Girino Vey!'s avatar
Girino Vey!
girino@girino.org
npub18lav...cfsz
Bitcoin holder since 2013, software developer and political nihilist.
Girino Vey!'s avatar
Girino Vey! 1 month ago
🎬 Falando de Aljubarrota — Episódio 6 | A Batalha Real | Parte I Neste episódio, recuamos no tempo para perceber os acontecimentos que levaram à Batalha Real. Aqui, percebemos que antes da Batalha, houve estratégia. 👉🏻 No próximo, revelamos o motivo da escolha do lendário planalto de S. Jorge. #BatalhadeAljubarrota #História #visiteportugal 🎬 Falando de Aljubarrota — Episódio 6 | A Batalha Real | Parte II Tudo pronto no planalto de S. Jorge. A batalha está prestes a começar. ⚔️ 👉🏻 O desfecho? No próximo episódio. #BatalhadeAljubarrota #História #visiteportugal 🎬 Falando de Aljubarrota — Episódio 6 | A Batalha Real | Parte III Um dia, uma batalha, uma vitória que mudou Portugal. #BatalhadeAljubarrota #História #visiteportugal Source:
Girino Vey!'s avatar
Girino Vey! 1 month ago
Girino Vey!'s avatar
Girino Vey! 1 month ago
image In 1987, Sowell published A Conflict of Visions, and it explained something everyone experiences but nobody can articulate: why political arguments feel like talking to aliens. The book isn't about left versus right. It's about something deeper. Two different ways of seeing what humans are capable of, what knowledge actually is, and how society should be organized. The core friction point that makes campus debates impossible: One vision sees social problems as emerging from basic human constraints. Scarcity is real. People are naturally selfish. Knowledge is limited and dispersed. We can't change these facts, only build institutions that work with them. The other vision sees problems as failures of will or wisdom. With the right leaders, the right education, the right system, we could solve these problems. Human nature isn't fixed. It's waiting to be improved. Sowell calls these the \"constrained\" and \"unconstrained\" visions of human nature. The constrained vision accepts that humans are flawed, selfish, and limited in knowledge and virtue. We can't perfect people. We can only design systems that channel self-interest toward social benefit. This is Adam Smith watching the butcher, the brewer, and the baker. This is Burke warning against tearing down institutions we don't fully understand. The unconstrained vision believes human nature is malleable, even perfectible. Give us enlightened leadership, proper education, rational planning, and we can transcend our limitations. This is Rousseau's noble savage corrupted by bad institutions. This is the modern progressive seeing every social problem as solvable with enough political will. Neither vision is stupid. They're both internally coherent. But they're running completely different operating systems. Watch how this single difference cascades into every political position: On healthcare, the constrained vision asks: Who decides? Who pays? What are the trade-offs? The unconstrained vision says healthcare is a human right, and the only obstacle is political will. On crime, one sees human nature plus bad incentives. The other sees systemic injustice creating criminals who wouldn't exist in a just society. On education, one trusts evolved competition between schools. The other trusts expert planners to design the optimal system. The deepest divide is about knowledge itself. The constrained vision believes knowledge is embedded in evolved systems: market prices, cultural traditions, common law. No expert or committee can possibly know enough to redesign society from scratch. This is Hayek's fatal conceit. The unconstrained vision believes articulated reason trumps tradition. Enlightened minds can see what the masses cannot. Progress requires trusting experts to override outdated customs and redesign institutions rationally. This is why your debates with colleagues go nowhere. The constrained vision asks: \"Compared to what alternative?\" It deals in trade-offs, second-order effects, unintended consequences. The unconstrained vision asks: \"Compared to what's possible?\" It seeks solutions, not compromises. It judges systems by their ideals, not their alternatives. You're not even playing the same game. Once you see this framework, everything clicks into place. This isn't about intelligence or compassion. It's not really about left versus right. It's about whether you believe human limitations are binding constraints we must accommodate, or temporary obstacles we can overcome through reason and will. Every other political position flows downstream from this foundational assumption. Understanding this changes how you engage with the world. You stop wasting energy arguing surface-level facts with people who have incompatible premises. You start recognizing the deeper vision driving their positions. You can predict where people will land on new issues before they even speak. You gain the ability to address root assumptions instead of spinning your wheels on symptoms. You become someone who actually understands the structure of political conflict, not just another person shouting into the void. Thomas Sowell spent five decades developing frameworks that help you think clearly about politics, economics, and culture. His work teaches you to identify weak arguments, question comfortable narratives, and see through the statistical manipulation that dominates public discourse. Want to learn how to think like him? We built something specifically for students who are tired of being intellectually gaslit on campus. How to Not Be An NPC: Think Like Thomas Sowell A free 5-day email course that teaches you to think independently in environments hostile to independent thought. Day 1: Why \"cosmic justice\" doesn't exist, and how that makes you manipulable Day 2: The 3 questions that expose weak arguments Days 3-5: How to decide, what limits central planning, why culture evolves Access: https://buff.ly/5MtORDC Source:
Girino Vey!'s avatar
Girino Vey! 1 month ago
image NOVA DIRETRIZ O presidente Lula sancionou, na segunda (17), uma lei que proíbe a utilização da linguagem neutra por órgãos e entidades da administração pública nas esferas federal, estadual e municipal. A nova diretriz orienta que os órgãos públicos priorizem frases curtas, em ordem direta e com voz ativa, utilizando palavras comuns e evitando jargões e estrangeirismos. O texto, que entra em vigor imediatamente, também inclui a revisão de portais e documentos oficiais já publicados. Leia no InfoMoney: https://inf.money/H187kb9g@l Foto: Marcelo Camargo/Agência Brasil #Política #LinguagemNeutra #Português #Governo Source:
Girino Vey!'s avatar
Girino Vey! 1 month ago
image Cuidado gente, começa com one piece, e termina na mesa do xandão!
Girino Vey!'s avatar
Girino Vey! 1 month ago
🚨 PROOF OF CONCEPT: GPU-NIP13-MINER I've just released a proof of concept that demonstrates how GPU usage can make NIP-13 (proof-of-work) completely unviable. Bots using GPU are over ONE ORDER OF MAGNITUDE faster than CPUs: 📊 BENCHMARKS: ┌─────────────────────────┬──────────────┬─────────────┐ │ Hardware │ Kernel │ Performance │ ├─────────────────────────┼──────────────┼─────────────┤ │ CPU (i5-9500T) │ default │ 1.18M/s │ │ Intel GPU (UHD 630) │ default │ 2.67M/s │ │ NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti │ ckolivas │ 60.15M/s │ │ NVIDIA Quadro P2200 │ ckolivas │ 45.01M/s │ └─────────────────────────┴──────────────┴─────────────┘ A mid-range NVIDIA GPU is ~50x faster than a modern CPU. This means any bot using GPU will have a massive advantage over normal users on CPU, making NIP-13 ineffective as an anti-spam mechanism. 🔗 Repository: #NIP13 #Nostr #ProofOfWork #GPU #Mining #OpenCL
Girino Vey!'s avatar
Girino Vey! 1 month ago
image 🚨 MEXICO JUST BLEW WIDE OPEN — A SITTING SENATOR SAYS THE PRESIDENT WORKS FOR THE CARTELS 🇲🇽🔥 The massive Gen Z protests exploding across Mexico City suddenly make perfect sense after what a Mexican Senator just revealed on Fox News. According to her: 💥 “The President of Mexico works for the cartels.” 💥 Claudia Sheinbaum was funded with cartel money. 💥 Morena is financed by cartels — that’s how they win elections. 💥 Mexico is now a full-blown narco-state. 💥 Once elected, politicians are expected to protect the cartels. 💥 Ordinary Mexicans are terrified of the government–cartel alliance. And the second she said it publicly? 🔥 The President of Mexico threatened her with criminal prosecution. 🔥 She says they’re trying to throw her in prison for talking to Fox News. Meanwhile, the country is erupting: ➡️ Mayor Carlos Manzo — a major cartel critic — was assassinated. ➡️ Protesters are clashing with riot police. ➡️ Government buildings are being stormed. ➡️ Officers are being hospitalized by the dozens. This isn’t “unrest.” This is what it looks like when a population realizes its entire government is owned by the cartel machine. And the wildest part? She says Mexicans who aren’t bought off are begging Donald Trump to intervene — because their own leaders are compromised from top to bottom. 🇲🇽 Mexico isn’t unstable — it’s in open revolt against a cartel-captured government. Not sure if this is a trusted source, so if anyone in mexico can answer it, id Source: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1422595959870643