For years, people were told that the Lightning Network was the future of Bitcoin scaling. Fast, cheap, global payments. But over time, even some well-known BTC developers and builders started openly questioning whether it actually works at global scale.
Antoine Riard, a Lightning developer and security researcher, publicly disclosed serious vulnerabilities in the Lightning Network and stepped away from LN security work, warning about unresolved problems:
https://news.bitcoin.com/lightning-network-developer-warns-about-major-vulnerability-abandons-security-tasks/
Chris Pacia, former OpenBazaar lead developer, also criticized Lightning heavily and argued that it could never become the scaling solution people were promised:
https://www.ccn.com/news/crypto/lightning-network-liquidity-below-5000-btc-openbazaar-developer-platform-never-work/
Even early Bitcoin Core developer Jeff Garzik later called Lightning a “dead end” for scaling:
This is why I continue to believe real peer-to-peer electronic cash should work directly on-chain, simply and reliably, without routing failures, liquidity issues, custodians, or complex workarounds.
The goal was always usable money for the world - not making payments harder.


Bitcoinist.com
Bitcoin Lightning Is A Dead End, Says Former Core Dev Garzik
Fifteen years after he first committed code to Bitcoin Core, Jeff Garzik still thinks the protocol will “outlast everything,” yet he no longer ...
















