WSJ and FT capture attention of a large % of wealthy and managerially influential people. So, of course it will be coopted to push agendas - it's readership is too valuable not to.
UK's main mistake under Chamberlain was that they didn't prepare their army and navy for a potential war. Chamberlain was right to try get peace, but it was ineffective because the UK had no leverage.
Today Trump is pushing states to increase their military capacity, while pushing for peace. I think this is a crucial difference.
(Also, Russia is relatively week after 3 years of fighting vs. Germany after the invasion of Poland or Sudetenland)
Brian Armstrong does at least make the case that Bitcoin will be the important global reserve asset. But he doesn't push back at all on the FUD that it's difficult to make payments with Bitcoin.
Think he just wants to custody the Bitcoin, and do partnerships with Visa. Very sad considering what Coinbase could have achieved.
https://fountain.fm/episode/ovaRt9JwD3cTMWt1tDzO
Was Elon's climate change warnings circa 2017 basically all just a grift to sell more Teslas?
Not that I disagree with his current pragmatic stance, but the previous rhetoric seems to be an example of corporate lip service to a cause they think plebs care about as a way to boost marketing.
Fascinating to see a lot of tech people being won over by the Trump admin just because they're more "pro innovation" on AI. Money & power often seem to outrank principles.
This is really cool. I often check polymarket, but the whole complicated shitcoin thing is off-putting.
Was able to easily place a bunch of bets here after signing in with lightning and giving a cashu lightning address - all with a few minutes.
https://beta.predyx.com/