sêkwêstkwân ᓭᑫᐧᐢᑎᑳᐧᐣ's avatar
sêkwêstkwân ᓭᑫᐧᐢᑎᑳᐧᐣ
852096ed@iris.to
npub1y8la...jeps
===>|-------------------------------------- CANARY STATEMENT I own myself TOX: A849D0FD25CE828C43DFC7BABC17B025F9069C202FC68CE856E2B00066FBA170D91650A43972 BTC: bc1qs4vc8yyxethje8xmyfdfrappuq8zmvlgs3wndz XMR: 47QBo29mTzgSRXx15b37yuaxQ7TDGYp5v4cNKWh9YDvp2v3bfrQvc3AiQWwuhtpijp65TPvAWURs4Mpy951rSba69mBa8Nh PGP: 6BD3B667DDDC1FDA Dated: Sun 08 Feb 2026 10:00:47 AM I am alive, am not coerced, No courts have caused me to reveal my key and this message is signed by this BTC wallet. --------------------------------------------|<=== bitcoin hash: H18W/BvhwenfGnpCZ8ukX/Wxf5ZGokOv5xPnhknZGWyfOgSppsbLGMN/y14HfvZEiWvbCFf7Swu0rvt/V6oJ3Kw=
🌙 Goodnight, fellow adventurers! 💫 May your dreams be as exhilarating as our latest project. 🚀✨ Rest well & wake up to more thrilling moments tomorrow! 🌅 #GoodNight #AdventureAwaits #RestUp #MorningGlory 💤😴
This is my personal bitcoin wallet. I am in control of this wallet and the keys. I am still alive as per the Nostr time stamp. My public key is. npub1y8la98zpzargx74pmlavuffagsp3vp2zgxvr8cqzd6avv5v23l6smvjeps Any BTC forwarded to this account will be recieved by this account. bc1qs4vc8yyxethje8xmyfdfrappuq8zmvlgs3wndz IDQ073aCm4bH8+E1HuYUQb/uVV3MdIClbFjk78m3HE2/bH7rM+M9FbZBVq8W51sTRHYgJrkJ5Ik+m1UqQZDsg9U=
The Retraction Watch Leaderboard Who has the most retractions? Here’s our unofficial list (see notes on methodology), which we’ll update as more information comes to light: Joachim Boldt (221) See also: Editors-in-chief statement, our coverage Yoshitaka Fujii (172) See also: Final report of investigating committee, our reporting, additional coverage Yoshihiro Sato (124) See also: our coverage Hironobu Ueshima (124) See also: our coverage Ali Nazari (104) See also: our coverage A Salar Elahi (92) See also: our coverage Jun Iwamoto (91) See also: our coverage Diederik Stapel (58) See also: our coverage Yuhji Saitoh (56) See also: our coverage Adrian Maxim (48) See also: our coverage Guilherme Malafaia (46) See also: Science Didier Raoult (46) See also: our coverage Ashok Pandey (45) See also: The Hindu (Note: 3 of the retractions in Bioresource Technology had his name added during revisions of the manuscript, but his name was removed from the final manuscript in the course of the investigation, so we are including them in his total count.) Jose L Calvo-Guirado (44) See also: our coverage Chen-Yuan (Peter) Chen (43) See also: SAGE, our coverage Jasti S Rao (41) See also: our coverage Fazlul Sarkar (41) See also: our coverage Shahaboddin Shamshirband (41) See also: our coverage Hua Zhong (41) See also: journal notice Naohiro Kameta (40) Shigeaki Kato (40) See also: our coverage Anna Borisovna Lopatina (38) Roshan Prasad (37) See also: our coverage James Hunton (36) See also: our coverage Mukesh Kumar Awasthi (35) Sivakamavalli Jeyachandran (35) See also: our coverage Hyung-In Moon (35) See also: our coverage Dong Mei Wu (35) See also: National Natural Science Foundation of China finding Antonio Orlandi (34) See also: our coverage Dimitris Liakopoulos (33) (NB: We’re counting a book he co-authored as a single retraction. The book has 13 retracted chapters with DOIs that are not included in this figure.) See also: our coverage Men continue to dominate the leaderboard, which agrees with the general findings of a 2013 paper suggesting that men are more likely to have papers retracted for fraud. list updated August 26, 2025
How was i introduced to Nostr??? I converted my phone to ubuntu touch os. One day i was looking at the apps and saw Nostrut. I was currious. What is a NOSTR client... I started an account... But it was blank.... I screwed around for a bit trying to interact with it. Lame i thought. Then one day i was cleaning my phone and i decided to give it one last go. I cued it up and there was content!!! Very good content. I started doom scrolling in perfect freedom. It was like Yahoo in 2001. Awesome. I am so glad that this happened in my life.
Yes, the **Codex Alimentarius** does allow for the use of insects as food. In recent years, the Codex has recognized the potential of insects as a sustainable source of protein and other nutrients. ### Guidelines for Insect Consumption - **Safety Assessment**: Insects intended for human consumption must undergo a safety assessment to ensure they are safe to eat. This includes evaluating potential contaminants and allergens. - **Hygiene Practices**: The Codex provides guidelines on good hygiene practices for the farming, harvesting, processing, and storage of insects to minimize health risks. - **Nutritional Value**: Insects are recognized for their high nutritional value, including protein, vitamins, and minerals, making them a viable food source. ### Global Acceptance Many countries are increasingly adopting regulations that align with Codex standards, allowing for the commercialization of edible insects. This shift is part of a broader movement towards sustainable food sources to address food security and environmental concerns. In summary, the Codex Alimentarius supports the use of insects as food, provided that they meet safety and hygiene standards.
image Hmmmm while drinking my coffee I almost spewed it over my screen... THIS JUST OUT Science fraud is an industry! It is all lies, mistruths and mis-information. I am not smart... I am just a lowly brown collar worker. Who or what am I to believe? How can I be informed when I am awash in systemic misinformation? Alberta, British Columbia, Canada.
Dune part two is pretty interesting. It reveals a secret that the Elites use to ply against the people. We the people stay our hands as we wait for a savior. Some one to lead us and guide us. He's not coming. You are your own savior. Jesus said himself, "Ye are Gods.". Wake up save yourself! We depend upon it!