Libertarian Warrior 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿👨‍🌾🥩🥇🥈's avatar
Libertarian Warrior 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿👨‍🌾🥩🥇🥈
libertarian@iris.to
npub18276...qckc
Private Investor | Libertarian | Anarcho Capitalist XMR tips: 85dCUZWbLaZcQDyyWCJS7DeMkGBeytdAVVzgMjns1AsNcTYiNu3kcVDccESYNGB6qUQzJpSvZiZZzYQrk3vA1qLvC15N9S6
As usual, it appears that the biggest people traffickers, gangsters and criminals are governments, in particular the British and French governments.
"All of these people [in the UK government] are Fabians, and Fabianism in a nutshell is gradualism. It believes in the slow creep of communism... That's now what we're seeing with digital ID." "Ultimately, it will lead us to a point where we are essentially another China. That is what Keir Starmer wants." "So if we want to resist that gradual decline, we have to decide what hill we're prepared to die on. And for me, that's civil liberty." "If you cannot spend money without the state interfering, if you can't get a job, if you can't be educated without the state interfering, then you are already on the brink of communism." Source ( more content like this, subscribe to @RealWideAwakeMedia Merch:
Inflation is taxation by FRAUD and currency laundering which is directly used to confiscate wealth, assets and income from we the people. Rising prices are not “inflation” but the consequence of inflation of the currency supply, which is literally FRAUD.
The most cost effective, beautiful, efficient and sustainable carbon capture machine of them all.🦚 image
Shadow Flights Out of Gaza: The Opaque Operation Moving Palestinians to South Africa A chartered flight carrying 153 Palestinians from Gaza has arrived in South Africa under circumstances that are raising serious questions… The passengers reached Johannesburg without proper visas, without exit stamps from Israel, and without any clear documentation explaining who approved their departure or how the journey was arranged. They were moved out of Gaza by bus through the Kerem Shalom crossing, taken to Ramon Airport, and placed on a flight organised by an obscure group called Al Majd Europe, which has been presenting itself as a humanitarian organisation while charging people substantial amounts of money for evacuation. Al Majd Europe offers almost no verifiable information about its structure, provides no proper contact details, and appears to have been founded or operated by an individual with Israeli and Estonian citizenship, while also coordinating directly with Israeli authorities to move people through Israeli controlled crossings and airports. South African officials have said openly that the operation looked like part of a broader effort to remove Palestinians from their land, since the passengers appeared confused, unprepared, and in some cases unaware of their final destination, and the government was left to decide how to handle an unannounced arrival of more than one hundred people who lacked the standard entry requirements. This combination of secrecy, conflicting information, and unexplained access to Israeli channels has fuelled concern that what is being presented as a humanitarian evacuation may in fact be tied to a quiet and politically convenient relocation effort, carried out through an organisation that exists almost entirely in the shadows. image
Being critical of Islam ruled a protected belief in the UKSSR. 🥳🥳 The right to criticise Islam is protected under UK equality law, a judge has ruled. His ruling came at an employment tribunal hearing for Patrick Lee, found guilty of misconduct in April 2024 by the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (IFoA) following a four-year disciplinary process. Mr Lee was banned from the IFoA and ordered to pay nearly £23,000 in costs after the trade body decided that 42 of his posts on X about Islam were “offensive or inflammatory or both” and that 29 were “designed to demean or insult Muslims”. Mr Lee’s posts were certainly robust, calling Islam “backward”, “a con trick” and “a dangerous cult” – and the Prophet Mohammed “a monster”. But Judge David Khan accepted the argument that “Islam-critical” beliefs are protected under the Equality Act 2010: the first time a British court has done so. The story isn’t over yet. There’ll be a final hearing in February to decide whether Mr Lee’s tweets were an appropriate manifestation of this protected belief (which the judge has already suggested they were) – and the Free Speech Union will, of course, be helping with his legal costs. In the meantime though, Judge Khan’s ruling has obvious implications for the government’s beleaguered plans to introduce an official definition of ‘Islamophobia’. As Free Speech Union Director Lord Young wrote in the Telegraph: “In future, anyone penalised for saying something ‘Islamophobic’ will be able to refer to this judgment. That renders the government’s efforts to roll out an official definition largely pointless. “Being critical of Islam is not tantamount to harassing individual Muslims. The judge grasped the point, accepting that Mr Lee was ‘critical of certain Islamic doctrines and practices’, but not of ‘individual followers’. In case after case we’ve fought, this distinction is blurred, with people penalised for disrespecting the holders of certain beliefs when they’re only guilty of disrespecting those beliefs. If you conflate criticism of someone’s beliefs with harassment it should be obvious that will have a profoundly chilling effect on free speech.” image