I really want to buy some STRC now, it's just $86. Partly to troll the maxis, just buy a small amount for fun
But I bought too much BTC already this month and can't afford it!
SatsAndSports
npub1zthq...xm56
Into bitcoin, specifically cashu.
When I'm not working in the fiat mines, I'm into cycling and camping
On Twitter, I'm starting to unfollow people that give too much attention to BIP-110
I generally enjoy the content of folks like @Shinobi and @Adam Back , but BIP-110 is now so boring to me that I unfollow them until this is all over and until they stop giving oxygen to BIP-110 and to unrealistic relay policy generally
The "debate" died long ago, and we (the tolerant minority) have won
Even the Bugle @Bugle.News #40HPW๐ง are running out of funny things to say about it; surely a sign that this topic is long dead
I first got properly into Bitcoin only last summer, and I had great fun arguing with Knotzis as I learned more about the topic. But there is nothing to be gained any more. Shinobi, it's time to accept that you won't get any satisfaction from Hodlonaut
I'm not sure if I'll engage with any replies; but of course I'll engage in good faith if I have met you in person and know that you're in good faith
Great story
View quoted note โ
I'll go to Bitdevs tomorrow. I missed it the last few months, sometimes from laziness and sometimes because I was out of town
Looking forward to it!
The next interesting step for MONAD (Tor/VPN, funded by Cashu Spilman channels) is adding a nice management API; then I hope to have a nice dashboard web-app (maybe a PWA) to monitor and manage the wallet and the client and the relay.
I've been adding a lot of smaller things recently, like blinded paths and more stress testing and other little improvements. But it's time to wrap this up into something easy to use, like a Docker container with easy configuration and monitoring. Then I can start asking people to do some testing
View quoted note โ
Stop pretending that the UK's problems around internet freedom are because it's "left wing" or "communist" or "woke"
The current UK Labour party are famously quite right wing compared to previous Labour governments, and the UK generally is a bit more right wing than many European countries such as France
This isn't a left versus right issue. It's a mixture of (Epstein) evil, and incompetence
The manipulators want you to think that it's a left versus right issue, so that they can distract you with culture war crap. Engage your brain, and keep your eye on our real goals
I keep trying to do my fiat job, but I keep getting drawn into freedom tech instead
-----
I've been busy with MONAD (cashu-funded Tor) in recent weeks. Various protocol improvements, and general stress testing under hundreds of simultaneous connections and hammering the payment channels
I started using KImiK2.7 and I like it so far. I'll use it for at least a few more days before trying to make a final judgement on it


reading Montaigne's essays
A longer-term idea to minimize prompt injection:
Hopefully, the future will be all open models and they'll all be running on commodity server farms (using something like @routstr to buy and sell)
I know there is randomness when predicting tokens, but we should make it deterministic, i.e. pseudorandom
Each server should sign every response. We should send a small fraction of our requests to two servers simultaneously.
If two servers give a different response to the same request, then it's likely one has cheated. With the signatures, we can then prove which server farm misled us
I guess this is a bit complex, but it's a fun problem to think about
View quoted note โ
Good read, on how Liquid keeps amounts private, while also being immune to the kind of issue that affected zcash recently
(Not very much technical detail though; I should follow the references here to learn more)
View quoted note โ
BTC Yield will continue until morale improves
View quoted note โ
I'm reading a Culture novel again now, for the first time since getting properly into Bitcoin and AI
There is a lot of AI in those stories, so it's interesting to read it now that it seems more realistic
And they're always pointing out that the Culture isn't so "organized"; no hierarchies and laws and so on. I guess it's what some anarchists would hope is possible
(They still have extraordinarily powerful armed forces though)
"Just transitory"
@Bugle.News #40HPW๐ง , monitoring the STRC de-peg
I enjoyed this much more than I expected I would.
I love Steve Keen's work, he's excellent on economics and it's history, especially on how fiat works.
I was a bit worried that Peter McCormack would be too ideological, but he was willing to learn and you can see that they both enjoyed this discussion.
Keen isn't a bitcoiner (yet); they didn't really discuss bitcoin here. We need a way to combine his expertise with the facts about the world today (e.g. the existence of bitcoin)
This debate is interesting, about economics during and after hyperbitcoinization. Some good points, but I also wish I was there to intervene and point out some historical facts that they might not be aware of
Around 36:30, Gammon is pointing out that, after hyperbitcoinization, people will want to borrow Bitcoin and generally that there will be some demand for credit creation and fractional reserve banking. While that's true, it's misses the point that credit creation is difficult when inflation is low.
Today, I wouldn't want to borrow a bitcoin. Even if I didn't have to pay interest on it, I know it would be very difficult to repay the bitcoin in a year from now (unless, of course, I just sat on it). When an asset (like Bitcoin) is going up in value - and also when it finally settles to its final value - then it's difficult to borrow it because it's difficult for the two parties (the lender and the borrower) to agree on a positive number as the interest rate.
In the opening minutes, Gammon points out that the US money supply increased as much in the late 1800's - when the US was on a gold standard - as it did between 2003 and 2023. While the discussion on that was interesting, they didn't point out that the late 1800's was a period when gold mining was increasing the supply of gold at a very fast rate, thanks to improvements in mining technology. So basically, the economy did well during that period because of the inflation that was introduced by the gold standard.
Economies can sometimes do very well when the money supply ('raw' money, and/or credit) is increasing quickly (late 1800's), and also when there is good regulation of the financial system (US from around 1940 to 1970).
Bitcoin's instant private cash settlement of the hardest possible asset will have dramatic impacts on the financial system, many of them bad. On *average*, I have some optimistism that the pros will outweigh the cons, but it will still have some of the harmful effects due to its deflationary effects
Fun prediction:
Strategy has been hammering STRC this week, causing the price to de-peg to $93, and using the proceeds to buy a lot of BTC

