation, diversifying assets, or enhancing sovereignty, inspired by U.S. and El Salvador models. Based on recent reports and announcements, here’s a list of key countries, grouped by region for clarity: Europe • Czech Republic
The Czech National Bank (CNB) announced in January 2025 it is considering allocating up to 5% of its €140 billion reserves (~$146 billion) to BTC as part of foreign exchange diversification. Governor Aleš Michl emphasized a small initial portion, pending unanimous board approval. • Russia
In December 2024, state media reported an official proposal for a national BTC reserve following President Putin’s praise of BTC as an alternative to foreign currencies. Discussions continue amid sanctions, with no acquisition plans yet but strong governmental interest. • Switzerland
The Swiss National Bank (SNB) is contemplating adding BTC to reserves alongside gold, per ongoing discussions in 2025. However, a formal proposal was rejected in early 2025 due to volatility concerns, though advocacy persists. • Poland
Presidential candidate Sławomir Mentzen proposed a strategic BTC reserve in his May 2025 campaign platform to position Poland as a crypto hub with low taxes and supportive regulations. No national policy yet, but it has sparked parliamentary debate. • Germany
Former Finance Minister Christian Lindner urged the ECB and Bundesbank in early 2025 to consider BTC reserves, citing U.S. models. Discussions are exploratory, focusing on Europe’s lag in digital assets. • Netherlands
Parliament is officially considering a strategic BTC reserve as of September 2025, proposed by MP Thierry Baudet. This reflects growing “nation-state FOMO” in Europe, with debates on geopolitical leverage. Americas (Outside U.S./El Salvador) • Brazil
The Sovereign Strategic Bitcoin Reserve (RESBit) bill, proposed in November 2024, cleared its first committee in June 2025. It aims to allocate 5% of international reserves to BTC, managed by the Central Bank to back the Drex CBDC and hedge risks. Asia-Pacific • Japan
Japan is “circling the idea” of a BTC reserve in 2025, per industry reports, as part of broader digital asset diversification. No formal bill, but government officials have signaled interest amid rising BTC prices. • Hong Kong
A lawmaker proposed in early 2025 incorporating BTC into fiscal reserves via the Exchange Fund for long-term holding. This aligns with Hong Kong’s progressive crypto regulations, though it’s still in exploratory stages. • Philippines
A bill introduced in August 2025 proposes acquiring 10,000 BTC over five years for a strategic reserve with a 20-year lockup. This aims to boost financial stability, with ongoing legislative review. • Papua New Guinea
The government is exploring a strategic BTC reserve as of August 2025, driven by mining potential and economic diversification needs in the Pacific region. Other Regions • Venezuela
Amid economic challenges, Venezuela is considering BTC to reduce U.S. dollar dependence. Proposals date to 2025 discussions, but hyperinflation and sanctions complicate progress. These 12 countries represent the most prominent ongoing contemplations, with momentum accelerating post-U.S. reserve establishment in March 2025. Many proposals face hurdles like volatility concerns and regulatory alignment (e.g., IMF criteria). Additional nations (e.g., sub-national U.S. states like Arizona and Utah) are pursuing similar ideas but are excluded here as they aren’t sovereign countries. Global adoption could surge if early movers succeed, per Fidelity’s 2025 predictions.

Vanguard close to doing a backflip on their decision not to offer BTC ETF’s to their clients.. Bitcoin 🤗 absorbing one global behemoth at a time .. is Microsoft / Apple / Facebook next behemoth to adopt BTC functionality in to their ecosystems . 🤔. Users move to emerging technologies, & BTC is as emerging as it gets..

🟠 Telegram CEO says he thinks Bitcoin will go to $1,000,000+ 👀 "The governments keeps printing money like no tomorrow. Nobody is printing bitcoin." 🚀

Jason Lowery post describing future uses of BitPower “ In our three-dimensional world, we secure our assets by imposing physical costs on potential threats. For example, we protect gold with massive vault doors that intruders must physically break through. We secure national borders with military defenses that adversaries must physically overcome. Armies secure land by imposing physical costs (measured in watts) on adversaries operating in, from, and through land. Navies secure the sea by imposing physical costs (measured in watts) on adversaries operating in, from, and through the sea. Air Forces secure air space by imposing physical costs (measured in watts) on adversaries operating in, from, and through air space. Space Forces secure outer space by imposing physical costs (measured in watts) on adversaries operating in, from, and through outer space. Cyber Forces secure cyber space by... encoding logic that adversaries can easily hack/exploit. This reveals a major flaw: we’ve been using the wrong approach to secure cyberspace. Unlike the way we secure land, sea, air, and space, the way we secure cyberspace relies solely on encoded logic (software), not on imposing physical costs, for security. To secure information/assets in cyberspace in a way that is consistent with other domains, the world needs to adopt a universal protocol that imposes a tangible physical cost on adversaries. This can be achieved by developing a protocol that digitizes the cost of physical power expenditure (measured in watts) and imposes those costs on cyber threats. Enter reusable Proof-of-Work (PoW) protocols. Proof-of-Work (PoW) secures software by requiring a self-imposed, extra energy expenditure. By creating a protocol where a certain amount of energy (watts) must be expended to execute commands, access networks, or transmit data, we establish a system that imposes a physical cost on adversaries attempting to disrupt or exploit cyberspace. This aligns our approach to cyber security to the approach we use to secure assets and access to all four other domains. To that end, Bitcoin isn't a "coin" at all. It's Bitpower - the digital projection of physical power into cyberspace. We can use this network to PHYSICALLY secure information rather than LOGICALLY secure information. We're already using it to secure information we voluntarily choose to call financial information, hence why we call it a "coin." In the future, people will use this "Bitpower protocol" as a self-imposed physical constraint for transferring info, sending command signals, accessing networks, etc etc. This will dramatically reduce the attack surface and impose physical costs on malicious actors. It will also make "Bitpower" tokens extremely valuable, for reasons that transcend its current use as "digital gold."