yo yo nostriches!!! Is there anyone out there who cares enough about NIP-98 for a chat? I'm using it for api access. The client signs an event (which is never published but sent in the Auth header as per the NIP). The server validates the event and then returns the records associated with the signer. The issue is when my nip07signer (Flamingo) prompts me to sign the request, it is blank. This is because the content field SHOULD be blank according to the NIP. The thing I want to do is change the NIP to MUST have content which contains the METHOD and URL strings to be valid. This would mean that the user sees what they are signing and validation can do a simple string search of the content field based on the url and method tags. Anyone got any ideas on this? Also, if you know of anyone other than (the likely far to busy for banter about draft|optional NIPs) @fiatjaf, with the time and knowledge to give feedback on this idea, please tag them in for me :)

469 days uptime... thank you @k3tan for the tyuts on building a node :)

I think this is what they mean by bluebird :) #letsgo

@ODELL did you ever reconnect with Lionel Shriver? it would be fun to hear if your rip and subsequent satstorm sent her off on a journey...

yo CAPS @ODELL!!! listened to the last @Citadel Dispatch rip on @Fountain and am now giving @primal a whirl!!! So far the UX is good enough to believe that UX is the guiding star!! :) Thx @miljan!! I'm gonna try to spin up an indexer/cache too

Kind 1 😤

peowpeow!!!!

One foot after the other

Step by step

Now running as a daemon :)

After long enough sniffing about nostr, ‘24 seemed like the year to run a node and twiddle all the knobs. I wonder what I will learn on this adventure.

Pingin Ma relay

Sunny start to ‘24!!!

Happy new year y’all!!! Hope Your hats are tied on tight… you’re gonna want to have your hands free for 2024!!!!

OMG!!! Someone zapped me!!! I am now confident that I have worth and value to add to the world!!! #feelingspecial