GLACA's avatar
GLACA
glaca@nostrplebs.com
npub1rr65...eeul
I AM THE ORIGINAL REVOLTA. Original band Sweet Noise. Current project MTvoid with Justin Chancellor of Tool. I make NOISE and experimental art - NOISE INC. Sovereign Human Being. On NOSTR since 835520 #relaythat Pronouns : npub/nsec Check my noise experimental project : https://wavlake.com/noise-inc- My visual notes: https://glaca.npub.pro
GLACA's avatar
GLACA 3 months ago
Gaza. The Nakba continues. Free Palestine 🖤🇵🇸 image
GLACA's avatar
GLACA 3 months ago
Censorship resistance doesn’t mean everyone agrees on what’s valuable. It means everyone has the right to participate without gatekeepers — as long as they follow consensus. That’s Bitcoin.
GLACA's avatar
GLACA 3 months ago
Bitcoin is DEFENSE in censored world. This is the fundamental truth about censorship resistant networks: image
GLACA's avatar
GLACA 3 months ago
“Due to how censorship-resistant networks work, the tolerant minority sets the policy limits. And preferential peering amplifies this, so Knots nodes’ policies are actually almost completely ineffective — already, today, before Core 30 is released, and of course after.” — Adam Back This is an important admission. What Adam is saying is that in a truly censorship-resistant network like Bitcoin, you don’t need the majority to agree on what’s allowed. You only need a small group of nodes and miners willing to relay and confirm certain types of transactions — like inscriptions. That’s the tolerant minority. Through preferential peering (nodes connecting mostly to like-minded nodes), these permissive actors form their own effective relay layer — and that’s enough to push data through the network. Meanwhile, stricter nodes like Bitcoin Knots — which try to filter inscriptions and other non-financial use — become irrelevant. Their policies don’t stop anything. They just isolate themselves. Bitcoin doesn’t grant power to those who restrict — it defaults to those who refuse to censor. That’s how it was designed. That’s how it stays free.