Libertarian Warrior 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿👨‍🌾🥩🥇🥈's avatar
Libertarian Warrior 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿👨‍🌾🥩🥇🥈
libertarian@iris.to
npub18276...qckc
Private Investor | Libertarian | Anarcho Capitalist XMR tips: 85dCUZWbLaZcQDyyWCJS7DeMkGBeytdAVVzgMjns1AsNcTYiNu3kcVDccESYNGB6qUQzJpSvZiZZzYQrk3vA1qLvC15N9S6
Shadow Flights Out of Gaza: The Opaque Operation Moving Palestinians to South Africa A chartered flight carrying 153 Palestinians from Gaza has arrived in South Africa under circumstances that are raising serious questions… The passengers reached Johannesburg without proper visas, without exit stamps from Israel, and without any clear documentation explaining who approved their departure or how the journey was arranged. They were moved out of Gaza by bus through the Kerem Shalom crossing, taken to Ramon Airport, and placed on a flight organised by an obscure group called Al Majd Europe, which has been presenting itself as a humanitarian organisation while charging people substantial amounts of money for evacuation. Al Majd Europe offers almost no verifiable information about its structure, provides no proper contact details, and appears to have been founded or operated by an individual with Israeli and Estonian citizenship, while also coordinating directly with Israeli authorities to move people through Israeli controlled crossings and airports. South African officials have said openly that the operation looked like part of a broader effort to remove Palestinians from their land, since the passengers appeared confused, unprepared, and in some cases unaware of their final destination, and the government was left to decide how to handle an unannounced arrival of more than one hundred people who lacked the standard entry requirements. This combination of secrecy, conflicting information, and unexplained access to Israeli channels has fuelled concern that what is being presented as a humanitarian evacuation may in fact be tied to a quiet and politically convenient relocation effort, carried out through an organisation that exists almost entirely in the shadows. image
Being critical of Islam ruled a protected belief in the UKSSR. 🥳🥳 The right to criticise Islam is protected under UK equality law, a judge has ruled. His ruling came at an employment tribunal hearing for Patrick Lee, found guilty of misconduct in April 2024 by the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (IFoA) following a four-year disciplinary process. Mr Lee was banned from the IFoA and ordered to pay nearly £23,000 in costs after the trade body decided that 42 of his posts on X about Islam were “offensive or inflammatory or both” and that 29 were “designed to demean or insult Muslims”. Mr Lee’s posts were certainly robust, calling Islam “backward”, “a con trick” and “a dangerous cult” – and the Prophet Mohammed “a monster”. But Judge David Khan accepted the argument that “Islam-critical” beliefs are protected under the Equality Act 2010: the first time a British court has done so. The story isn’t over yet. There’ll be a final hearing in February to decide whether Mr Lee’s tweets were an appropriate manifestation of this protected belief (which the judge has already suggested they were) – and the Free Speech Union will, of course, be helping with his legal costs. In the meantime though, Judge Khan’s ruling has obvious implications for the government’s beleaguered plans to introduce an official definition of ‘Islamophobia’. As Free Speech Union Director Lord Young wrote in the Telegraph: “In future, anyone penalised for saying something ‘Islamophobic’ will be able to refer to this judgment. That renders the government’s efforts to roll out an official definition largely pointless. “Being critical of Islam is not tantamount to harassing individual Muslims. The judge grasped the point, accepting that Mr Lee was ‘critical of certain Islamic doctrines and practices’, but not of ‘individual followers’. In case after case we’ve fought, this distinction is blurred, with people penalised for disrespecting the holders of certain beliefs when they’re only guilty of disrespecting those beliefs. If you conflate criticism of someone’s beliefs with harassment it should be obvious that will have a profoundly chilling effect on free speech.” image
Racist! The Word That Conquered the West | Celina "Racist! The Word That Conquered the West" exposes how the term "racist" was weaponized by globalist elites-inspired by Jewish intellectuals like Leon Trotsky and Franz Boas-to silence Western men. Trotsky's seminal work, "The History of the Russian Revolution" (1930-1932), laid the groundwork for its post-WWII adoption by Western intellectuals. The utopian vision of interchangeable citizens, championed by figures like George Soros, has frayed social bonds, eroded trust, and fueled polarization. Decades of mass immigration-often pushed by Jewish advocacy groups like the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS)-have led to parallel societies. Western leaders' multiculturalism, shaped by Jewish thinkers like Herbert Marcuse, masquerades as moral law. Reality will strike back, as evidenced by Yugoslavia's brutal ethnic wars-fostered by a communist regime heavily influenced by Jewish ideologues. The West faces an ominous future unless it acknowledges the importance of cohesion, trust, and common identity-values increasingly undermined by the very elites who claim to represent them. 🔥 White Europeans have the inalienable right to preserve their racial and cultural identity-just like every other group. Why are we the only ones denied this basic human dignity? ⚠️ Follow: @JustDudeChannel 😎 ⚠️ Archived On Rumble 🔻 https://rumble.com/v71iczu-racist-the-word-that-conquered-the-west-celina.html
The EU Ministry of Truth (Narrative Control & Tyranny) “The EU loves talking about freedom. Just look at one of its recent press releases, launching something called the European Democracy Shield, which promises to protect everything from “free people” to “free elections” to — this being Brussels — “a vibrant civil society”. All admirable stuff, perhaps, at least on paper. In reality, though, the Democracy Shield is just the latest vision in unfreedom: suppressing dissent and policing speech under the pretext of defending democracy from foreign interference and fake news.“ “Seen in this context, the Democracy Shield appears like nothing more than a tool to further institutionalise a regime of managed speech and narrative control. Its goal is to police online speech according to vague, politically charged definitions of “disinformation”; to compel platforms, journalists, academics and citizens alike to conform to a narrow, Commission-approved worldview; and to silence dissent in the name of “fighting foreign interference”. Yet it is becoming increasingly clear that the real war on democracy isn’t being waged by Moscow or Beijing; it is being waged from within, by the very institutions claiming to defend it.“
“BBC: People warning about there being a centralised, global shift towards eating insects is hindering the centralised, global shift towards eating insects.” image
[In the UK] The Police Are Preparing for Civil War and They Are The Enemy!
How much energy is required to build a single wind turbine? Eye-opening video exposes the staggering quantity of energy and resources required to build just a single wind turbine. These turbine cause great damage to nature, cost a fortune and what are the gains? Follow Us -> Conspiracy Theory👤 (