when you think shes the one but she’s actually just mossad

whos pamped for sports ball. go sea hooks View quoted note →

one nuance to this: when one says "meritocracy" in reality what you're really doing is subscribing to a core-dev "web of trust" (since @david @ManiMe nerd sniped me on decentralized web of trust stuff recently) if this web of trust (who vouches for who and what they agree on) could be visualized, it might be easier to see what flavor of bitcoin you're getting into (knots, etc) which would have a different web of trust wrt. engineering decisions how bitcoin evolves is determined by which economic nodes subscribe to which WoT... i think this is the most accurate definition of what bitcoin is and what its future trajectory is? I currently trust the existing core devs who have made what bitcoin is up to this point, since they have the most experience. luke's WoT is a lot smaller and therefore it's not really safe to join IMO. View quoted note →

actually amazed the filteroors are still going at i, didn’t they lose the debate when bitcoin didn’t die during the version update?

bitcoin core devs will need to be like the delta force of software and systems engineers. most people are not going to be able to handle this level of stress and attacks from tens of thousands of bad actors and governments, they will need to be built different.

guys are you paying attention to your clawdbots

my entire professional identity over the past week has been obliterated: things I thought I was unique at and only i could do, now anyone can do. i'm loving it though, now I'm graduating to the next level: leveraging multiple instances of ai coders simulatenously to amplify my own effectiveness. ego dies, progress marches on.

I almost miss having fiat to buy these dips