Next step of this discussion will be Mepool Divergence. Let's prepare for it. View quoted note →

https://nitter.net/orangesurfbtc/status/1732799616335106255?s=46 View quoted note →

What is the best way to read a twitter thread without twitter account? View quoted note →

많은 사람들이 검열과 필터링을 혼동하고 있습니다. 규칙을 적용하는 것이 검열이라고 생각하면 모든 것이 검열이 될 수 있습니다. 심지어 노드가 유효한 트랜잭션을 검열할 수도 있습니다. 자세한 내용을 알고 싶으시다면 "표준 트랜잭션"을 검색해보세요. 따라서 어떤 규칙이 검열이라고 말하는 것은 무의미합니다. 혼란을 피하기 위해 이러한 용어를 명확히 해야 합니다. 저는 이 두 가지를 구분하기 위해 고민하고 있습니다. 다음은 제가 대략적으로 정의한 것입니다. 검열 검열은 트럭 운전사, 야당 등과 같은 개인을 금지하는 것입니다. OFAC 제재 목록이 정확한 예입니다.

Sanctions List Search

아시다시피, #비트코인은 검열 저항성이 있어 누군가 개인을 검열하려 해도 검열을 피할 수 있습니다. 필터링 필터링은 자체적인 규칙을 적용하는 것입니다. 그게 다입니다. 노드는 환경설정할 수 있으며, 환경설정한다는 것은 자체 규칙을 변경한다는 것을 의미합니다. 그러면 어떤 트랜잭션은 내 노드에서는 무효(릴레이되지 않음)이지만 다른 노드에서는 유효(릴레이됨)할 수 있습니다. 우리는 이것을 "검열"이라고 말하지 않습니다. 저는 루크-jr의 모든 것에 동의하는 것은 아니지만 그를 지지합니다.

A lot of people are confused between censorship and filtering. If you think that enforcing rules is a censorship, everyrhing going to be a censorship. Even your node might censor VALID transactions. If you want to know details, search "standard transactios". So, it is meaningless to say some rules are censorships. We should clarify these terminology to avoid confusing. I have been being considered to distinguish this two things. Followings are my rough definition. Censorship Censorship is banning INDIVIDUALS such as truckers, the opposition party, and etc. The OFAC sanction list is the exact example.

Sanctions List Search

As we know, #Bitcoin is censorship resistance, even if someone try to censor individuals, they can avoid the censorships. Filtering Filtering is applying their own rules. That's it. Your node is configurable and configuring means change your own rules. Then, some transaction would be invalid(would not be relayed) on your node, but valid(would be relayed) on others. We don't say this "censorship". I stand up for @Luke Dashjr even if I don't agree with everything from him.

I need to read this article again. Entire story is wiped out from my brain. View quoted note →

1) FAQ: Why 80 bytes of data? This is the leading programmer question, and it was not really documented well at all. Simple answer: 2x SHA256 or 1x SHA512, plus some tiny bit of metadata. Some schemes are of the nature "BOND<hash>" rather than just plain hash. A common IRC proposal seems to lean towards reducing that from 80. I'll leave it to the crowd to argue about size from there. I do think regular transactions should have the ability to include some metadata

[Bitcoin-development] On OP_RETURN in upcoming 0.9 release - Jeff Garzik

Why is #SamouraiWallet talking about censoring on Twitter, instead of #Nostr?

Why does people discuss censorship on twitter?

Is Ocean that mining pool? View quoted note →

A job interview is not a censorship.