Bluacle? I kinda like it tbh (I didn't change all of the colors so some of the contrasts are weird)

Seems like Lightning AMP combined with a loop-out service would be potentially pretty powerful privacy tech. Of course you need PTLCs to defeat attackers along the route.

With Phoenix gone from the US market, is there any comparable service I can recommend to normies? I actually wonder if an uncle jim LSP would be an MSB... part of that distinction was always iirc frequency, and whether it was run "like a business". Plus you automagically meet KYC with uncle jim setups. Of course, feds seem to be tearing up the rulebook and doing whatever they feel like, but how are they gonna know anyway?...

The javascript ecosystem makes me extremely grumpy and afraid

@ hodlbod Is the way coracle renders code blocks intentional? It's very weird for code See: View quoted note →

Is there any nip that provides alternative download methods for links? If you imagine a kind 1 with an image linked in the content, you could include a tag that provides the sha256 for that URL, and maybe a list of blossom server hints, magnet link, etc. There's obviously A LOT of overlap with NIP-94 but it's still fairly distinct. #asknostr #nostrdev #nostr

Has anyone memed "great script restoration" as the "Great script Reset" yet?

Is there any built in nostr "verification" method? I'm imagining something like a bip-32 label that would indicate a user completed some form of verification, which applications can use as an anti-spam measure. The specific form of verification is irrelevant, and many providers could exist, they'd publish an event to indicate the result: { "tags": [ ["p": "verifiedpubkey...", ...], ["L": "verification"], ["l": "captcha-verified", "verification"], ], ... } { "tags": [ ["p": "verifiedpubkey...", ...], ["L": "verification"], ["l": "captcha-verified"], ["l": "email-verified", "verification"], ], ... } { "tags": [ ["p": "verifiedpubkey...", ...], ["L": "verification"], ["l": "phone-verified", "verification"], ], ... } { "tags": [ ["p": "verifiedpubkey...", ...], ["L": "verification"], ["l": "payment-verified", "verification"], ], ... } "payment-verified" might include the amount paid { "tags": [ ["p": "verifiedpubkey...", ...], ["L": "verification"], ["l": "fidelity-bonded", "verification"], ], ... } "fidelity-bonded" might include a UTXO and BIP-127 proof { "tags": [ ["p": "verifiedpubkey...", ...], ["L": "verification"], ["l": "twitter-verified", "verification"], ], ... } "twitter-verified" might include the URL of a tweet committing to the verifiedpubkey (and something from the verifiedpubkey committing to the twitter account?) I'm not sure if the extra information might warrant a different kind than normal labels.

Craig Wright is officially rekt!

Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

COPA -v- Wright - Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Neutral Citation Number: [2024] EWHC 1198 (Ch)Claim Nos. Il-2021-000019; Il-2022-000069 In the High Court of JusticeBusiness and Property Courts of...

"Why are you wasting energy on this clown?" It's been quite a soap opera to watch, but I'm glad it's over. I suppose there's the potential criminal prosecution though...

Am I crazy or is nip-56 a special case of nip-32? Why both and why a different kind?

@Guy Swann Hey are you going to Chillderburg this year?