Sound Money will always be Bitcoin’s dominant strategy. There is no second best dominant strategy for Bitcoin. If you know, you Knots. Filters up. ✊🏼🫡

Read the opening of the BitVM White Paper. Bitcoin doesn’t need people to play Go, Chess, or Poker. It doesn’t need bridges to foreign chains, prediction markets, or to emulate novel op codes on L2. Bitcoin needs more user friendly full nodes on L1. bitvm.org/bitvm.pdf

The full nodes are Bitcoin’s Bedrock and Ozone Layer at the same time. Full nodes need to be prioritized by all Bitcoin users. Spam weakens Bitcoin’s bedrock and puts holes in its ozone layer. If you know, you Knots. Filters up.✊🏼🫡

Too many Bitcoiners live in denial about the 2023 inscription attack. They downplay it and pretend it didn’t do harm to the Network. In fact, they think we should lean in that direction further by increasing Op_Return limits. We need to stop relaxing & neglecting filters.

Self custody, solo mining, broadcasting your own tx, verification of Bitcoin, etc. are like the holy sacraments of Bitcoin. These are goals of real Bitcoin users because that’s where the source of the real purchasing power of Bitcoin originates. And it’s harder to accomplish these goals if full nodes aren’t more user friendly. Run Knots. Filters up. ✊🏼🫡

No need to bog down your Bitcoin full node with unnecessary bullshit data. If you know, you Knots.

If fees are the only filter we need, why have all these other constraints on Bitcoin? Why do we need a block size limit? Why do we need proof of work from the Miners? Why do we need dust filters?bWhy do we need difficulty adjustment? Why do we need 21 million supply cap? Bitcoin thrives on narrow gates and finite limitations. If you know, you Knots. Filters up.✊🏼

If fees are the only filter needed, then why don’t we just remove the Bitcoin block size limit and transition to Proof of Stake? 🤡

Do the Ghey Mysterio Bros (Shinobi & Calle) show up to work in their masks? Does Calle report to Jack Dorsey wearing his mask? Does Shinobi report to David Bailey wearing his mask? How does that work exactly? Asking for me and my Bitcoin frens.

Seems pretty obvious Peter ReTodd is an Agent of Chaos, trying to sabotage Bitcoin from within from its earliest days. Any Bitcoin user who associates with ReTodd should be viewed with suspicion. Adam Ball Scratch hanging out with ReTodd in that HBO Documentary is aging like ultra-pasteurized milk.

Standardizing 42-83 bytes for Op_Return was a mistake. Segregating the Witness to fix Tx Malleabiltiy and enable Lightning was reasonable. Witness Discount was highly debatable. Taproot was a mistake. Core v.30 is a disaster. Course correct with Knots. Filters up.✊🏼🫡

Distributed Authoritarianism > Degenerate Authoritarianism If you know, you Knots. Bitcoin is Money. Filters up. ✊🏼🫡

Christmas Tree JPEGs & CSAM on Bitcoin both degrade Bitcoin’s quality. CSAM is worse, but if you don’t see Christmas Tree JPEGs as a threat to Bitcoin, you still don’t get it. Stop being so myopic about CSAM & legal risks. All Arbitrary Data on Bitcoin is poison. Filters up. ✊🏼🫡

Bitcoin users deluded themselves and diluted the protocol with Mission Creep towards Arbitrary Data instead of always trying to use best effort to Mitigate the Arbitrary Data. We have to reverse course. Do knot downgrade to Core v.30. If you know, you Knots. Filters up. ✊🏼🫡

Next time a Bitcoin Dev tries to scare you about Spam using Bare Multisig, Fake Pubkeys, private key grinding, abusing UTXOs, etc… as justification to standardize Arb Data in Op_Returns or to keep neglecting inscription filters, it’s very important for you to call bullshit. Spam using Bare Multisig, Fake Pubkeys, UTXOs, private key grinding, while harder/impossible to filter is even more unfavorable to the Spam Attacker and harder to mass weaponize than Spam in Op_False Op_If & Op_Return, which is easier to filter too. If you know, you Knots.

Bitcoin users already gave the Degens a trash can in the Bitcoin Park in 2014. A 42 byte sized trash can for hash. A hash can, if you will. Now Degens want to make the hash can 1,250x bigger so they can put Pandora’s Boxes on the Bitcoin blockchain. F that. Run Knots. ✊🏼

160 bytes is fucking egregious, Jimmy. 42 -83 bytes is wildly generous. 0 is optimal. Don’t let Spammers degrade our property rights. If you do, you’re playing yourself. View quoted note →