close to my opinion, except for the view of this pull request

X (formerly Twitter)

Chris Guida | ⚡🪢 BIP110 (@cguida6) on X

My opening statement from the debate yesterday @btcplusplus: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Good afternoon bitcoin developers, noderunners, ...

That's nice! That's the only way to counter "Washington". WHO IS JOHN GALT?

I frequently delete and repost posts because my brain structure is uneven, high for logical and creative, but low for working memory and quantity. That's the excuse I use.

I'm not focusing on MoE, more narrowly, it's on just "spending online"🫡

:shakingeyes_sm:

GitHub

GitHub - MetaMask/bdk-wasm: The Bitcoin Dev Kit for Browsers and Node

The Bitcoin Dev Kit for Browsers and Node. Contribute to MetaMask/bdk-wasm development by creating an account on GitHub.

Satoshi Nakamoto was building an imaginary future. That embraced the right fundamental principles but was sketchy on the details. This is true for everyone and natural for how to build an imaginary future. A typical pros and cons was not sticking to a pure monetary protocol. It gave creative room and was representative of the romanticism like inscribed in the first block, which contributed to early adoption and susequent evolution, but as it grew, problems grew. This was a inevitable progression. That is, the 0 to 1 phase was over, and we are moving to the 10 to 100 phase. IMO it's natural for how to build an imaginary future.

"The Big Block is in all of our hearts" (english to japanese translation to english re-translation)

me seeing discourse denying UASF and celebrating BSV architecture

X (formerly Twitter)

Rob Hamilton (@Rob1Ham) on X

Bitcoin is an economic network, not a democracy. Node count is irrelevant, how many coins are being secured by a node, “economic nodes” is wha...

Seemingly Bitcoin github account has a strong opinion. That's nice! dev is not a tool for biz and users. Just one of humarns. What do you think motivates us?

"Remove the OP_RETURN restriction to match taproot" is retarded. If taproot is brought up, the necessary question is "was taproot a failure?". Any discussion that leaves out "what bitcoin is" is generally futile.

@YakiHonne I used yakihonne to port a few articles from another blog service to nostr. I'll give you some feedback. - I don't know if I'm successful when I press the publish button. I was often kicked with 401. But I couldn't see anything on the screen. I had to open the dev tool console to check. - Drafts aren't displayed for each article. Even if I press "Edit article" for each article, the last saved article continues to be displayed. - The editor doesn't work in firefox. The focus shifts and I can't enter or delete as I want. - The first request when logging in doesn't seem to await decrypt, so the signer request is displayed all at once. The first two were both solved by super reloading. But when it worked, yakihonne was a good service. I hope this helps. Thanks.

※本記事は別サービスで2023年2月10日に公開した記事の移植です。

me finding a bug in a planned release build

me having been opening nostr app on a public line, not Wi-Fi

me having been told that the bird I thought was a nostr was actually a twitter

me having discovered a real problem while building an imaginary future

:funkycat:

"password"って言葉の起源はもともとは忍者同士の合言葉みたいなものだったんだよなあ〜

In Japan, following the incident in which smartphone data was "stolen" during immigration screening in the United States, there has been a bit of buzz about advice to disable passkeys (biometric locks on devices) and switch to passcodes. The reason for this is said to be that, unlike biometric authentication, there is a high possibility that people will be able to refuse to present a passcode under the Fifth Amendment to the US Constitution. Is this true?

Most of security features are imaginary futures, because they are designed to deal with incidents that haven't happened yet.