The Federal Reserve wrote down a target for how fast your dollar should lose value. The date on the page is January 25, 2012. Before that there was no number. The law told the Fed to pursue "stable prices" and for decades nobody wrote down what that meant. Then, on a Wednesday afternoon, a committee decided stable meant "inflation at the rate of 2 percent," published it, and promised to reaffirm it every January. Two percent a year halves your money in about 35 years. That is the plan when everything goes right. Since that page went up, the dollar has lost about a third of its purchasing power. The target was 2. The result has been closer to 3 than 2. The same committee meets again on Wednesday to set the rate for the year ahead, and nobody outside the room gets a vote. A target for losing value is still a policy of losing value. It just has a number on it now. Bitcoin's issuance schedule was also written down, in 2008. It has been hit every year since, and nobody has ever had to meet.

On Wednesday a committee at the Federal Reserve will vote on the price of your money. Markets put the odds of a hike near 80%. On Thursday a developer on a Bitcoin fork floated pausing that chain's new coin issuance for a month, to push back on miners he says are there only for the fees. A month of new coins, held back by decision. And it isn't surprising. The BIP-110 coin exists because its developers changed Bitcoin's rules once to create it. When the chain stalled in August, they changed the rules again to get it moving. A third change to discipline the miners follows logically from the first two, and there will be a fourth. The moment a money's rules bend for one good reason, it has a process for bending, and every future reason will find that process. That is the entire history of the dollar: not one bad decision, but a precedent, then a committee, then a calendar of meetings. Which is why Bitcoin has the best defence ever built against people who need to be in charge of the money. It lets them. Anyone who wants to bend the rules can take their ball and go home. Copy the code, change what you like, go play with your friends. Bitcoin doesn't stop you and it doesn't follow you. It stays exactly where it was, running the same rules it ran in 2009, for everyone who didn't leave. The dollar has no exit like that. Its control freaks stay in the building. The people who most want to change Bitcoin end up holding something else.

In 1992 the U.S. State Department told a Berkeley math student that his encryption code was a weapon. Not a figure of speech. A letter, dated August 20, 1992, from the Office of Defense Trade Controls: Daniel Bernstein's algorithm was "designated as a defense article under U.S. Munitions List Category XIII(b)(1)." The same list as bombs. Using it at home was legal. Posting it where a foreigner could read it was arms trafficking, and the State Department told him not to bother applying for a licence, because the code was too secure to approve. He sued in 1995. In April 1996 a federal judge ruled that source code is speech. In 1999 the appeals court agreed, and the export rules came down. Every bitcoin key you hold is protected by the class of math that Washington classified as a munition within living memory. It didn't become legal to share because the government changed its mind. It became legal because one graduate student refused to register as an arms dealer. The next time someone tells you self-custody is paranoid, remember that the official position, not long ago, was that the tools for it should not be allowed to leave the country.

Canada's bank regulator, yesterday: "Tokenized deposits are, for example, not legally distinct from traditional deposits." Correct. A deposit is money the bank owes you. Put that IOU on a blockchain and it is still the same IOU controlled by a third party. It just gains the buzzword "blockchain" for marketing purposes. Bitcoin at an address you control is the one thing on the list that nobody owes you because you truly own it yourself.

The Rabbit Hole Has an Exit: 25 Years of 9/11, a Lifetime of Psyops, and Why I Ended Up in Bitcoin

Two headlines from the last 24 hours. - Washington is talking about mailing every adult $5,000. - U.S. Bank tested a dollar it can freeze and claw back. Money that can be promised from a stage and pulled back by a bank is the money your retirement account is denominated in. Every fund in it. Every bond. This fall the Bitcoin Well IRA lets Americans hold real bitcoin inside a Traditional or Roth IRA. Not a fund that holds a company that holds bitcoin. Actual coins, at an address you can check on-chain, any day you feel like checking. Three companies, one job each. We source the bitcoin. Heritage IRA administers the account. BitGo holds the coins in qualified custody. If a $5,000 check ever lands, you'll already know where the money nobody can print more of lives. Waitlist in the comments.

"I am the house now." That was the US Treasury Secretary yesterday, daring traders to bet against the yen. In 1992 Scott Bessent was 29 years old and helped George Soros break the Bank of England for $1,000,000,000. He knows exactly what he is saying. Here is what the house has been doing. The yen fell to 164 per dollar in July, its weakest in nearly four decades. Japan spent the equivalent of $98,600,000,000 in four weeks buying it back, the largest intervention on record, with the US Treasury joining in for the first time since 1998. To pay for it, Japan sold $87,800,000,000 of foreign bonds in August, and Japan's foreign bonds are mostly US Treasuries. Japan is America's largest foreign lender. So America helped Japan sell America's debt to prop up Japan's money, then doubled its own bond buybacks to undo what that selling did to America's borrowing costs. Every fiat currency is backed by another fiat promise. The yen by Treasuries, Treasuries by the dollar, the dollar by Japan agreeing to keep holding Treasuries. Pull one and the rest have to move. The house always wins because the house writes the rules and can rewrite them mid-hand. Until the day everyone at the table notices the emperor has no clothes. Bitcoin is the one table with no house. The rules are the rules, and nobody, not even a Treasury Secretary, sits on the other side of them.

Bitcoin Didn't Break. The $320M Shortcut Built on Top of It Did.

X (formerly Twitter)

Bitcoin Well

Bitcoin Didn't Break. The $320M Shortcut Built on Top of It Did.

Labor Day question for our American readers: where is the 401(k) from the job you left? It's still there. Sitting in your old employer's plan, in a fund lineup somebody in HR picked, earning whatever the market hands it. You didn't choose those funds. You can't put bitcoin in them. An eligible 401(k) or IRA can be rolled over into a Bitcoin Well IRA, and rollovers don't have the annual cap contributions do. Money you already earned, moved into real bitcoin you can verify on-chain, inside the same tax-advantaged structure. Not advice. Eligibility depends on your plan and your situation. But the money is yours, and "I haven't thought about it in years" is not a plan. Launching this fall:

The idea behind every bitcoin key you own was rejected as a homework assignment. Fall 1974. Ralph Merkle, an undergraduate at Berkeley, submits a project proposal for his computer security course: a way for two strangers to agree on a secret over a wire anyone can listen to. The professor turns it down. Merkle rewrites it shorter, resubmits, gets it back with notes in the margin, and drops the course. He keeps working on it anyway. In August 1975 he sends the paper to the Communications of the ACM. The anonymous reviewer's verdict: "not in the main stream of present cryptography thinking." It took almost three years to get published. By then the world had named it: public key cryptography. He wasn't done. In 1979 he worked out how to fold thousands of records into one fingerprint you can check in seconds. Bitcoin calls it the Merkle root. There is one in the header of every block. You see, the experts weren't lying. They were describing the mainstream, accurately. The mainstream was wrong. Bitcoin is built almost entirely out of ideas that were turned down first. That should make you more comfortable holding it, not less.

The list is a weapon

Gold just had its worst quarter since 2013. Tether bought 14 more tonnes into it. The pile now runs past 146 tonnes, roughly double what Australia's central bank holds. The largest issuer of digital dollars on earth spent a falling market accumulating the one money that has never had an issuer. You can read that as a trade or as a tell. Either way, the version of it available to you needs no vault, no attestation and no quarterly report from an accounting firm. Buy spot bitcoin and take it off the exchange yourself.

I dug my old Ledger out of a drawer this morning. Hadn't touched it in years. The screen is so faded I could barely make out the characters. So the thing going around yesterday is true. The screen on the Ledger Nano S fades with age. Nothing gets hacked and nothing gets tampered with, an old display just goes too faint to read. @janrothen posted about it and is past 189,000 views. Nick Neuman at Casa said the same thing five days earlier, and the two of them independently landed on the same workaround. Point your phone camera at the device and read the screen off your phone instead. A camera sensor gathers far more light than your eye does and holds it longer, so a display that looks blank to you comes back sharp in your hand. Dim the room, get close, pinch to zoom. Now notice what a faded screen is not. Your bitcoin was never on that device and could not have been. It is a record on Bitcoin's ledger, and thousands of machines are holding a copy of it right now. The device signs. It does not store. A faded screen is not a lost balance so much as it is an annoyance if you backed up your seed phrase. Go make sure you can still read your ledger and move your seed to a new device when you get a chance. No rush.

Saturday question. What was the first thing you ever actually bought with bitcoin? Not traded. Bought. Mine was a bottle of wine at the corner store using a Bitcoin debit card in 2018. Of course the person behind the counter had no idea.

Self-custody shouldn't feel like defusing a bomb with the wires unlabeled. This week, Bitcoin Guidance is free. A private, one-on-one call with a real Bitcoin expert who walks you through it live: setting up your own wallet, moving your coins safely, and backing up your keys so a lost phone never means a lost fortune. No sales pitch. No jargon wall. Just a human who stays on the line until it's done and it actually makes sense to you. After the couple of weeks Bitcoin holders just had, nobody should be guessing with their savings. Free for a few more days. Book a call:

Bitcoin Well

Bitcoin Guidance | Meet 1-on-1 with a Bitcoin Expert

Get personalized bitcoin guidance from our experts. Learn how to securely set up self-custody, understand bitcoin, and take control of your financi...

Self-custody is still the point

Gary Cardone looked at self-custody, saw a little friction, and said "GTFO, not scalable." That reflex is the entire reason Bitcoin had to exist. You see, the dice rolls aren't the point. They're a UX problem, and UX problems get solved. What doesn't get solved on its own is the mindset underneath the comment: the belief that doing the work yourself is beneath you, that "serious money" hands its keys to a suit and calls it control. It isn't control. The money an institution holds for you is the money that gets frozen, loaned out behind your back, and seized. Ask anyone whose account froze in 2022. Ask the Americans who lived through Executive Order 6102. The friction is temporary. The subservience is permanent, right up until the day you decide to hold your own keys. Serious money isn't the money a custodian guards. It's the money nobody can take. Not your keys, not your coins. Not your entropy, not your keys.

Everyone is watching whether Warsh raises rates a quarter point tomorrow. But that's the wrong number to be paying attention to. The only number that matters is $40 Trillion. And that number says, ultimately, this train only goes in one direction.

The Last Analog Man: What John C. Dvorak Understood About Value That the Algorithm Never Will

Bitcoin mining difficulty is on track to finish 2026 lower than it started. That would be the first annual decline in Bitcoin's history. So is it the beginning of the end? Difficulty is just a thermostat. When too many miners pile in, it climbs and crushes margins. When the overbuilt and overleveraged operators tap out, it falls and the survivors breathe again. That's a build in balancing system meeting the free market. And there is nothing to fear on the security side. The hashpower behind Bitcoin is orders of magnitude past what the network needs to stay safe. A drop of roughly 13.8% off record highs still leaves it parked near the most secure it has ever been. "No miners left" was never on the table. Here's the part the doomers miss. Lower difficulty means fatter margins for everyone still plugged in. It quietly invites the small, nimble, efficient miners back online, the ones who got priced out while the giants were flexing. The network doesn't get weaker. It gets more distributed. Bitcoin doesn't get a bailout when its miners overbuild. It adjusts, in public, and hands the advantage back to whoever is left and paying attention. The miners compete so you never have to trust any single one of them.