If people are serious about wanting to limit spam. They should just build consensus around a fork to reduce block size.
McCoy
McCoy@primal.net
npub18y33...x5t7
Bitcoin
NOSTR block 768722
All the BTC two year gain occurred at the launch of the ETFs.
Flat or down since.
Two year bear market about to end.....



Fountain
ODELL contentious SOFTFORK scenario • Clip by @mccoy • Listen on Fountain
Clipped from Rabbit Hole Recap • RABBIT HOLE RECAP #381: BITCOIN IS THE BEST MONEY
https://rhr.tv/stream
- update your mints https://primal.net/...
Bitcoin is hard to change
Signing off
5-10 year coma
Will wake up in Valhalla
A contentious soft fork can become "User-Activated" (UASF). *Economic nodes* (exchanges, wallets, payment processors) would need to build rough consensus and PRE-COMMIT to enforcing the new rules by a specific date, regardless of miner signaling
If successful contentious softfork avoided
Wen polymarket for a softfork chain split?
Polymarket could play a large role in a contentious soft fork. It creates a market without having to list both coins at the exchanges.
The relationship between bitcoin versus regulators / law-enforcement, is far more nuanced than saying:
"If somebody does something illegal on Bitcoin, then unbounded criminal liability attaches to everyone who's running a node or mining bitcoin."