bitcoms's avatar
bitcoms
bitcoms@nostrplebs.com
npub18s6a...eqxk
Writing and photographing Bitcoin
bitcoms's avatar
bitcoms 11 months ago
The FT getting itself into a bit of a muddle with its lead article this morning. It ‘fears’ that investors want to fall for Trump’s shitcoin scams, but are instead falling for copycat shitcoin scams passing themselves off as Trump shitcoin scams. Oh dear. image
bitcoms's avatar
bitcoms 11 months ago
Trump’s digital financial technology executive order is just politics as usual. In theory, the government makes decisions in the people’s best interests. In practice, the government makes decisions in big business’s best interest. That’s why the government promotes garbage food, harmful drugs which don’t work, constant warfare, etc. The centralised shitcoin industry was a huge donor to the Trump campaign. As a result, centralised shitcoins are likely to be promoted by the government. It’s just the way politics work. Trump even established himself as shitcoiner-in-chief before assuming office. Bitcoin may benefit by being included in any US initiatives or reserves. But Bitcoin will suffer because officialdom will legitimise centralised shitcoins.
bitcoms's avatar
bitcoms 1 year ago
Establishment media and regime academia are preparing the ground to blame Bitcoin for the inevitable future fiat and tradfi crises.
bitcoms's avatar
bitcoms 1 year ago
“He felt closer to dust, he said, than to light, air or water” WG Sebald, The Emigrants 1992 Frank Auerbach, Head of EOW 1960 (snap by me in 2023) image
bitcoms's avatar
bitcoms 1 year ago
BITCOIN IS 'GREEN' Many wrongly believe Bitcoin miners are devouring all the world’s energy and destroying the planet. This is due to erroneous ‘green’ anti-Bitcoin propaganda peddled by those who see Bitcoin as a threat, or (misguidedly) believe they are competing with it, or are simply poorly informed and parroting mainstream disinformation. Bitcoin consumes a lot of energy annually, but in world terms this is tiny: even a probable overestimate of low hundreds of terrawat hours per year is a tiny fraction of a single percent of global energy use. But unlike most activities, which use mostly carbon-based power, Bitcoin runs primarily on sustainable energy, making it far ‘greener’ than other industries in terms of carbon emissions. Worse, those advocating against Bitcoin from a carbon perspective have it backwards, because they fail to grasp the network’s revolutionary utility and efficiency: they should instead campaign to have energy-guzzling classical payments systems replaced by Bitcoin, as this would result in vastly reduced energy use, as well as a consequentially far lower 'carbon footprint'. And what about methane, which is widely considered orders of magnitude worse for atmospheric warming than carbon dioxide? Bitcoin is already eliminating methane emitted by natural gas flaring, landfill sites and animal farms. At scale, this could contribute significantly to achieving emission reduction targets. Agile and mobile, Bitcoin miners are also happy to be intermittent power consumers, helping to balance grids by using off-peak excess generation, improving overall system efficiency and thereby reducing consumption and emissions. None of this is because Bitcoin desires to be ‘green’. It’s just that Bitcoin miners' incentives – to use the cheapest electricity they can find – aligns with using otherwise wasted energy which doesn’t have rival consumers. Because renewable electricity generation is often inefficient and wasteful, and many energy sources are not exploitable by grids, Bitcoin gravitates towards their cheap, otherwise stranded power. Bitcoin is ‘green’.
bitcoms's avatar
bitcoms 1 year ago
BITCOIN IS NOT A PONZI “A Ponzi scheme is an investment fraud that pays existing investors with funds collected from new investors… Ponzi scheme organizers often promise high returns with little or no risk. Instead, they use money from new investors to pay earlier investors and may steal some of the money for themselves.” - US Securities and Exchange Commission Many governments such as the UK and US have large debts and spend more than they earn. They repay existing debts by taking on new debt. They pay returns and portray themselves as ‘risk free’. And by continuing to run spending deficits, the governments always take some of the money for themselves. Given this, government debt schemes such as US Treasuries and UK Gilts look very much like Ponzi schemes. With only a small percentage of cash reserves compared with customer deposits, fractionally-reserved commercial banks can often only repay existing customers with new cash deposits. They also promise returns in the form of interest with little or no risk. And by charging fees and paying out less interest than they earn from depositors’ funds, they always take some money for themselves. Therefore commercial banks also resemble Ponzi schemes. Cryptos (as distinct from Bitcoin) typically have Ponzi-like features. Insiders often receive a large proportion of the coins ‘pre-mine’, generate hype around the retail launch and drive up (‘pump’) the price. They then sell (‘dump’) their large stake to new investors, crashing the price and leaving outsiders holding all the coins. They often entice victims by promising high returns in the form of ‘yield’, normally above prevailing market interest rates. By contrast, bitcoin holders are promised no repayment, returns, interest or yield. The only payments Bitcoin makes are to nodes called ‘miners’ (which need not already hold any bitcoin) for providing transaction processing and security services. Bitcoin makes no claims about risk, and does not receive or steal any money. Bitcoin isn’t even an investment scheme – it’s simply a monetary good. Unlike government bonds, commercial banks and many cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin exhibits no Ponzi-like characteristics. Bitcoin is not a Ponzi.