Andrea Díaz Correia's avatar
Andrea Díaz Correia
andreadcorreia@primal.net
npub1zvye...vfj0
Software Developer | Lunarpunk | Animal @ La Crypta & Dev @ Mostrop2p
Andrea Díaz Correia's avatar
andreadcorreia 5 months ago
Al paso que van los celulares yo si veo posible correr un nodo de #bitcoin en un celular
Andrea Díaz Correia's avatar
andreadcorreia 6 months ago
Depression is incredibly hard to deal with — not just for the person suffering from it, but also for the people who care about them
Andrea Díaz Correia's avatar
andreadcorreia 6 months ago
Un monton me preguntan como empiezo a contribuir? Dónde? Cómo elijo? Bueno, voy a estar dando curso de como elegir proyecto open source, obviamente todo enfocado al ecosistema de #Bitcoin y #nostr completamente en español. Si quieren beca y que les quede gratis solo se anotan aquí
Andrea Díaz Correia's avatar
andreadcorreia 7 months ago
Seeing a lot of founders more in love with the idea of having a startup than with solving real problems. They don’t care about the product, they just want to be able to say “I founded a startup.”
Andrea Díaz Correia's avatar
andreadcorreia 8 months ago
La gente en #Venezuela no se ha dado cuenta que, siempre que quieran usar dólares o referencias a dólares, van a haber miles de tasas, porque muchos son aprovechados, y eso le da chance al gobierno de prohibir más cosas con la excusa de que está desestabilizando, aún cuando todo ya está súper desestabilizado, lo mejor es alejarse de cosas que el estado pueda controlar, y eso es bitcoin.
Andrea Díaz Correia's avatar
andreadcorreia 8 months ago
I insist that someone who didn’t live under a dictatorship, who doesn’t know what it’s like to be afraid to speak, who doesn’t know what it’s like to lack real freedom to make decisions, cannot truly understand the importance of anonymity and privacy, and even less why everything being achieved with #Bitcoin and #Nostr is so important. It’s not about using a blockchain, because in fact Nostr isn’t even blockchain. It’s about the freedoms it gives you as an individual and the power it takes away from governments and centralized entities. It’s about reclaiming what is rightfully ours.
Andrea Díaz Correia's avatar
andreadcorreia 8 months ago
Boosting my Friday productivity… by working with F1 practice sessions on in the background. No soy super fan de colapinto (mis fav siguen siendo Verstappen y Piastri) pero admito que si quiero que le vaya muy bien image
Andrea Díaz Correia's avatar
andreadcorreia 8 months ago
Que buena serie the office, no se cómo no la había visto antes
Andrea Díaz Correia's avatar
andreadcorreia 8 months ago
Quienes son de Venezuela aquí? Hacemos hacemos follow pack en following.space? Comenten aquí #grownostr #asknostr #venezuela
Andrea Díaz Correia's avatar
andreadcorreia 8 months ago
I'm trying to spend more time reading. This was the last book I read—it made me reflect on many things, from how I relate to others to how I choose to act in certain situations. Highly recommended #book #readstr #bookstr image
Andrea Díaz Correia's avatar
andreadcorreia 9 months ago
"Don't cry when we don't use Bitcoin Core shitcoiners" Dude, nobody's forcing you to use Bitcoin Core — if you want to try something else, go for it, it's all good haha.
Andrea Díaz Correia's avatar
andreadcorreia 9 months ago
Let’s talk a bit about OP_RETURN. First: what is it? It’s an opcode that allows arbitrary data to be stored in a transaction in a way that makes it unspendable. Simply put: you can use it to embed things like a message, a hash, or even an image in #Bitcoin. In Bitcoin, by consensus, there are no restrictions on OP_RETURN. These are fully valid transactions under the protocol. What blocks them today is a local policy in Bitcoin Core, not the protocol itself. So this proposal isn’t a philosophical shift — it’s an alignment between Core's standardness rules and the consensus rules. Calling it a “cultural change” ignores that the protocol already allows it. What exists today is a technical and policy inconsistency. Whether we like “spam” or not (meaning anything not strictly monetary), the reality is that it exists and will continue to exist. This proposal simply provides a cleaner path for it to happen. It doesn’t enable it — it’s already enabled. This isn’t about “welcoming” anyone, nobody needs permission to use Bitcoin, if someone wants to embed data, they will, the only thing we can influence is how they do it and how much collateral damage it causes. The current restrictions haven’t stopped anything, they’ve only pushed abusers to use more harmful methods like Taproot fake scripts, witness stuffing, etc. All of it worse for the system than using OP_RETURN. Let’s be honest: – There is no way to filter “spam” 100%. – Filters can be bypassed. – Miners can include whatever they want. – If someone is willing to pay the fee, they’ll do it — today or tomorrow. So what’s the most pragmatic option? ➡️ Align standardness with consensus. ➡️ Offer the least harmful path. ➡️ Acknowledge technical reality and minimize its impact. It’s not a perfect solution — but it’s the least damaging one. And most importantly, it’s the only one aligned with Bitcoin’s protocol. If you see this as a philosophical shift, it’s because you never truly understood how Bitcoin’s consensus works. We’re not opening a door, the door has always been open.