No underline
The problem with markdown.
I know there are years of discussion around this, yet it still wasn't added because of breaking changes.
I'll write a non-breaking stanrdard and implement in my projects. I'm tired of waiting.
Will share when it's done.
We'll... probably get the new GTA way sooner than expected, unofficially, because of decompilation via AI use.
I'm pretty conscious about myself, basically being able to detatched yourself from yourself, but I noticed I'm still weak against negative changes that may happen to my biologoy that alter the way I think, which may result in decisions I would have otherwise not taken.
Happened 3 times in my adult life, though thankfully didn't take any bad decisions, where i know other people have, so that's a good indication that I have good control.
But oh boy is it hard x3
Best way to not lose yourself when it happens, at least for me thinking about it now, is to recall that this isn't you, it's just that something got screwed up in your biology that's making you think that way, and that thought alone would make you go "ok hold on, i'm in a bad state, chill, relax, do something that makes you happy, it'll pass", and usually it does.
"Yes, withholding your account access unless you provide pictures of your face is a form of coercion, manipulation, and digital extortion"
Seems like I'll have to do one major change to den chat to solve a worse-case scenario that comes as a result of relays' event size limit of 64kb, basically moving channels/roles/grouped-roles/categories into a blossom file and referencing it in the hub event, which will result in a bit more time loading or updating a hub when modifying any of those, otherwise i'd have to heavily cap them all which isn't desireable by anyone, so basically oh well it is what it is.
*sigh...
ok so i'll be adding "updated_at", "<timestamp:now>" tag in nip-chat/denchat for conflict resolution (and ux in ui bonus) next to the "published_at","<first timestamp>" next to the rule of "created_at", "current+1", all of this just because we don't have a published_at like created_at consideration for nostr relay filtering.
Apparently a bunch (if not a lot?) of people think that the censorship-resistance benefit of nostr is a too-good-to-be-true thing, where for some reason they don't want to do a "grok is this true?" quick look up to verify the factual benefit.
Oh well.
"You seem to be having a hard time. Would you like to decrease the difficulty level of the game?"
Assuming it's a good game, this popup / question is not a bad thing, nor is it condescending from the developer side.
My response?
Most of the time: "Fuck you, no, I'll beat this shit"
Another valid response someone may have:
"Ya sure, I got don't have time to figure things out"
or
"Ya sure, while I do have time and could figure things out, don't feel like it, i just want to shut my brain off."
*sigh....
There really hasn't been an awesome racing game like NSF:MW (the og one). Almost all modern racing game are borning af in comparison.
Our protocol is under attack
