Gloria ran away from Twitter. Greg Maxwell isn’t on Twitter. Adam Back and many other Core v.30 simps block pro-Filter advocates. This is not what The Truth being on your side looks like. 1 BTC + Less Spam > 1 BTC + More Spam

“Fix the money, fix the world” doesn’t work if we won’t take the time to fix defects in Bitcoin. When Satoshi saw defects in Bitcoin, Satoshi fixed the defects. Today we see defects from SegWit, Taproot, and Core v.30 and Bitcoin users pretend there are no defects.

The Knots implementation values Bitcoin more highly than Core v.30, which is reflected in the default settings. Filters enhance Bitcoin’s purchasing power. But Core v.30 sells Bitcoin down the river for 30 sats in spam fees. If you know, you Knots. Filters up. ✊🏼🫡

A non-discriminatory cyclical Dust Busting to cleanse the Bitcoin UTXO Set of Dust/encourage Bitcoin Best Practices and UTXO Management seems like a positive sum incentive to me. Feedback welcome.

Am I wrong to be mad the Samourai guys pled guilty and now the legal precedent is in place to go after other Bitcoin users & devs even if they get pardoned? Am I wrong to be mad that the Samourai guys practiced shitty & reckless public relations? Stay wary my merry fellows.✊🏼🫡

The problem with saying the “inflation bug was a bigger threat to Bitcoin than Spam” is how it implies we can’t defend ourselves from Spam Attackers unless it reaches an existential risk threat level, which only increases the risk of “too little, too late” But did Satoshi wait for Spam to reach an existential crisis level before implementing the block size limit? No, Satoshi and the early Bitcoin users fortified Bitcoin preemptively with the block size limit. The longer we wait to defend ourselves from Spam, the more the risk increases.

Everyone in Bitcoin was always so worried about the 51% Hash Attack on Bitcoin that we overlooked the 15.1% Degenerate Nihilism attack vector and the 51% Block Template attack vector. Run Knots + Ocean + DATUM to neutralize this attack. Datacarrier = 0 Filters up.✊🏼

Bitcoin is backed by hatred toward Fiat Slavery and Free Riding. If you know, you Knots. Filters up.✊🏼

The problem with saying the “inflation bug was a bigger threat to Bitcoin than Spam” is how it implies we can’t defend ourselves from Spam Attackers unless it reaches an existential risk threat level, which only increases the risk of “too little, too late” But did Satoshi wait for Spam to reach an existential crisis level before implementing the block size limit? No, Satoshi and the early Bitcoin users fortified Bitcoin preemptively with the block size limit. The longer we wait to defend ourselves from Spam, the more the risk increases.

To help ease people’s concerns regarding the current Bitcoin Spam Debate, here’s how I see it. Bitcoin with Proper Filters > Bitcoin Civil War > Fiat Clown World Where there’s a Will there’s a Way. Do knot go gentle into that good night. It’s necessary. Filters up.✊🏼

Withdrawing Bitcoin from the Exchange is the Short Squeeze. Withdraw = Short Squeeze Know what you own. Filters up.✊🏼

Spam is not an existential threat ≠ Spam will never be an existential threat Clearly, Spam/DDoS risk was a big enough risk to Bitcoin that Satoshi decided to create a block size limit. Witness discount/block size limit increase feels more ReTodded by the day. Filters up.✊🏼

The Spam Apologists embody the same complacent attitude that Treebeard had before the hobbits finally got him to see all the damage that Saruman was doing to Fangorn Forest. Spam will be priced out from Bitcoin even faster if we take steps to mitigate Spam.

Stealing - to take the property of another WRONGFULLY and especially as a habitual or regular practice There’s nothing wrong with freezing weaponized Dust UTXOs that obviously harm the Bitcoin Network. The Cat is justified. Webster’s Dictionary is useful. Good morning.

Spam degrades the infrastructure and purchasing power of the Bitcoin Network and is a violation of property rights. Spam is a kind of theft. Defending ourselves from attackers’ weaponized toxic zombie UTXOs by making them unspendable is not theft/confiscation.

Knots values Bitcoin more highly than Core. All things being equal: More Filters Up = More Number Go Up. If you know, you Knots + Ocean + DATUM

Bitcoin is Money. Cave Felem.

We should adapt Bitcoin to an evolving threat environment. The fixes Satoshi needed to implement in 2010 and the fixes we need to implement today are guided by the same principles: Protect Bitcoin’s Monetary Quality. Filters up.✊🏼

Bitcoin with Filters is a faster horse than a Spammers’ Paradise with no Filters. Bitcoin with Filters is a lean mean Money Machine. Spammers Paradise is perpetually bloated. Adam Back, GMax, etc don’t get it. Filters Up = Purchasing Power Go Up If you know, you Knots.✊🏼🔥

Satoshi launched Bitcoin with defects/vulnerabilities that had to be fixed. Satoshi fixed the defects. Bitcoin Core made changes to Bitcoin with SegWit & Taproot that introduced new defects/vulnerabilities. Core pretends the defects don’t exist. Conclusion: Core is dumb.