This image is asking a single question that most political arguments dodge.
Who has to explain themselves.
On the left, freedom is the standard. That means peaceful action is presumed allowed. If someone wants to use force against you, they carry the burden. They have to justify why force is necessary, why it is proportionate, and why you specifically are the person it may be used on. This is the logic behind ideas like due process, presumption of innocence, and the general moral intuition most people already hold in daily life. If I want to stop you from walking, trading, building, speaking, or moving your own property, I owe you an explanation. I do not get to demand paperwork from you just because I exist.
On the right, liberty is the standard in the way modern states often use the word. Liberty becomes a corridor of approved behavior. The default flips. Individuals must justify their behavior to authorities. Your peaceful action is not treated as normal. It is treated as suspect until you can produce the right permission. That is what the checkpoint, cameras, and “ID scan” symbolize. The police are not responding to a proven victim or a specific crime. They are managing compliance. That is why the people are holding signs that say permit, license, approval. The point is not that every rule is evil. The point is the structure. The structure says you must prove you are allowed before you are left alone.
Historically, you can see both standards in action.
When communities rely more on custom, reputation, restitution, and decentralized dispute resolution, the burden tends to sit on the person initiating force. Many merchant communities operated with private arbitration and reputation systems because trade dies if every transaction requires prior approval. Various legal traditions also emphasized restitution to victims rather than punishment for violating abstract rules. The core idea is simple. If there is a victim, you can identify the harmed party, the harm, and the remedy. If there is no victim, force becomes much harder to justify.
Modern centralized systems trend the other direction because they scale through categories and permissions. It is easier for a bureaucracy to police activities by requiring licenses, registrations, and inspections than it is to evaluate each case as a unique human dispute. So the permission architecture grows. Occupational licensing expands. Zoning expands. Business compliance expands. Surveillance expands. You get a world where it is normal to be asked for papers even when no one has accused you of harming anyone.
The psychological shift is the real point of the image.
In a freedom standard world, the default question is, who has the moral right to use force here. In a liberty standard world, the default question becomes, am I allowed. People internalize caution. They avoid experimentation. They ask permission first. They self censor. They stop acting like owners of their lives and start acting like applicants.
So the image is not claiming paradise on the left and hell on the right. It is identifying the direction of the burden of proof.
When freedom is the standard, power must explain itself.
When liberty as permission is the standard, you must explain yourself.
Source:
Facebook
Log into Facebook
Log into Facebook to start sharing and connecting with your friends, family, and people you know.
Em agosto de 2019, uma decisão do ministro Alexandre de Moraes suspendeu investigações da Receita Federal relacionadas a um procedimento interno que reuniu dados fiscais de 133 contribuintes. Entre os nomes alcançados pela apuração estavam integrantes do Supremo Tribunal Federal, incluindo a esposa do então presidente da Corte, Dias Toffoli, e o ministro Gilmar Mendes. No mesmo despacho, Moraes determinou o afastamento de servidores da Receita envolvidos no caso, sob o argumento de que teriam ocorrido ilegalidades na condução das apurações.
➡ Confira a matéria na íntegra acessando o link no Story
acesse:
www.FolhadoEstado.com.br
#FolhadoEstado #JornalFolhadoEstado #FolhadoEstadoOficial #cuiaba #mt
Source: https://web.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=122290168766019639
André René Roussimoff (André the Giant) at 18, towering over a group of women, Paris, 1966. André had gigantism & grew to 7'4" tall. He became a famous wrestler & starred in classic Rob Reiner film, The Princess Bride.
Source: 
True story.
Source: 
Today it was 82°F in Texas.
Soon it'll be 29°F. 😑
Source: 
Zarina Stahnke
The Ballerina Project
Source: 
Crucifixo histórico no supremo não pode, mas gastar milhões pra charlatões "mudarem o clima", aí tá de boa!
Source: 
Source: 
Part of our 𝐇𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝐒𝐚𝐥𝐞 are 𝐁𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐚 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐣𝐞𝐜𝐭 large format limited edition prints. These timeless prints come alive with a substantial 18x27 inch image size on a 20x30 inch sheet. With digital platforms dominating our lives today experience the Ballerina Project in its true analog form. Each print is a rare find and will not be restocked once they are sold. 
🎯
Source: 
Well it's not wrong...
Source: 
Source: 
The European Union is now openly advocating for censorship, with officials stating the need to build “societal immunity”, described as a kind of vaccine, against what they label as information manipulation.
The language has raised concern among critics who see parallels between public health-style messaging and tighter control over speech and narratives. Coming at a time when the EU is heavily involved in the Ukraine conflict, these statements are being viewed by some as part of a broader push to manage public opinion during periods of political and military tension.
As debates over war, conscription, and free expression continue across Europe, critics warn that limiting dissenting voices may be used to manufacture consent, even when public appetite for conflict is low.
#EuropeanUnion #FreeSpeech #CensorshipDebate #InformationControl #UkraineWar #CivilLiberties #Geopolitics #ViralVibes
Source: