Mohamed GigaChad's avatar
Mohamed GigaChad
Mohamed@primal.net
npub1qfes...6ee3
This is a revolution with a ledger. Bitcoin doesn’t negotiate. It replaces. قال القائد العظيم صلاح الدين الأيوبي: (كيف أبتسم والأقصى أسير والله إني لأستحي من الله أن أبتسم وإخواني هناك يعذبون ويقتلون) 🇵🇸 Palestine will be free Upscrolled: https://share.upscrolled.com/en/user/cc42e7a7-40cd-41f7-a53a-6a42a4d844ee/ X account MohamedGigaChad Voted most Antisemitic npub on NOSTR
I've reached the conclusion I'm not antisemitic enough 🙂 I'm done with casual antisemitism I need to go ranked!
I haven't said this in a while (10 minutes is a while) The thing is The fucking shylock bankers profit off wars! The fucking Jeeeewssss attacked the WTC on Tuesday September 11th 2001 Jews did 9 11 Israel did 9 11 Fucking Jews every time image
تمكن مجاهدو كتائب القسام بالاشتراك مع مجاهدي سرايا القدس من تفجير عبوة شديدة الانفجار بآلية صهيونية قرب حاجز "نتساني عوز" غرب محافظة طولكرم شمال الضفة الغربية المحتلة
تمكن مجاهدو كتائب القسام بالاشتراك مع مجاهدي سرايا القدس من تفجير عبوة شديدة الانفجار بآلية صهيونية قرب حاجز "نتساني عوز" غرب محافظة طولكرم شمال الضفة الغربية المحتلة
image The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki remain among the most controversial acts in modern warfare—debated for their proportionality and necessity even by Allied standards. To use them as a moral benchmark for Gaza, where precision-guided munitions have demolished entire neighborhoods, schools, and hospitals, is grotesque. Kirk ignores the context of Hamas’s October 7th attack. While morally indefensible, it did not occur in a vacuum. It was a violent response to decades of occupation, settlement expansion, and what Amnesty International has labeled apartheid. To frame it as “unprovoked” is to whitewash history. Israel’s policies—supported by U.S. funding and diplomatic cover—have perpetuated a cycle of violence that ultimately harms both peoples. Finally, the notion that a government (or non-state actor) bears sole blame for all subsequent deaths is a convenient abdication of ethical responsibility. By this logic, every civilian death in Dresden, Vietnam, or Fallujah was purely the fault of the defenders. This isn’t strategy; it’s sociopathy. International law, specifically the principles of distinction and proportionality, exists precisely to prevent such callous disregard for human life. Kirk’s argument isn’t just wrong—it’s a dangerous endorsement of collective punishment and endless war. Shame on him for leveraging American trauma to justify ongoing atrocities. Charlie Kirk is a piece of shit!